Hello, I'm about to remove the libxslt1 package, which has been created a long time ago for backward compatibility, when upstream did screw up ABI and removed support for the libxsltbreakpoint library.
Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian standards for package naming. I was wondering if I should come back to good practice and provide a libxslt1 package with the library, and a dummy libxslt1.1 package for upgrade support (which should only be removed after etch release). It could break some external stuff depending on old libxslt1 (thus libxsltbreakpoint), but are there really any left outside of debian ? So, what do you think ? Should I just leave it the way it is now or try to make it cleaner ? At the same time, should I do the same with libxml2 and name it libxml2-2 ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
