ma, 2005-01-31 kello 14:24 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
> Dude, PATH is for programs; gettext.sh is a shell library. It doesn't 
> really matter that . happens to search PATH for shell libraries -- 
> unless they also happen to be binaries, PATH is just not an appropriate 
> place for libraries.

We could, at least in theory, modify shells to have an additional search
path for the . command.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to