Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-11 Thread Steve McIntyre
y >a user-controlled key is equally problematic as non-free firmware. >Trisquel and Guix avoids these, and I recall seeing stuff like that in >Debian -- https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shim-signed -- but it is good >to know that we have more things to work. Sigh. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...

Re: Call for contributions to maintain existing documentation - Salsa makes it is easy!

2025-01-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
Jon Dowland wrote: > >I'm *fairly* sure that a more pressing issue is that MoinMoin requires >Python 2, which has been abandoned. > >At least the stable and deployed versions: 2.0.0a1 is the first release *nod* I think we have moin2 packages just about ready for use, but I have worries: it's not

Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine

2025-01-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
Jonas wrote: >Quoting Steve McIntyre (2025-01-14 15:16:49) >> Jonas wrote: >> >Quoting Serafeim (Serafi) Zanikolas (2025-01-13 22:06:01) >> >> >> >> thank you for the offer but why not have the follow up in a publicly >> >> archived

Re: wiki.d.o on a git-backed engine

2025-01-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
>https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/blend-tinker-devel Erm, WTF? How about keeping this on a main project list. And maybe even include the current people working on web and wiki admin? Unimpressed... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...

Re: handling the OpenPGP schism safely in Debian [was: Re: GnuPG 2.4 before Trixie freeze]

2025-01-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
GnuPG. There's a lot of loaded words in what you write there. Debian has *always* added config, applied patches and adapted upstream behaviour of upstream packages to make them fit our needs better. Why should GnuPG be any different? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.

Re: Kernel 6.13 & choice Init or SystemD for the user on Debian 13

2024-11-22 Thread Steve Langasek
aking the changes necessary to satisfy the Devuan developers that a separate distro is no longer needed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer

Re: Debian Monthly [debian-devel]: AI News Report 2024/10

2024-11-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
r now and tell people to look there. * Set up ai-summary.debian.net and post there, alongside suitable disclaimer text. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...

Re: Debian Monthly [debian-devel]: AI News Report 2024/10

2024-11-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
on our lists. If you want to publish them, publish them somewhere separately IMHO. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...

Re: proposal: Hybrid network stack for Trixie

2024-09-27 Thread Steve Langasek
ing, etc) and I also absolutely 100% did NOT want NetworkManager managing my ethernet port and had it configured via netplan instead. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. U

Re: Removing more packages from unstable

2024-08-21 Thread Steve McIntyre
ult. It hasn't been AFAIK, no. d-i always asks, with the default being "no". -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky, Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...

Re: what about Netplan?

2024-07-15 Thread Steve Langasek
n both Debian and Ubuntu - to my consternation as a member of the Ubuntu Release Team, since that increases the number of flavor images we have to manage releases of ;) - Canonical has not discontinued its development of lxd. I think the larger Free Software community pol

Re: what about Netplan?

2024-07-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
oo many to be >bothered to check between 10 and 999 commits. I understand what you're trying to say, but that's a disingenuous comparison. systemd is a massive (some would say *too* massive) project with fingers in many pies. How many of those people have touched *networking* bits? -

Re: Mini-DebConf in Cambridge, UK - October 10-13 2024

2024-06-24 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:18:56PM +0200, somebody *claiming* to be Luna Jernberg wrote: Just to be 100% clear, that mail didn't come from Luna's normal gmail account but was instead spoofed and sent via emkei.cz, a "free online fake mailer". It's now blocked from

Re: t64 suffix

2024-05-27 Thread Steve Langasek
ng on? The mass-NMUs included a lintian override to suppress this warning. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://w

Re: About i386 support

2024-05-26 Thread Steve Langasek
port for other armhf devices for both Ubuntu and Ubuntu Core to come soon in 24.04. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer

Please block glj....@gmail.com from Debian lists [Re: UOC and Britsh Council lawsuit]

2024-04-22 Thread Steve Langasek
ved. > > "Kinda or not" > -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com

Re: Debian

2024-04-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
that way. > >nvi adds to the subversive ones, with bash, etc. What on earth do you mean by "subversive" here?? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have noth

Re: finally end single-person maintainership

2024-04-08 Thread Steve McIntyre
ogtool to Salsa? > >Not speaking for logtool obviously, but maintaining simple packages on salsa is >just useless bureaucracy. So that's OK for *you* only in this case. Now consioder for the project as a whole. Every package that differs from the norm is more effort for anybody else to

Re: Package marked for autoremoval due to closed bug?

2024-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
of the maintainers at this point, it's very much dependent on folks rebootstrapping armel and armhf against the new library names. Should these bugs be downgraded again to important severity? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: time_t progress report

2024-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
those should still be coordinated with the Release Team. > Am 27. Februar 2024 08:19:21 MEZ schrieb Steve Langasek : > >Hi Simon, > > > >On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 11:40:56AM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > >> > glib2.0 # already in experimental > &

Re: 64-bit time_t transition: cargo needs manual intervention

2024-03-11 Thread Steve Langasek
one in Ubuntu is: - unpack cargo and libstd-rust debs to the root via dpkg-deb -x - use equivs to mock up packages by these names with no dependencies and install those - bootstrap - enjoy -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian De

Re: Requesting help with the t64 transition

2024-03-08 Thread Steve Langasek
n unstable for 2 days? I'm also not sure why it hasn't expired out of unstable given that it is superseded. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress in unstable

2024-03-07 Thread Steve Langasek
Similarly, libcom-err2 and libss2 don't use time_t, so > the rename to ...t64 was completely unnecessary. Yes, apologies, we can't assume any particular mapping from -dev packages to runtime lib packages in packages that have multiple -dev packages, so libcom-err2 and libss2 were

Re: Perl problem - loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched

2024-03-06 Thread Steve Langasek
all the libextutils-cbuilder-perl package anymore. (which, btw, was an arch: all package, so in any case it wouldn't be affected by the ABI transition.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move t

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress in unstable

2024-03-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 01:43:11AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 12:33:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > > Are there instructions on how to progress an unstable system through > > > > this, or is the repo currently in a known

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress in unstable

2024-03-06 Thread Steve Langasek
t is done (later today?), if apt dist-upgrade is NOT working, I think we should want to see some apt output showing what's not working. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.

Re: time_t transition and bugs

2024-03-03 Thread Steve Langasek
https://paste.debian.net/1309262/ curl, nordugrid-arc, poppler, qtbase-opensource-src, and xmlrpc-c have been uploaded with the fix. petsc will take a little bit, as there are other bugs that need fixing at the same time. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free

Re: Bug#1065022: libglib2.0-0t64: t64 transition breaks the systems

2024-02-28 Thread Steve Langasek
me troubles. Thanks for the information, > let's see if this is a real issue or not. Furthermore, this is a downgrade from a replacing package to a replaced package. Unless you also --reinstall the package at the end, missing files are quite to be expected. -- Steve Langasek

Re: time_t progress report

2024-02-26 Thread Steve Langasek
ansition through, we aren't going to vary it by much. So maintainer name reverts in unstable that happen after this are not guaranteed to be picked up, and whatever package names we have on the Ubuntu side are going to be locked in for a 10-year LTS cycle. So I think any maintai

Re: Another take on package relationship substvars

2024-02-23 Thread Steve Langasek
gate these substvars, *IFF* there is not already a reference to the substvar in question in the package stanza in debian/control? This would provide adequate flexibility for any other exceptions that might be out there, beyond the Pre-Depends case. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Re: time_t progress report

2024-02-23 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 04:36:43PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > On Mon, 2024-02-19 at 19:48:38 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I have coordinated with the gcc maintainer so that we can have the default > > flags in gcc-13 changed this week. > > We are therefore

time_t progress report

2024-02-19 Thread Steve Langasek
failed # no sane ABI info, no revdeps sipxtapi: failed # no sane ABI info; https://bugs.debian.org/1064328 snort: failed # obsolete, skip it python3.10: failed # soon to be obsolete skip it python3.11: failed # has to be handled manually, mark failed temporarily python3.12: failed Thanks, -- Steve Lang

Re: Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-16 Thread Steve Langasek
_compat_time() { > +fixup(pam_misc_conv_warn_time64, pam_misc_conv_warn_time); > +fixup(pam_misc_conv_die_time64, pam_misc_conv_die_time); > +} > +static void reset_warn_time() { > + pam_misc_conv_warn_time = 0; > + pam_misc_conv_warn_time64 = 0; > +} > +

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progressL

2024-02-16 Thread Steve Langasek
are being staged in experimental where possible, but we will not be pulling experimental versions into unstable as part of this. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 05:33:22PM +, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Feb 04, 2024 at 11:05:46PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > In fact, none of the t64 binaries currently being uploaded > > to experimental have the final ABI either, we're just using > > experi

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-15 Thread Steve Langasek
this be made the default in gcc or glibc ? On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:07:19PM +0100, Ansgar wrote: > On Fri, 2024-02-02 at 08:21 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Once all of these packages have built in experimental and we have identified > > and addressed all adverse interactions w

libselinux1t64 (et al): breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-15 Thread Steve Langasek
the package rename without so rename and then in forky > we'll have to clean up all those diversions, and in forky+1 we'll have > to delete the cleanup code, so while investing more now may seem more > expensive, it saves later. I think the cost of chasing upstreams about soname bum

Re: Bug#1063329: libselinux1t64: breaks system in upgrade from unstable

2024-02-14 Thread Steve Langasek
in unstable and breaking the world has affected the timeline, yes. I now have a tested patch that I've raised as an MP in salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/selinux-team/libselinux/-/merge_requests/9 I welcome review from the Debian libselinux maintainers prior to opening a discussion with upst

Re: postgresql-16; wrong NMU versions (Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress)

2024-02-05 Thread Steve Langasek
txt Much better that there be a library transition only for the lesser-used library! -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://w

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-04 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote: > On 2024-02-02 19:46, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If there is no new version in experimental, or there is a new version BUT > > the patch against unstable applies cleanly to the version in experimental > > (n

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
There may be build failures if there are interdependencies between some of these packages because of unsatisfiable build dependencies, but those will be resolved semi-automatically in cooperation with the buildd maintainers and only one round of builds will actually be required. -- Steve Langasek

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
aded to unstable, we will rebase all patches on whatever version of the library is in unstable at that time. You don't need to hold off on an upload to unstable for fear of conflicts. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 10:16:48AM +0100, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote: > Le vendredi 02 février 2024 à 08:21 -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit : > > The packages previously not reported are: > >    flint > >    flint-arb > About flint: if you need anything done, don't

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 07:34:46PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 08:21:57AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Dear developers, > > As mentioned previously on debian-devel[6], we know that there are a number > > of library packages being included in thi

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
in experimental can ignore this transition and just use the new soname once it finally lands (is superseded by the next LTS version?) On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 09:46:10AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 05:27:02PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On February 2, 2024 4

Re: 64-bit time_t transition in progress

2024-02-02 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 05:27:02PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote: > On February 2, 2024 4:43:52 PM UTC, Steve Langasek wrote: > >Hello, > >debian-devel-announce wouldn't let me attach the file, but for those on > >debian-devel at least, you can find the dd-list of to-b

Re: [Debian-iot-maintainers] Bug#1062257: libcoap3: NMU diff for 64-bit time_t transition

2024-02-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 07:45:57AM +0100, Carsten Schoenert wrote: > Hello Steve, > Am 31.01.24 um 21:59 schrieb Steve Langasek: > ... > > Please find the patch for this NMU attached. > > If you have any concerns about this patch,

Re: 64-bit time_t: package lists, counts du jour, dd-list for NMUs

2024-01-22 Thread Steve Langasek
libdmtx0b and libvibrant6b at least have explanations in the changelog. So I guess I'll work on fleshing out a rename map for these. On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:57:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Hello, > > Here is an updated analysis of the transition. This is based on a

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-21 Thread Steve Langasek
library does not have an > > > > ABI > > > > breakage, especially in the long tail of libraries with few > > > > reverse-dependencies whose involvement in the transition is unlikely to > > > > substantially slow down Debian development.

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 09:30:37AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am 07.01.24 um 02:01 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > If you say you are going to fix eventual breakage (and not ignoring the > > test results!) and if that means fixing asm on all affected archs, then > > it&#

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi again, On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 01:09:48PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am 07.01.24 um 04:38 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > The ordering here would be: > > - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default > >flags > > - the source packag

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timelineg

2024-01-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 09:33:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > And my proposal for checking that set, since we're only talking about > runtime library packages, is to check whether any of the contents of these > packages in bookworm match ^/lib - as a runtime library package NOT m

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-17 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Colin, On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 01:32:11PM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:01:11PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > > > Also

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:17:52PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Steve, > On 05-01-2024 17:36, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > Also a problem is that experimental also might already contain totally > > unrelated updates like new upstream versions... > I share this worry. Have you

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-08 Thread Steve Langasek
cause it will take time to get all the binary uploads done (longer than it will take to get the sourceful uploads to unstable done), so it's better to stage in experimental to minimize the window in unstable when uploads can be broken. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever l

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:25:52AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > > - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the > > > > default > > > > flags > > [...] >

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 09:07:15AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > > - dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the > > > > default > > > > flags > > > I  think at that point

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 10:01:30AM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes: > >> At one level, krb5-multidev only has an rdep of 5, but I suspect > >> the rdep count for libkrb5-dev is somewhat larger:-) I don'

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 02:23:59PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote: > >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes: > Steve> - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map > Steve> from a set of headers in a dev package to specific shared >

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
LFS and is a false-positive, I've removed this as well. Reduces the count of revdeps to be rebuilt from 5450+169 to 5450+168 (not much improvement :). -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set i

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
ld address your concern. It's not as if there is going to be any time that it's ok to tell maintainers they can't use experimental at all because we're doing this transition. > >experimental with the new binary package names in order to clear binary > >NEW, in c

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 09:32:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-01-05 11:06:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Hi Steve > > > > - perl will also get a sourceful uploa

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
which do not? Sorry for the confusion. The two lists requiring binary package name changes are the attachments named 'source-packages' and 'lfs-and-depends-time_t'. This is what I fed into dd-list, and encompass 1248 source packages (1195 + 53). -- Steve Lang

64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
g defaults will be uploaded to unstable - the sourceful NMUs of the libraries will be reuploaded to unstable (without binaries, so that they can be promoted to testing without additional uploads). - perl will also get a sourceful upload, to manually handle 'perlapi' Provi

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:53:50PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Hi Steve > > - perl will also get a sourceful upload, to manually handle 'perlapi' > > Provides. > Can we combine this one with the upcoming perl transition? See #1055955. Pros and cons of combin

Re: Bug#1036884: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:05:57PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 at 00:17:04 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > - In multi-library packages, there is no reliable way to map from a set of > > headers in a dev package to specific shared libraries in a

Re: 64-bit time_t: updated archive analysis, proposed transition plan with timeline

2024-01-05 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Sebastian, On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 06:34:38PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2024-01-05 00:23:00 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 12:17:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > == Results == > > > The overall findings of this analys

Re: Reaction to potential PGP schism

2023-12-28 Thread Steve McIntyre
ot;my gpg/$TOOL segfaults on your input", I want to be able to >point them at a documented decision and say "please report a bug to >$TOOL" instead of taking a week off to port everything again to gpg. > >Thank you for all the work you've done on this

Re: /usr-move: Do we support upgrades without apt?

2023-12-26 Thread Steve McIntyre
would i do?: reinstall some packages? reinstall the whole system? > >(maybe this should be in a bug against release-notes) Maybe a wrapper script to just report likely problems would be a good plan. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control.

Re: RFC: advise against using Proton Mail for Debian work?

2023-11-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
ly hope so! So I've just set up a ProtonMail test account to verify. Mailing to myself, it already clearly knew about my PGP key (I've already had lots of encrypted mails from ProtonMail users), but sending to a different address that came through in plain text. So *that* doesn't

Re: RFC: advise against using Proton Mail for Debian work?

2023-11-15 Thread Steve McIntyre
.org will encrypt the email that >>is sent to the BTSe...which has the effect of making Debian development >>veiled in plain sight rather than "in the open". > >Does it not encrypt email per-sender? Ewww, I certainly hope so! Do we have any examples of encrypted ma

Re: debian/copyright format and SPDX

2023-09-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:58:10PM +0200, Stephan Lachnit wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 11:11 AM Steve Langasek wrote: > > SPDX defines an xml format only. They lost before they'd even started. > > debian/copyright is supposed to be human-readable first and foremost. XM

Re: debian/copyright format and SPDX

2023-09-22 Thread Steve Langasek
> gain traction and people centered on desktop files. > We failed to gain traction on the structure of the copyright file, and > spdx is the one who has won here. SPDX defines an xml format only. They lost before they'd even started. debian/copyright is supposed to be h

Re: Re: Bug#1052004: libcbor: requires source-only upload to transition

2023-09-16 Thread Steve Robbins
It would be lovely to get this enabled! It's a pain point for me also, on occasion. -Steve

Re: Do not plan to support /usr/lib/pam.d for Debian pam

2023-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
he project. > I appreciate the value of doing work and having people who are willing > to do the work have a larger share of power in the decision making. I would like to see that discussion happen. I don't think this thread is that discussion, and I'm not stepping forward to

Re: /usr/-only image

2023-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
o pam, it's integration with the OS that has been done in /etc. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http

Re: Do not plan to support /usr/lib/pam.d for Debian pam

2023-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
ession-noninteractive} which are constructed at package install time and therefore are inappropriate to ship in /usr. Shipping the same file in both /usr and /etc from application packages seems like it would be a reasonable workaround as far as it goes, but doesn't let us empty /etc/pam.d

Re: armhf NEON exception for chromium

2023-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 10:15:53PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Steve, > On 15-09-2023 21:54, Steve Langasek wrote: > > armel != armhf > Of course > > and nobody should be running armel on a NEON-capable CPU... > Not sure why you say it like that, I guess you don

Re: armhf NEON exception for chromium

2023-09-15 Thread Steve Langasek
the list of > features of that machine.) armel != armhf and nobody should be running armel on a NEON-capable CPU... or chromium on an armel-only system. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I

Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod

2023-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
s expressed, in all of the packages in the archive. An audit of that sort would certainly be unrealistic. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer

Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod

2023-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
s of religious texts would presumably be the first things > tossed onto the pyre. Don't you think it's a bit hyperbolic to equate "not distributing a text in our archive" to "book burning"? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free

Re: Questionable Package Present in Debian: fortune-mod

2023-08-18 Thread Steve Langasek
als > who have themselves engaged in terrorism or other violence toward > individuals and groups, supported those who have engaged in such > activities, or been otherwise complicit in such. Lol bothsidesing anarchism and fascism -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long en

Re: Potential MBF: packages failing to build twice in a row

2023-08-14 Thread Steve Langasek
has > bothered me. It just hasn't bothered me enough to investigate what the proper > way to solve it is. It hasn't bothered me enough to bother other people with > this issue. Agreed. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: Mini-DebConf in Cambridge, UK - November 23-26 2023

2023-07-23 Thread Steve Langasek
So while it's best practice when replying to make sure you're sending to the right address, the fact that it winds up in your announce imap folder is a local configuration issue, not a question of where it was sent. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fr

Re: proposal: dhcpcd-base as standard DHCP client starting with Trixie

2023-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
and get human-editable netplan files out), it's certainly close. And I can say that I am a happy user of netplan across multiple systems, with no need to manage networkd configuration directly. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer

Re: 64-bit time_t: an update

2023-07-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 12:30:50AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 14:27:21 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > to understand the impact that a change to the size of > > time_t will have on a library's ABI, it must be possible to compile the > > he

64-bit time_t: an update

2023-07-19 Thread Steve Langasek
in having some of these library packages excluded from the transition is welcome to contribute fixes up to that deadline that will let us analyze them and show that the ABI has not changed. Your thoughts? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Develop

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-07-06 Thread Steve Langasek
1038482 1039564 Also closing WNPP bug(s): ===== -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Jun 08, 2023 at 04:06:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 18:17:44 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > The difference in my view is that the changes to handle Provides: are > > something that should persist in the packaging (until the next soname >

Re: booststrapping /usr-merged systems (was: Re: DEP 17: Improve support for directory aliasing in dpkg)

2023-06-09 Thread Steve McIntyre
they can work even if we don't have the library loader >on the ABI-compliant path? What exactly do you mean here? You know that even a statically linked executable needs an interpreter defined in the ELF header? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-06-08 Thread Steve Langasek
a decision if we find that there isn't consensus. If we need more assurance that the project supports the decision, I think it's better to go straight for a GR. I wouldn't like this to drag on too long into the trixie release cycle. -- Steve Langasek Give me a

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-06-06 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Helmut, On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 09:33:22AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:04:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > * … but NOT on i386.  Because i386 as an architecture is primarily of > > interest for running legacy binaries which cannot be rebuil

Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)

2023-05-30 Thread Steve Langasek
ons of old computers, refurbishes them, installs Linux, and both sells them and provides them free to people in need. They receive x86-64 systems that they determine are *too old to be worth refurbishing* and they e-cycle them. Hanging on to systems using power-hungry chips from 20 years ago in

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 06:24:53PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > We don't need to enable/fix it for everything though. A rebuild check of > > affected libraries to see how much work this adds would be a good idea. > Isn't it a problem not just for library ABIs but al

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
ABIs but also for any other packages rebuild with -D_TIME_BITS=64, because the code will be consuming the 64-bit prototype from the headers but using the 32-bit symbol at runtime? (Which is a better answer in terms of automation, because then we can just put it in dpkg-buildflags) -- Steve Langasek

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-05-22 Thread Steve Langasek
ver, I fail to see any way that we can effectively mitigate this in advance - either now or by delaying the time_t transition. I don't see any way to avoid this via automated source analysis, so the only option (given that we can't avoid the time_t transition forever) is

Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal

2023-05-19 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 09:04:10PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Based on the analysis to date, we can say there is a lower bound of ~4900 > source packages which will need to be rebuilt for the transition, and an > upper bound of ~6200.  I believe this is a manageable transition, and

Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)

2023-05-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
Steve Langasek wrote: > >On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 12:42:32PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >If the main reason is to support non-free binaries, at least to me >> >that does not seem like a very compelling reason. And people can >> >always use old chroots or s

Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)

2023-05-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
Andrew Cater wrote: >On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 03:03:40PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> I had been thinking about doing similar for installer images too, but >> with other work going on too I think it got too late in the cycle to >> make that change. My plan is there

Re: i386 in the future (was Re: 64-bit time_t transition for 32-bit archs: a proposal)

2023-05-19 Thread Steve McIntyre
ootstrap and {s,}chroot will cover the vast majority of needs. That's how we've been building i386 software already for ages in Debian already. More complex things can be done if needed: loopback mount an image, debootstrap, install a kernel, etc. I don't see this as somethin

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >