mming Lang: Python
> Description : drop-in substitute for collections found in Python 2.7
There was already an ITP for this (#637849) and it was cancelled due to
the planned removal of Python 2.6.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
each of which is in a different package.
>
> Probably the best thing to do would be to just incorporate the functionality
> in the less package.
You mean like lesspipe(1)? Seems like it might need to be updated to
handle *.xz, but other than that looks like it fits the bill.
--
Ja
's not
> really that hard).
Feel free to post a (link to a) patch on above URL or in #alioth@OFTC.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:23:49PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 25/05/2011 13:20, James Vega wrote:
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:46:11PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> >> On 05/24/2011 01:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >>> Am 23.05.2011 22:35, schrieb Roland Mas
that look like
> >> http://anonscm.debian.org/$scm/$project for $scm in arch bzr darcs git
> >> hg;
>
> Please provide a proper gitweb instance or at least a proxy at that url
> to the anonscm gitweb instanace.
The old URLs now redirect to the new ones, so nothing should be broke
; without epoch. But this is not documented anywhere.
Why assume the first version will be >= 1.x? It's not uncommon to use
0.x. Using 0~YYMMDD seems a safer option to reduce the chance of
needing an epoch if/when upstream starts using actual version numbers.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/6
) which
simplifies making watch files for github projects.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
f you "apt-get update" while the mirror is in the
middle of a sync. Once the mirror has finished the sync, you'll be able
to use it normally, but the real fix would be for the mirror to update
their script.
[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/2011/02/msg00055.html
--
Jame
n order to compute the hash sum
for comparison?
[0]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mirrors/2011/02/msg00055.html
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
keep them in ubuntu-dev-tools?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTinJC2AHouG=prenzbpod0ls4dxzmygvbmrwo...@mail.gmail.com
contribute. One generally tries to work with a project, not write a lot
of code in a language the project isn't using and then come back later
to try and push that code into the project.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
rt. This is currently Perl and shell.
So yes, IMO, accepting scripts written in Python (or any other language)
is too heavy. Not for a "_development_ machine", but for a maintenance
team. If people choose to ignore our requirement and develop scripts in
other languages, then they can
erl
> Description : yet another json package
Isn't this what the libjson-perl package already in the archive is?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> James Vega writes:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>>> My claim is that packages like unattended-upgrades and pm-utils are
>>> completely unrelated to each other, and that a hook in
>>&
7;t be able to
recover. The proper fix is to configure the unattended upgrade not to
upgrade kernels, if possible.
[0]: See /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/000kernel-change
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
if yes, what exactly would you propose?
dict-wn is what started dictd. The problem is that dict-wn's postinst
in Lenny didn't use invoke-rc.d to restart dictd, so it didn't honor
policy-rc.d. This isn't a problem in Squeeze since the postinst is
using invoke-rc.d.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
user input here, correct?
>>
>> Yes, but you shouldn't, since the file installed in lenny was not modified,
>> so it's a bug somewhere.
>
> Well I'm fairly new to the maintainance of this package but I would guess the
> postinst of lenny modifies ip
uld be prime for triggers instead of having the various
database-providing package worry about what the server needs to do.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin_jitezhmv0ufotxfde77hc6ocarisbfw5z...@mail.gmail.com
kms. The other is building stuff with
> module-assistant, usually in -source packages as in
> openafs-modules-source.
>
> The suffix makes it clear what kind of package this is.
Sure, but that's a distinction for the names of the binary packages not
that of the source package.
--
what it was -- maybe it doesn't exist anymore.
This used to be available as source.debian.net. According to the
wiki[0], there appears to be work starting on a replacement.
[0]: http://wiki.debian.org/source.debian.org
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
"build".
You can work around it, as has been pointed out in this thread, by
moving arch:all stuff outside of the build target to something which the
binary-indep target has a pre-requisite on, but then you're building as
root.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
7th-june-2007
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
download and install
> variousredistributable runtime libraries
Do we really need a package for a single file?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
oad.
>
> That gives a 404. source.debian.net doesn't, but gives you a page with
> as full contents the eight characters 'hallo...'
According to <http://wiki.debian.org/source.debian.org> it's still in
the idea/planning phase.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D
http://bugs.debian.org/583336
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilzor8zd1o9z0skwucltbcsctfyxxlxyt6i4...@mail.gmail.com
release needs to be configured first.
3.5 is an overview. 7.2 has the details:
Depends
This declares an absolute dependency. A package will not be
configured unless all of the packages listed in its Depends field
have been correctly configured.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 20
change among my fellow
Vim maintainers. I think the vim-tiny package has ended up being more
work than it's worth.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of a stable
release. This is not the case with the Mozilla-related packages, as
new version updates (other than the security fixes already being
handled) are a nicety, not a requirement.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-r
rovide a
standard implementation of actions like this.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikux_6xkwud9ppo8h-_w7zn_nxnypx63gqox...@mail.gmail.com
version. If you want to help achieve that, take a look at the
bug list for that transition:
http://tinyurl.com/Py26Transition
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s.debian.org/487753dc.5020...@cox.net
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
urce format. That's not going to change overnight and
the Dpkg developers have already stated that the deprecation of an
implied source format is a long term goal (likely Squeeze+2).
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
source version in Lenny and Squeeze. 746 when comparing
Etch and Squeeze.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
the only member, then you do a "newgrp
> bar" for foo, foo is no longer in a UPG situation, so his umask should
> be 0022 at that point.
Except /etc/profile won't be sourced again unless "newgrp - " is
used, right?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 Jam
to require $DEBEMAIL or $EMAIL to be
set, then I have no problem removing our use of the mail command.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
header and the User-Agent
header was only added in response to #493884. While the User-Agent
header is useful, I could see backing out this change so bts doesn't
require the non-standard -a flag.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Therefore, there is no reason to
have a specific browser name in the package name and should instead use
a common naming convention.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
From /usr/share/lintian/checks/binaries:
if ($info->field('source') ne 'zlib' and $info->field('source') ne 'klibc'
and $strings =~ /(?:in|de)flate (?:\d[ \w.\-]{1,20}[\w.\-])/m) {
tag "embedded-zlib", $file;
}
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
y this: it
> > generates a "3.0 (quilt)" source package using a VCS repository as input.
>
> I guess what we should have is additional line in it or additional file
> to record vcs used for packaging which will not interface with the basic
> operation of other tools.
time, I can add it to my list of things to look at when I
next have some time to work on devscripts. I'm hoping to get some soon,
but things have been a bit hectic lately.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.deb
MOAOLTDR, by which I mean
> "simply a matter of adding one line to debian/rules".
You make the mistake of assuming everyone use debhelper.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Lintian tags that you don't consider
useful if you use this option.”
In other words, if you think the tag is useful then fix it, otherwise
ignore it.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
gh
the current package forces icedove usage.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ke ftp-master didn't take to that.
Or they're waiting for other items to be implemented before moving
forward, just like the text you quoted says.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
being affected by Java's brokenness with bindv6only (c.f.,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560056)?
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
, will update B later
> - remove A
> - installing new A, but already exist
> ==> FAIL
Package: A
Depends: B
Conflicts: B (<< newversion)
Replaces: B (<< newversion)
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
DME.source is supposed to refer back to the
patch system's documentation instead of duplicating it.
[0] - http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#s-readmesource
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien is correct. See #559863 and merged bugs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
figuration file is left as is.
>
> # testing perl is required to avoid problem in embedded environments
> if [[ -e /usr/bin/perl ]]
'[[' for testing is a bashism. This should be
if [ -e /usr/bin/perl ]
or more accurately
if [ -x /usr/bin/perl ]
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/6132
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
>> I think it *is* material in this instance:
>>
>> Versions of python-defaults in Debian:
>> unstable: 2.5.4-2
>> experimental: 2.5.4-3
>>
>> Version of package in Ubuntu:
>> Version: 2.6.4-0ubuntu1 (karmic)
>> Uploaded by: Matth
e zack meant debsign, given some extra context that got
snipped, "Still the check for unsigned .changes is in dput and it's
pretty damn useful."
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
gt; RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload on 10/31.
I'd guess that was a misinterpretation of Ross Burton's idle request for
someone to adopt it upstream.
http://www.burtonini.com/blog/computers/postr/new-maintainer-2009-11-12-10-49
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM, John Goerzen wrote:
> It would be *great* if this could be fixed before sarge comes out.
Sarge shipped with firefox, so no worries there. ;) Squeeze, on the
other hand, might need some work.
SCNR.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James V
's comments were (always a good idea).
Right. I'd think that if there were a negative review, the proposer of
the patch would go back to work on it further before resubmitting.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Could we add 'ReBuild-Depends' statement into debian/control to
> rebuild like packages when depends rebuild? But such kind of depends
> require some changes in buildd system.
This is only needed when the dependencies change something
tch for #346409, but there appears to be issues with it as
noted in the bug log.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
by another arch-dependent package. Many
of those either Recommend the relevant package or declare no
relationship at all.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:27:25 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> On mer, 2009-10-14 at 16:23 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > the key litmus test is: does the application depend solely on non-free
>> > information to function properly. th
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:55 PM, George Danchev wrote:
> I've recently done a little survey about the fields used in our control files
> (*_Release files excluded). Currently there are ~80 different fields [1] used
> in
> testing and unstable, which basically fall into these groups:
>
> 1) listed
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Now we have
> libkpathsea-dev depends libkpathsea4 (= 2007.dfsg.2-7)
> and I still get these errors. libkpathsea-dev is at version 2007.dfsg.2-7.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547773
Fixed in Lintian 2.2.17
-
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009, Marc Haber wrote:
>> And people know that the package is built automatically. All users I
>> know especially opted in to using the package instead of freshclam for
>> some-or-other reason.
>
> WHERE is that
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:19:25AM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 19:02 -0400, James Vega wrote:
> > tag 528494 help
> > thanks
> >
> > #528494 raised the idea of having vim-tiny (the default vi-like editor
> > on a base install) pr
iners
vim
Pierre Habouzit
vim (U)
Teruyuki Morimura
jvim
Jan Christoph Nordholz
nvi
Brendan O'Dea
vile (U)
Miquel van Smoornburg
elvis-tiny
Paul van Tilburg
vile
James Vega
vim (U)
Colin Watson
vigor
Paweł Więcek
e3
[1] - See debi
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:08:26PM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> Hi James:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:11 PM, James Vega wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:44:07AM -0400, Jonathan Yu wrote:
> >> Better yet, if we could periodically run it on all of the modules in
>
ner/p/pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org.html
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
might be appropriate in some cases). But there
> was no announcement in this case.
Which Sandro mentioned in his email.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; it seems to work for most packages, though
> [...]
>
> "patch" indeded is the standard way nowadays. See policy 4.9.
I think you mean “recommended”, although not using that could be a
reason to have a README.source explaining how the package is handled.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s probably one of the reasons why the per-file Copyright field is
listed as option in the DEP.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
together on the package?
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/526348
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:40:41PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> >> James Vega wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:24:59PM +0200, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> James Vega wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> >> I find no official documentation on format of debian/watch files.
> >
> > man uscan
>
>
>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:16:44PM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> I find no official documentation on format of debian/watch files.
man uscan
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
type of person who treats email as an extension of your
long-term memory, Sup is for you.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
deed look better.
>
> Please have a look at garlic-doc. It does not look right.
It's using `o' as the bullet character which is not supported by
Markdown/rST. This has already been identified as a case that will need
to be fixed by the individual packages (or pre-processed into some other
character).
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
vironment")
endif
ifeq "$(origin FOO)" "file"
$(info "FOO was set in the Makefile")
endif
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
elog:
+ Removed
- description-synopsis-has-leading-spaces
- postinst-does-not-call-installdocs
- prerm-does-not-call-installdocs
So, you're just using outdated tools.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
words as
> possible, is the impediment?
Read the CDDL section under the FSF's list of GPL incompatible licenses.
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hose files/directories a
command gets run. They're supposed to make it so that only one package (the
one providing the command that needs to be run) has to know that the command
needs to be run. This is far less error-prone than relying on every developer
to remember which commands to run in
has been discussed various times in the past on this list, is
difficult to determine.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
(U)
Gerrit Pape
bcron
raccess4vbox3
KELEMEN Péter
arpwatch
Nick Rusnov
nmh
Santiago Vila
smartlist
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hings in Debian, not really missing it for a
> specific need.
Looks like that wasn't moved to ravel when people.debian.org changed
hosts. It's still accessible, for now, if you use oldpeople.d.o
instead.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Jon Bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>e16menuedit
> => we don’t ship E16 anymore
packages.debian.org says otherwise.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
s
he energy of finalizing the proposal
> > (most likely via a DEP), so that is stops being an ever changing wiki
> > page.
>
> Well, not exactly, you cannot easily see the copyright file before
> installing the package, can you?
It's linked from the packages.d.o and PTS page for the package.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ki [4].
>
> Use Replaces:, just as for other files that move between packages.
As I understand it, you should also remove the conffile[0] from the
original package according. If you do not, you'll run into bugs like
#499451.
[0] - http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
-
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>vim (U)
Working on a tpu upload to fix issues for Lenny.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ment but both seem to be
dead in the water.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
;t find that thread in the list archives...
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> were the two previous discussions.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
as little involvement as
you like.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
kernel config? I brought up what seems to be the same (or at least
closely related) problem 4 years ago on lkml[0].
[0] - http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/4/5/209
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
those had "NoDisplay=true" as one of
the fields[0]. While there may be a drive to add .desktop files to
packaging, there's a similar (sometimes overzealous, IME) drive to have
them not displayed by default.
[0] -
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuPackagingChanges?highlight=%28NoDisplay
ove scenarios is the use
of alternatives. There is the problem which brian brought up[0] about
using diversions when you can't rely on having alternatives setup
already but that would be obviated if dpkg internally handled both
diversions and alternatives.
[0] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
James
GP
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 07:34:53PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> James Vega writes ("Re: RFC: Idea for improved diversions and alternatives
> handling"):
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 06:40:23PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > What should happen when severa
or specific circumstances and the diverted/diverting
packages should be closely related (if not from the source).
Alternatives are the better solution when there are myriad,
non-conflicting sources which may provide the same file.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
t, you could go to threads.html
and easily find the post about the perl vulnerability.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Even better would be programs using a library like enchant which
provides a front-end to the myriad other spell libraries. This allows
the user/application to use the library backend that works best for
their use case/language.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Veg
not POSIX.
The "local" keyword is an explicitly supported extension. These are
discussed in Section 10.4 of policy.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ian.org/477240
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ipts as well as having the triggered call to update-menus
occur.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
titude will now list packages that are
newly obsolete. This doesn't work when a source is removed and
all its packages become obsolete, for technical reasons.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
