--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) Option to compile dependances as opposed to
> > automatically downloading the dependant packages.
>
> I believe that apt-build can do this. Unfortunatly,
Ok, I haven't looked at apt-build yet.
>
> > 2) Option to add additional compile flags to gc
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> debianplanet.org has stuff like this (incidentially
> and only because I'm
yeh I know but not as easy to use as Gentoo's are
IMHO. BTW I agree with you regarding CD images. Gave
up in the end trying to download and order CDs from
Linux Emporium instea
OK, howzabout some useful links that show that
although Debian may be losing some users, which is
still a shame, it perhaps not as bad as some would
think.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=3614
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=24417
The first link shows a poll done a while ago on
Hi,
apt-src, good start, really like the fact that it
figures out dependancies and creates .deb file once
complete and is fairly easy to use.
However, there are some things I would like to see
added at some point if possible:
1) Option to compile dependances as opposed to
automatically downloadi
Hi,
> apt-src?
yup, sorry shouldn't write mail and do other stuff @
the same time.
> Don't fool with the Debian architecture name. It
> might be better to
> install pentium-builder instead.
>
got that installed I pretty sure. Actually I was
talking rubbish about it building against i386 arch,
Hi,
been playing with deb-src to see how it works.
Interesting little utility. I noticed when it started
the old ./configure that the arch was set to i386, but
I prefer to have this set to my arch. I can't find
anything in the docs that says if this is possible or
not, anyone have any ideas? I
--- Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 01:58:25PM -0800, Jon Kent
> wrote:
> try to paint Debian as relatively unpopular. I
> don't see what your
> objective is, other than to start and prolong
> pointless arguments.
>
What
--- Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, it doesn't. It shows that the most frequently
> viewed distribution pages
> on distrowatch.com are:
I did say they were not great figures, just
interesting, but I expect this sort of comment from
you.
> If you had lived through a stable Debia
--- Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "'Multiple exclamation marks,' he went on, shaking
> his head, 'are
> a sure sign of a diseased mind.'"
> (Terry Pratchett, Eric)
Indeed, or someone who trying to convey that they are
annoyed.
> | A point release is. not. sarge.
>
> stable
OK I have enough of this for the moment, do what you
feel is right but I'm not convinced that some of the
directions things are going are for the benefit of
Debian, the blinkers seem to well and truely attached
to some people.
To the people here who at least replied in a polite
manner, thanks, and
--- Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we. don't. have. a. working. installer. for. sarge.
>
> how hard is that to comprehend?
>
Thanks for the witty reply but thats why I suggested a
_point_ release, OK, its not the same as a major
release, comprehend!!! A point release is. not.
sa
Right I'm more awake now, its was late a night went I
sent my last mail. A special thanks to Matt for his
reply ;-)
Right lets make this clear, I'm not here to push
Gentoo, I was originally responding to the original
question, is Debian losing users to Gentoo? Rather
than bother arguing the poin
Hi,
--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So, volunteer your time and start packaging
> xserver-xfree86-experimental, if you think that's
> feasible. Just because
> the X maintainer chooses to give priority to keeping
> architectures in
> sync doesn't mean that it's not possible to
> Never ask a Gentoo user that question. The answer
> is always one of the
> following:
>
> 1) "I don't care"
> 2) "What's S/390?"
I really don't care ;-), when I am or 99.999% of
Debian users ever gonna get near a S/390, high end Sun
kit sure, but S/390 pls.
Jon
_
> Never ask a Gentoo user that question. The answer
> is always one of the
> following:
>
> 1) "I don't care"
> 2) "What's S/390?"
I really don't care ;-), when I am or 99.999% of
Debian users ever gonna get near a S/390, high end Sun
kit sure, but S/390 pls.
Jon
_
--- Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:53:10PM -0500, Daniel
> Burrows wrote:
>
> > That assumes that the runtime dependencies are a
> subset of the build
> > dependencies and their recursive dependencies.
> >
> > Imagine a program that displays its output
--- Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Releases tend to be out of date. But that's a
> > > feature: releases need to be composed of well
> tested
> > stable packages.
> > > testing and unstable
> > > have pretty up to date packages.
This is true, but is not considered sta
Hi,
> Releases tend to be out of date. But that's a
> feature: releases need to be composed of well tested
stable packages.
> testing and unstable
> have pretty up to date packages. So Debian is as up
> to date as you
> want; the caveat being that for newer software,
> you'll need to put up
> w
Chaps,
Another thing I must say is that I object in the
highest order some the mail sent out regarding this
topic which basically say good riddance to the users
who have switch to Gentoo as they caused loads
problems etc etc. This is short sighted and I hope
the people (idiots??) who said this ha
OK, I think I can add something to this little chain
mail as I use both Debian and Gentoo.
Why do I do that? Well, Debian is great and all and I
use it on servers etc, but on my workstation I want
alot more control that Debian can, or probably ever
can, give me. As an example, I don't want or us
20 matches
Mail list logo
