On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no> wrote: > My claim is that packages like unattended-upgrades and pm-utils are > completely unrelated to each other, and that a hook in > unattended-upgrades which breaks pm-utils by preventing hibernation is a > critical bug, even if the breakage seems intentional.
Is this just a case of an upgrade pulling in a new kernel, which could cause pm-hibernate to disallow a hibernate[0]? If so, this isn't unattended-upgrades breaking pm-utils, but pm-utils properly preventing you from hibernating in a situation that you wouldn't be able to recover. The proper fix is to configure the unattended upgrade not to upgrade kernels, if possible. [0]: See /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/000kernel-change -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <james...@debian.org> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTikGMX5Nwq=npqqdpwaaxsvzcom23p1ut6mdt...@mail.gmail.com
