On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Bjørn Mork <[email protected]> wrote: > My claim is that packages like unattended-upgrades and pm-utils are > completely unrelated to each other, and that a hook in > unattended-upgrades which breaks pm-utils by preventing hibernation is a > critical bug, even if the breakage seems intentional.
Is this just a case of an upgrade pulling in a new kernel, which could cause pm-hibernate to disallow a hibernate[0]? If so, this isn't unattended-upgrades breaking pm-utils, but pm-utils properly preventing you from hibernating in a situation that you wouldn't be able to recover. The proper fix is to configure the unattended upgrade not to upgrade kernels, if possible. [0]: See /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/000kernel-change -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
