Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > >On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > >>I don't know that I'm one of the "relevant people", but since the issue > >>came > >Sure you are, as you have a trusted path to ftp-master :) Thanks Steve. > > Now tha

Bug#293103: ITP: atokx2 -- Kana-Kanji translation system ATOK for Linux (Installer)

2005-01-31 Thread Taku YASUI
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: atokx2 Version : 17.0-2.0 Upstream Author : JUSTSYSTEM Corporation * URL or Web page : http://www.justsystem.co.jp/linux/atok.html * License : non-free (commercial license) Description : Kana-Kanji translation system AT

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Anthony Towns
Joey Hess wrote: Anthony Towns wrote: Neither. Shell snippets should not go in PATH unless they also happen to be programs. I hate to say it aj, but you just gave him a hell of an out there... Yeah, *shrug*. Rhetoric is getting pretty boring. Bug#293096, fwiw. Cheers, aj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Joey Hess
Anthony Towns wrote: > Neither. Shell snippets should not go in PATH unless they also happen to > be programs. I hate to say it aj, but you just gave him a hell of an out there... #!/bin/sh # This is /usr/in/gettext.sh if [ "$0" = "gettext.sh" ]; then echo "Ha ha, I'm executable, so I ca

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Joey Hess
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > I did an amd64 install last week from the (then) current install image I said it was fixed in sid (in particular, it's fixed in hw-detect 1.12); you've not given me enough information to narrow it down between one of perhaps 12 different images you could have used, and perh

Re: Bug#292759: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Joey Hess
Matthew Palmer wrote: > If I do 'man ls' I can get the semantics for the ls command. No > such benefit is provided me by gettext.sh. Hmm, time to report a bug > against gettext-base for not having a manual page for gettext.sh... I realize that you're probaly using that example as a rhetorical de

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Anthony Towns
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: I don't know that I'm one of the "relevant people", but since the issue came Sure you are, as you have a trusted path to ftp-master :) Thanks Steve. Now that merkel's back up (and, err, ... now that it's synced again),

Re: non-ftp way to upload packages

2005-01-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050131 23:20]: > El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 23:15 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo escribió: > > Hello. > > > > Is there any way to upload packages without using FTP? > > My provider has some queueing stuff and ftp has very low priority... this > > way I

Re: Bug#292572: ITP: praat -- program for speech analysis and synthesis

2005-01-31 Thread Brian May
> "Rafael" == Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Rafael> * This is partly free software; you can redistribute BUT NOT MODIFY Rafael> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by Rafael> * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the L

Re: non-ftp way to upload packages

2005-01-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 11:15:12PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote: > Hello. > > Is there any way to upload packages without using FTP? > My provider has some queueing stuff and ftp has very low priority... this > way I get many timeouts uploading packages. > > The I have to use .commands f

Re: Bug#292666: ITP: autoreply -- A safe, rate-limited auto-responder

2005-01-31 Thread Brian May
> "Christopher" == Christopher Sacca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Christopher> * Package name: autoreply Christopher> Version : 1.2 Christopher> Upstream Author : Giles Lean Christopher> * URL : http://www.nemeton.com.au/sw/autoreply/ Christopher> *

Re: non-ftp way to upload packages

2005-01-31 Thread Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
El lun, 31-01-2005 a las 23:15 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo escribiÃ: > Hello. > > Is there any way to upload packages without using FTP? > My provider has some queueing stuff and ftp has very low priority... this > way I get many timeouts uploading packages. > > The I have to use .commands fi

non-ftp way to upload packages

2005-01-31 Thread Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo
Hello. Is there any way to upload packages without using FTP? My provider has some queueing stuff and ftp has very low priority... this way I get many timeouts uploading packages. The I have to use .commands files and try to upload one more time. SSH/SCP has very high priority in our LAN, so thi

Bug#293055: ITP: rails -- MCV ruby based framework geared for web application development

2005-01-31 Thread Adam Majer
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: rails Version : 0.9.5 Upstream Author : David Heinemeier Hansson * URL : http://www.rubyonrails.com * License : MIT Description : MVC ruby based framework geared for we

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Otto Wyss
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: > > > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/"; > >> > can. > >> > > > I guess mirrorer doesn't care for bandwith saving a

Re: Bug#292759: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Martin Schulze wrote: > Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > > You wouldn't need to change "every" script - you just need to move > > > gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh > > > with the content Sean suggested. > > > > Which buys us what? > > > >

Re: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

2005-01-31 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, > These four packages also link against both libpam and libmysqlclient10 > and might experience segfaults when accessing MYSQL over PAM with > libpam-mysql if libpam-mysql switched to libmysqlclient12: > > linesrv-mysql, pur

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Andreas Barth
* Goswin von Brederlow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050131 19:35]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: > > I guess mirrorer doesn't care for bandwith saving as DpartialMirror, > > correct me if I'm wrong. > Currently it will always redownload the Packages/Sources files as gzip > on every update to fix

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Adrian von Bidder wrote: >> > You wouldn't need to change "every" script - you just need to move >> > gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh >> > with the content Sean suggested. >> >> Which buys us what? >> >> This ne

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Well, then add line like > > echo gettext 'WARNING: This program uses the (deprecated) /usr/bin/gettext.sh > interface. This is a bug' >&2 > > To that file in /usr/bin. It'll ensure a quick transition, I'm sure. Shouldn't we get upstream to depreca

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:46:50PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:31:03AM +0100, Joey Hess wrote: > > Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > My package works as designed, but let me know if you can design > > > something better. > > > > Oh, so it's udev that's responsible for what II

Re: german debian mirror with 700mb paris.avi file...

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Florian Weimer wrote: > Would debian-admin or the security team like to act as a contact for > such problems (i.e. potential compromise of Debian infrastructure)? > Perhaps http://www.debian.org/security/ could be updated accordingly? Anything but a non-public list/forum/whatever would be fine and

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > You wouldn't need to change "every" script - you just need to move > > gettext.sh to /usr/share/gettext/scripts and create /usr/bin/gettext.sh > > with the content Sean suggested. > > Which buys us what? > > This new gettext.sh would still be a non-executable script s

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > All other packages have their script sniplets in /usr/share/, > e.g. devscripts, debhelper, debian-cd, ... You forget to notice one thing, these are debian specific. The gettext.sh script, however, is meant to be used by just ". gettext.sh" by random third party prog

Re: circular dependencies and dist-upgrades sarge->woody

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek wrote: >> > There is one case in which users can be bitten by this: when using apt-get >> > dist-upgrade to sarge, so when documenting the woody-sarge upgrade, it >> > should >> > be at least mentioned that the user can run into this and

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Vincent Danjean
Cajus Pollmeier wrote: Here's the result of some testing: debpool:is fine for new pools, but recreating the whole mirror with .deb and .udeb packages didn't work and I'm not the perl guy who's capable of fixing it. dak:too complicated for fire and forget mirrorer:not

Re: circular dependencies and dist-upgrades sarge->woody

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Steve Langasek wrote: > > There is one case in which users can be bitten by this: when using apt-get > > dist-upgrade to sarge, so when documenting the woody-sarge upgrade, it > > should > > be at least mentioned that the user can run into this and should first > > upgrade apt to solve this proble

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/"; >> > can. >> > >> A note of caution: >> >> | 2004-04-03 (wyo) Since Debian does not change its policy to add >> | adequate support f

Re: NEW queue and ftp-master approval

2005-01-31 Thread Frank Küster
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Overall, in my eyes, the question becomes: Does Debian trust DDs not >> to add debs with silly names to existing sources? > > I recently was very mistaken about the proper way to deal with a >

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Am 30.01.2005 um 16:01 schrieb Thiemo Seufer: > >> Cajus Pollmeier wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release >>> files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I >>> currently need to switch

Bug#293010: ITP: nautilus-sendto -- integrates Evolution and Gaim into the Nautilus file manager

2005-01-31 Thread Andrew Lau
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: nautilus-sendto Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Roberto Majadas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.es.gnome.org/~telemaco/ * License : GPL Description : integrate

Re: Bug#258884: Bug #258884 - Got Bootsplash in debian throug patch or user space tools

2005-01-31 Thread Nico Golde
hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-31 18:56]: > a small update , the project is already going under > debian-desktop umbrella: > > some developments packages: > http://www.latinomixed.com/downloads/debian-embelisher/README > > irc channel and rationale: > http://lists.debian.org

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 09:32 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Parents are *supposed* to censor what their children see. > > > > > > They are also supposed to educate their children. > > > > Yes, but

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 09:32 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Parents are *supposed* to censor what their children see. > > > > They are also supposed to educate their children. > > Yes, but it's the job of *parents* to do that. If you want me to

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Otto Wyss
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure? Anyway DpartialMirror "http://dpartialmirror.sourceforge.net/"; > > can. > > > A note of caution: > > | 2004-04-03 (wyo) Since Debian does not change its policy to add > | adequate support for rsync'ing package mirrors, I don't actively >

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Joel Aelwyn
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 05:27:11PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote: > > Am 30.01.2005 um 16:29 schrieb Marc Haber: > > >On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:54:16 +0100, Cajus Pollmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > >>I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release > >>files for a complete mirro

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Cajus Pollmeier
Am 30.01.2005 um 16:01 schrieb Thiemo Seufer: Cajus Pollmeier wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a script that regenerates Packages* and Release files for a complete mirror. Due to some installer development, I currently need to switch the mirrors during installation in order to get up to date packages. Tr

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought like you until my kids grew to an age where supervising > every waking minute of their lives is quite impossible. That's fine. If you want the rest of society to supervise your kids for you, then you'll have to pay us. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: scripts to download porn in Debian?

2005-01-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Parents are *supposed* to censor what their children see. > > They are also supposed to educate their children. Yes, but it's the job of *parents* to do that. If you want me to do it for you, you'll have to pay me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: library packaging doc...

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Schulze
Osamu Aoki wrote: > Please get it. Having DOC in CVS makes easier for proofreader to > correct things. For me, I initially got patches. But after a while, I > developed mutual trust with few people. They start fixing it with write > access sometimes later. But they always ask significant chang

Re: NEW queue and ftp-master approval

2005-01-31 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Overall, in my eyes, the question becomes: Does Debian trust DDs not > to add debs with silly names to existing sources? I recently was very mistaken about the proper way to deal with a confusing (to me) solib change, combined with a mistaken upl

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Joel Aelwyn
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 05:15:42PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Jochen Voss wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:40:05PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > >> > You forgot to quote last thing I said when closing the bug.

Te escribo de parte de Mauro tal vez te interese esto

2005-01-31 Thread Hosting321 S.A.
Hola Soy Nicolas Gonzalez División ventas de Hosting321.com.ar Me pasaron tu dirección de correo y me comentaron que tal vez te interesaría esta promo que estamos lanzando *Hosting sin Cargo por 1 mes *Registro de dominio sin cargo *Seriedad absoluta 387 Dominios aparcados y 2 años de experienci

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > I don't know that I'm one of the "relevant people", but since the issue came Sure you are, as you have a trusted path to ftp-master :) Thanks Steve. > http://ftp-master/, though, so my sig is only available by updating from a > keyserver. Done that.

Bug#258884: Bug #258884 - Got Bootsplash in debian throug patch or user space tools

2005-01-31 Thread browaeys . alban
a small update , the project is already going under debian-desktop umbrella: some developments packages: http://www.latinomixed.com/downloads/debian-embelisher/README irc channel and rationale: http://lists.debian.org/debian-desktop/2004/11/msg00015.html Cheers Alban -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread David Pashley
On Jan 31, 2005 at 15:44, Wouter Verhelst praised the llamas by saying: > Op ma, 31-01-2005 te 09:40 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson: > > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon,

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma, 31-01-2005 te 09:40 -0600, schreef Ron Johnson: > On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal de

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 15:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. > > > > If it does indeed depend on udev, how d

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:59:46PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Well, that does kill the "gnome depends on udev" stuff. But it does not > excuse hal from depending on udev. hal is designed around the hotplug system and udev, that's excuse enough I'd say ;-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, em

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:51:14PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Steve Kowalik wrote: > > >On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:21:26 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis uttered > > >>I suspect this has to do with > > >>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/test

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. > > > > If it does indeed depend on udev, how does it work un

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. > > If it does indeed depend on udev, how does it work under kernel 2.4 at all? Because that statement is utter

Hal should not depend on udev (was Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started)

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. > > > If it does indeed depend on udev, how does it work under k

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Anthony Towns wrote: > Steve Kowalik wrote: > >On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:21:26 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis uttered > >>I suspect this has to do with > >>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/Release.gpg being an > >>empty file. Stable still has a signature; what happaned? >

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 12:45:42PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. > If it does indeed depend on udev, how does it work under kernel 2.4 at all? It "depends" on udev in the sense

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Ron Johnson wrote: > Unfortunately, GNOME depends on hal, and hal depends on udev. If it does indeed depend on udev, how does it work under kernel 2.4 at all? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them.

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Anthony DeRobertis
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:05:18PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Anyway, should be fixed as of tomorrow. New key at Thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Ron Johnson
On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 11:43 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi Marco, > > On Sunday, 30 Jan 2005, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jan 30, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This breaks unrelated stuff here, so please fix it. > > I'll wait for your patch. > W

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Op ma, 31-01-2005 te 10:11 +0100, schreef Adrian von Bidder: > On Saturday 29 January 2005 18.28, Frank KÃster wrote: > > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, sean finney wrote: > > >> why not do something like this in > > >> any script that uses gettext: > > >> > >

Re: apt-secure broke?

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Anthony Towns writes: > Steve Kowalik wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:21:26 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis uttered >>>I suspect this has to do with >>>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/Release.gpg being an >>>empty file. Stable still has a signature; what happaned? >> If I remember the c

Re: Debian mirror scripts

2005-01-31 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Debmirror is purely a mirror tool. It will download the Meta files >> just like any other file. >> >> You can easily switch between mirror of equal contents but not create >> Packages files reflecting wha

Re: popcon?

2005-01-31 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:46:33PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > Hi, > > Is master just hopelessly overloaded, or is popcon defunct? I get bounces > ('warning: msg not delivered after 24h') from master. > > cheers > -- vbi > > -- > featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro Hi vbi, IIRC

popcon?

2005-01-31 Thread Adrian von Bidder
Hi, Is master just hopelessly overloaded, or is popcon defunct? I get bounces ('warning: msg not delivered after 24h') from master. cheers -- vbi -- featured link: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro pgpwfLEDQFM2a.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#292942: ITP: paramiko -- handle SSH2 connections with python

2005-01-31 Thread Guido Guenther
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: paramiko Version : 1.1 Upstream Author : Robey Pointer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.lag.net/paramiko/ * License : LGPL Description : handle SSH2 connection

Re: Bug#292759: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ma, 2005-01-31 kello 13:21 +0200, Lars Wirzenius kirjoitti: > ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti: > > Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't > > really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries -- > > unless they also happen to

Re: Bug#292759: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Lars Wirzenius
ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti: > Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't > really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries -- > unless they also happen to be binaries, PATH is just not an appropriate > place for libraries.

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Marco, On Sunday, 30 Jan 2005, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 30, Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This breaks unrelated stuff here, so please fix it. > I'll wait for your patch. What about not enableing udev per default? Lets say, you would add a /etc/def

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Jochen Voss
Hello, On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:34:17PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > >If you want to make policy that /usr/bin should only contain executables, > >go ahead, make a policy proposal, > > There is no policy issue here -- the FHS is already entirely clear on > this; /usr/bi

Re: debconf5 registration is open

2005-01-31 Thread Daniel J. Priem
Am Freitag, den 28.01.2005, 00:55 +0100 schrieb Andreas Schuldei: i ve registered on > go to http://comas.linux-aktivaattori.org/debconf5 and register. do i need to extraregister me on http://www.debconf.org/debconf5/user/register ? because the system there doesnt know me :/ regards Daniel D

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 31, David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Surely the solution is for hotplug/discover to load it during bootup. > Could hotplug use mdetect? No. The kernel should implement proper serio support (and maybe until it's done ship an aliases file which will make hotplug always load psmouse

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 31, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, so it's udev that's responsible for what IIRC is a race that can > cause X to not see the ps/2 mouse if the module is loaded as part of X's > setup? Nice design. :-P This is the *upstream* design... The official word on this is that if you manu

Re: shell script sniplets in /usr/bin?

2005-01-31 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Saturday 29 January 2005 18.28, Frank Küster wrote: > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, sean finney wrote: > >> why not do something like this in > >> any script that uses gettext: > >> > >> #!/bin/sh > >> > >> PATH=${PATH}:/usr/share/gettext/scripts > >> . gett

Re: Urgent

2005-01-31 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Friday 28 January 2005 15.49, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 28-Jan-05, 04:30 (CST), Francois Bottin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For those not speaking french, this is a nigerian scam... The first I > > have ever received in this language, albeit very poorly written. > > That's sad, because the

Re: Bug#292831: udev: udev prevents X from beeing started

2005-01-31 Thread David Pashley
On Jan 31, 2005 at 04:46, Hamish Moffatt praised the llamas by saying: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:31:03AM +0100, Joey Hess wrote: > > Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > My package works as designed, but let me know if you can design > > > something better. > > > > Oh, so it's udev that's responsible for