On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:32:38PM -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> Sorry, I'm new to the dpkg system. I looking around on the web site
> and couldn't seem to find good docs on this specific
> issue. Appologies if I missed it.
> I want to take a Debian source package and make a few changes to do
Quoting Gonéri Le Bouder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> I think that tools like synaptic or Debian Installer should have an option
> to
> >> provided a screenshot or/and the project logo with the text description.
>
>
> >The graphical version of D-I will include a "screenshot" option.
> Hello,
>
>
Third try posting this. Something is wrong with Debian's mail server?
Sorry, I'm new to the dpkg system. I looking around on the web site and
couldn't seem to find good docs on this specific issue. Appologies if I
missed it.
I want to take a Debian source package and make a few changes to do it
a
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
> > Doesn't work if the key is ever compromised and a new one has to be
> > created out of schedule. Or when you spend your x-mas holidays away
> > from your system and couldn't upgrade before new years eve.
>
> Exac
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: oci-mpc
Version : 3.3.95
Upstream Author : Designed by Justin Michel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Chad
Elliott.
Implemented by Chad Elliott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : dnscruft
Version : 0.20060508-1
* URL : file://home/kilobyte/dnscruft/
Initial packages : http://angband.pl/debian/dnscruft/
Apt : deb[-src] http://angband.pl/deb
On 5/9/06, Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Florian,
> First, do you plan to make some rules for the screenshots ? Like for X11
>apps... "screenshots should be took under WM 'x', version 'y', and
>theme 'z'" ?
We have to keep the default setting of the the application.
We don't re
I demand that Jamie Jones may or may not have written...
> On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 16:59 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Le Dim 7 Mai 2006 15:07, Jon Dowland a écrit :
>>> BSP is a tool for calculating the Binary Space Partition (BSP) for
>>> doom-engine levels. The result is stored in the NODES
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 15:28:58 +0200
Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:13:39 +0200
> "Milan P. Stanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Net::SMTP already supports AUTH service extension (RFC2554), IIRC.
> >
> > Is it wise to have two Perl modules for th
On 5/8/06, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 08, Tim Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's because it's behind a firewall like I said. My mail works
> fine, as long as the Sender: field is not set.
No, the envelope sender is wrong and the Sender header is not related to
this. A
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> On 5/8/06, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> >
> >> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> >> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> >> internal
At 1147084722 past the epoch, Jamie Jones wrote:
> G'day Jon,
Hello! (nice hostname btw)
> How does this compare to Zennode (
> http://www.mrousseau.org/programs/ZenNode/ ) ? or glBSP (
> http://glbsp.sourceforge.net/ and .debs are
> http://www.youmustbejoking.demon.co.uk/progs.sarge.html#glbsp )
On May 08, Tim Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's because it's behind a firewall like I said. My mail works
> fine, as long as the Sender: field is not set.
No, the envelope sender is wrong and the Sender header is not related to
this. A correctly configured server will reject your mail.
On 5/8/06, Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> internal networks smart host is overloaded.
>
> host ALUM-
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Tim Olsen wrote:
> Is this something that should be fixed in perl's mailtools or is my
> MTA setup not kosher? I prefer to have my MTA send mail because my
> internal networks smart host is overloaded.
>
> host ALUM-2.mit.edu [18.7.21.145]: 553 5.1.8 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
At 1147021163 past the epoch, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> given that the upstream name seems to be doombsp,
The upstream name is BSP: only the sf.net project name is
doombsp. I can only hazard that either cph or the SF staff
thought of BSP as being too generic.
> and that bsp is a common tla: Bug
Hello,
I am trying to use caff send signed keys from a key-signing party.
caff successfully signs each key but some of the emails are refused
because the receiver's server fails to verify the sender.
My MTA is set to receive and send mail on its own; however, it is
behind a firewall so the act
Hi Florian,
> First, do you plan to make some rules for the screenshots ? Like for X11
>apps... "screenshots should be took under WM 'x', version 'y', and
>theme 'z'" ?
We have to keep the default setting of the the application.
>Who would create, upload and validate the screenshots ? Someone of
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:47:53PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> So you expect systems to become exploitable by mounting /usr as noexec
> when they provide some /usr/bin/foo shell?
Not actually "expect", but I would not be _that_ suprised. Most programs
that care about the login shell tend to run
>> I think that tools like synaptic or Debian Installer should have an option
to
>> provided a screenshot or/and the project logo with the text description.
>The graphical version of D-I will include a "screenshot" option.
Hello,
Where can i get information about that?
Where will be stored the
Hello Piotr,
* Piotr Ozarowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [2006-05-04 17:32 +0200]:
> * Package name: python-paste
>Version : 0.9
>Upstream Author : Ian Bicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://pythonpaste.org/
> * License : MIT
>Programming Lang: Pytho
Hello,
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:36:45PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> uh?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ apt-cache show bcm43xx-fwcutter
> Package: bcm43xx-fwcutter
[...]
hm, I must have been asleep, I found only the modules when I searched
for it, yesterday.
Sorry for the inconvenience, closing
Hi,
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> * Package name: bcm43xx-fwcutter
> Version : 004
> Upstream Author : Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> and Alex Beregszaszi
> * URL : http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/
> * License : GPL
> Descript
Also, I can trivially add an xlibmesa-glu transitional package that depends
on libglu1-mesa if that's required.
That is exactly the kind of thing I was hoping for.
Ok, I've just done this. Steve Langasek let me know what I wasn't seeing
properly. I really shouldn't respond to bug reports when
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bcm43xx-fwcutter
Version : 004
Upstream Author : Martin Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> and Alex Beregszaszi
* URL : http://bcm43xx.berlios.de/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: alex bodnaru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: cyclone
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Cyclone is a joint project of AT&T Labs Research, Harvard,
the University of Maryland, and the University of
Washington.
Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 09:13:39 +0200
"Milan P. Stanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net::SMTP already supports AUTH service extension (RFC2554), IIRC.
>
> Is it wise to have two Perl modules for the same task with a different
> syntax?
I considered this issue when i sent this ITP, but a new upst
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > Such a binary is completely broken, and it would fail in a similiar way
> > for any sort of file it has no execute permission for, not only for
> > $SHELL.
>
> Sure, but that does not change the fact that i
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 11:53:15AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Such a binary is completely broken, and it would fail in a similiar way
> for any sort of file it has no execute permission for, not only for
> $SHELL.
Sure, but that does not change the fact that it is a failure path that
is usuall
Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:00:42AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>
> > > You can surely explain why /bin/nologin is more secure than
> > > /bin/false. I'm eager to learn.
> >
> > I am curious why any of both would be more secure than /dev/null, a
> > place which makes it hard
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:00:42AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > You can surely explain why /bin/nologin is more secure than
> > /bin/false. I'm eager to learn.
>
> I am curious why any of both would be more secure than /dev/null, a
> place which makes it hard to smuggle an infected binary into
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 09:13 +0200, Milan P. Stanic wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> > * Package name: libnet-smtpauth-perl
> > Version : 0.08
> > Upstream Author : Alex Pleiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://searc
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:39:27PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
>> >> And the latest buildd attempt was on sparc, and it is
>> >> "maybe-successful":
>
>> > An accident of the build environment -- it looks like mrpurply had
>> > libxaw-dev already install
>［添付ファイル削除］
here, the cheats
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:12:35 +0300, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Colin Watson wrote:
> >> The rest of the system accounts are happily running with /bin/false
> >
> >There is now /bin/nologin whic
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> * Package name: libnet-smtpauth-perl
> Version : 0.08
> Upstream Author : Alex Pleiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-SMTP_auth/
> * License : Perl
> Progra
On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:12:35 +0300, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Colin Watson wrote:
>> The rest of the system accounts are happily running with /bin/false
>
>There is now /bin/nologin which is more secure
You can surely
37 matches
Mail list logo
