Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 13:48:55, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Given that there are only 9 different fields in the current DEP-5 syntax, I
> think that parsers can simply incorporate the full list of them rather than
> rely on a X- prefix to determine if a field is in the specification or not.

Sure. The only hitch is that the parser cannot distinguish between an extra 
field and a typo.

All the best.

Dominique
--
http://config-model.wiki.sourceforge.net/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/
http://www.ohloh.net/accounts/ddumont     -o- http://ddumont.wordpress.com/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201101161613.24844.domi.dum...@free.fr

Reply via email to