On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian > standards for package naming.
How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package naming? > So, what do you think ? Should I just leave it the way it is now or try > to make it cleaner ? Are there any functional or practical reasons to change the package name back to libxslt1? If not, I don't see any need to change it. -- gram -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
