Marc Haber wrote: > On Fri, 05 May 2006 11:12:35 +0300, Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Wed, 3 May 2006, Colin Watson wrote: > >> The rest of the system accounts are happily running with /bin/false > > > >There is now /bin/nologin which is more secure > > You can surely explain why /bin/nologin is more secure than > /bin/false. I'm eager to learn.
I am curious why any of both would be more secure than /dev/null, a place which makes it hard to smuggle an infected binary into. Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
