ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti: > Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't > really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries -- > unless they also happen to be binaries, PATH is just not an appropriate > place for libraries.
We could, at least in theory, modify shells to have an additional search path for the . command. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]