On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 01:40:41PM -0500, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that > > leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian > > standards for package naming. > > How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package naming?
"The run-time shared library needs to be placed in a package whose name changes whenever the shared object version changes. The most common mechanism is to place it in a package called librarynamesoversion, where soversion is the version number in the soname of the shared library" soname is libxslt.so.1 Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
