Hi folks,
libs11n[0] is a nice C++ serialisation library. The author makes no
secrets about shortcomings (e.g. when compared to boost's libs11n),
but also has some funky stuff in place no other serialisation
library offers. Quickly: serialisation is saving and storing data
from C++ programmes.
0.
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 174 (new: 13)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 100 (new: 5)
Total number of packages reques
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> I'm about to remove the libxslt1 package, which has been created a long
> time ago for backward compatibility, when upstream did screw up ABI and
> removed support for the libxsltbreakpoint library.
> Now that no package depend on it,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: eyeos
Version : 0.6.2.3
Upstream Author : Pau Garcia-Milà <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.eyeos.org/
* License : GPL
Description : personal CMS based upo
* kamaraju kusumanchi [Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:04:18 -0400]:
> I need not wait for one day to erect my broken sid machine.
Indeed, you need not. In case of breakage, fixed packages would be
available right after upload in http://incoming.debian.org.
(Except during that special hour or now ho
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:04:18PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> I was just browsing through the wiki and came across this very
> interesting idea. It would be really useful if the mirrors are updated
> more frequently. I need not wait for one day to erect my broken sid machine.
> http:/
Scripsit Sebastian Kuzminsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suggest dpkg-divert /usr/bin/git, and install a shell script as
>> /usr/bin/git, which will invoke either program depending on a certain
>> environment variable[1] or a configuration file.
> Does this
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 08:18:10AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that alioth/haydn is down in the IRC channel topic,
> and trying to ssh to the server seems to confirm the situation.
>
> Is this a scheduled downtime that I missed an annoucement for or
> some unexpected breakage? (
Hi,
I see that alioth/haydn is down in the IRC channel topic,
and trying to ssh to the server seems to confirm the situation.
Is this a scheduled downtime that I missed an annoucement for or
some unexpected breakage? (i.e. How long should I wait for it
to come back up)
regards,
junic
On 8/11/05, Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Processing time to do a dinstall cycle and pulse all mirrors is quite
> high. You would hit mirrors with the next pulse while the old one
> still runs a lot of the time and, even worse, update the master mirror
> between phase1 and phase
Scripsit Jeroen Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:00:59PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>
>> On the other hand integrating Debian's *packaging* infrastructure
>> (i.e., the debian/ subdirectory) in upstream source cannot be
>> recommended. It only creates trouble for develo
kamaraju kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>I was just browsing through the wiki and came across this very
>interesting idea. It would be really useful if the mirrors are
>updated more frequently. I need not wait for one day to erect my
>broken sid machine.
>
> http://wik
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10-Aug-05, 13:38 (CDT), Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > [1] Useful fragment for cross platform shell scripts:
>> >
>> > #!/bin/sh
>> > # Do the Solaris Dance:
>> > if [ ! -d ~root ] ; then
>> > exec /usr/xpg4/bin/sh $0 "$@"
>> >
On 8/11/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > Just one more question: what happened to my original emails?
>
> I read them. Most likely I saved the wrong one for further processing. Thats
> why it is a good idea to c
* Terry Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050810 17:37]:
> > Documentation in /usr/lib/foo?
> Sorry? I don't understand what documentation you mean. The .ps file _is_
> the resource.
Ah, okay. Sorry, I missunderstood that.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
http://learn.to/quote/
http://www.catb.o
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:40:41PM -0500, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
> > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian
> > s
On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 18:46 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>phpbb2
For the curious: fixed in svn, will be included in next upload.
Thijs
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Qingning Huo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest dpkg-divert /usr/bin/git, and install a shell script as
> /usr/bin/git, which will invoke either program depending on a certain
> environment variable[1] or a configuration file. It is possible to achieve
> the following objectives.
>
> (1) Inst
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodule-find-perl
Version : 0.04
Upstream Author : Christian Renz, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/~crenz/Module-Find-0.04/
* License
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
> leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian
> standards for package naming.
How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package namin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:23:12AM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Just one more question: what happened to my original emails?
I read them. Most likely I saved the wrong one for further processing. Thats
why it is a good idea to copy the bug report. Sorry for your double work.
Gruss
Bernd
--
On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 15:18 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:
> all in all, if you offer a distro that is several years old it's not
> suitable for _general_ desktop use (I'm sure it would be OK for _some_
> dektop users), regardless of how much you dislike people running unstable.
Then stick with tes
Hello,
I'm about to remove the libxslt1 package, which has been created a long
time ago for backward compatibility, when upstream did screw up ABI and
removed support for the libxsltbreakpoint library.
Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
leaves a libxslt1.1 package
Scripsit Jeroen Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:00:59PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
>> On the other hand integrating Debian's *packaging* infrastructure
>> (i.e., the debian/ subdirectory) in upstream source cannot be
>> recommended. It only creates trouble for develop
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 05:28:48PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:20:23AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> > Qingning Huo suggested using diversions to make /usr/bin/git a little
> > selector script that lets the admin & user choose between git-the-shell
> > and
Quoting Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Conflicting is Not An Option. So policy says, for good reasons.
OK, bad idea.
> There is precedence to consider. Sarge already contains a git package
> that provides /usr/bin/git. Users who update from sarge to etch would
> not be served well if the
Scripsit "W. Borgert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Either rename the executable to /usr/bin/git-the-scm (or
> whatever) or conflict with the other git.
Conflicting is Not An Option. So policy says, for good reasons.
> Or ask the other git people to rename their binary. Maybe
> git-the-scm is (or will
Hi
I was just browsing through the wiki and came across this very
interesting idea. It would be really useful if the mirrors are updated
more frequently. I need not wait for one day to erect my broken sid machine.
http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly
I have also read the corresponding
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:20:23AM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> Qingning Huo suggested using diversions to make /usr/bin/git a little
> selector script that lets the admin & user choose between git-the-shell
> and git-the-scm. This sounds good to me, who objects?
What are you going to do a
Quoting Sebastian Kuzminsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I've pushed the "rename it upstream" idea on the upstream maintainers
> twice now and it gets shut down by both Linus (the original author)
> and Junio (the current maintainer). [2]
There is still the option to rename it for Debian only,
without c
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Marco d'Itri]
> > Reality? git is the kernel SCM and GNU Interactive Tools is an
> > obscure package, and you should just install /usr/bin/git.
> > If the GNU Interactive Tools maintainer refuses to rename the other
> > program then just conflict wi
Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> All packages which supply an instance of a common command name (or, in
> general, filename) should generally use update-alternatives, so that
> they may be installed together. If update-alternatives is not used,
> then each package must use Conflicts to
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #29
Owner: "Martin-Éric Racine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I notice that this ITP is already 192 days old and still has not been acted
upon.
Meanwhile, I have been spending the last few hours helping the upstream author
* Humberto Massa Guimarães [Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:39:56AM -0300]:
> Yeah, but what does it *DO*? If it is a library, it oughta be called
> libmpfi ... and it should be stated.
It is a library. The source package is called `mpfi', the binary
package is called `libmpfi-dev' (only a static library
On 10-Aug-05, 13:38 (CDT), Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [1] Useful fragment for cross platform shell scripts:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > # Do the Solaris Dance:
> > if [ ! -d ~root ] ; then
> > exec /usr/xpg4/bin/sh $0 "$@"
> > fi
> >
>
> sigh.. okay, my "correction" had bugs, t
> * Package name: mpfi
> Version : 1.3.3
> Upstream Authors: Nathalie Revol, Fabrice Rouillier (email ommited)
> * URL :
> http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/nathalie.revol/software.html
> * License : LGPL 2.1 or later
> Description : multiple precision floating-poin
Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For for the first time since potato, I reinstalled Debian from scratch
> on my main box. Hoorah for dist-upgrade! One experience I took away
> from the installation is how impressed I was with partman, the
> debian-installer partition management tool. Th
[Marco d'Itri]
> Reality? git is the kernel SCM and GNU Interactive Tools is an
> obscure package, and you should just install /usr/bin/git.
> If the GNU Interactive Tools maintainer refuses to rename the other
> program then just conflict with it.
Ah, conflict resolution by the use of force. The
On Aug 11, Sebastian Kuzminsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People who just want GNU Interactive Tools get what they want. People who
> just want Cogito get what they want. People who want both have to learn
> a new name for one of them. Seems good to me. Am I missing anything?
Reality? git is
The mail you sent to Wayne Christopher regarding "Re: my application"
was not delivered, because [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses
are no longer being used.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mpfi
Version : 1.3.3
Upstream Authors : Nathalie Revol, Fabrice Rouillier (email ommited)
* URL : http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/nathalie.revol/software.html
* License : LGPL 2.
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:17:27 +0200
Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi. The problem is important not only for libnss-db package but also
> for libnss-ldap, libnss-mysql and others.
>
> $ ldd /usr/lib/libnss_db.so.2 | grep /usr
> libdb-4.3.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.3.so (0xb7e100
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:09:44PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> So, I'm proposing this:
>
> GNU Interactive Tools installs /usr/bin/git.shell (or something)
>
> Cogito installs /usr/bin/git.scm (or something)
>
> update-alternatives is used to make one of those appear as
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sigh.. okay, my "correction" had bugs, too :-)
better as
if [ ! -d ~root -a -x /usr/xpg4/bin/sh ] ; then
Better yet, be POSIX compliant:
if [ ! -d ~root ] && [ -x /usr/xpg4/bin/sh ] ; then
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Hi. The problem is important not only for libnss-db package but also for
libnss-ldap, libnss-mysql and others.
$ ldd /usr/lib/libnss_db.so.2 | grep /usr
libdb-4.3.so => /usr/lib/libdb-4.3.so (0xb7e1)
So the system can't unmount /usr partition on poweroff process. I wonder if I
shoul
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 01:00:59PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:
> On the other hand integrating Debian's *packaging* infrastructure
> (i.e., the debian/ subdirectory) in upstream source cannot be
> recommended. It only creates trouble for developers when the policy
> and environment they are pack
Bump.
On 8/6/05, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Didn't I (also) send you a much later version?
>
> Hmm.. I cant find that, but yes I thin u did. Can you dig that up?
Sure: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222324&msg=19
J
47 matches
Mail list logo
