Hi Alexis, Thomas,
First of all I apologise for not replying in time. I'm bit occupied by
family work so not getting enough time to deal with package.
Alexis Murzeau writes:
>>
>> I also would like to highlight that what you're describing here is the
>> workflow of a transition, which is what
Alexis Murzeau writes:
> Hi,
>
> Le 27/06/2018 à 00:21, Alexis Murzeau a écrit :
>> Le 26/06/2018 à 04:13, vasudev-debian a écrit :
>>> I'll have a look. if possible clone from team repo and raise a pr on it.
>>>
>>
>> I've created 3 PR at [0], one for each branch (in this order: upstream,
>> pr
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 10:05:06PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Adrian Bunk writes:
>>
>> > In unstable this is provided by:
>> > /usr/include/fontforge/basics.h:extern void *grealloc(void *,long size);
>>
>> Yeah right
Hi Adrian,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes:
> control: tags -1 patch
>
> Hi!
>
> Attaching a debdiff for an NMU with the updated symbols for all architectures.
>
> I used the helper scripts from the pkg-kde-tools package to update the symbols
> file from the build logs from the buildds.
>
> I c
Vasudev Kamath writes:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>>
>> Hi Vasudev,
>>
>> are there any remaining problems with
>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/ctpp2/merge_requests/1
>> ?
>
> I've merged the changes. I had requested change
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille writes:
> Hi,
>
> do you see any chance to fix this soonish or do you need help. I'd
> volunteer to inject a fix into collab-maint git or upload NMU if you
> want me to.
If you can that would be great!. I'm already working on ctpp2 so I'm not
sure if I would manage pug
Hello,
Thanks for the patch, I've merged the same in the repository and
uploaded a new version.
Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Control: tag -1 +pending
Err. I forgot that being a DM I can't upload package with new
packaes. So I will wait for some one to upload the package for
me. Changes are already on collab-maint repo.
Cheers,
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e
control.in.in (forgenerating appropriate library package names).
[1]
http://blog-archive.copyninja.info/2013/05/cdbs_packaging%3A_package_relationship_management.html
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:53:35AM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> > $ debian/rules debian/control
>> > sed -e 's/__LIBPKGNAME__/libpugixml1/g' -e
>> > 's/__LIBPKGNAMEv5__/libpugixml1v5/g' > > >debian/control.i
Andreas Tille writes:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:30:23PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>>
>> DEB_MAINTAINER_MODE=1 fakeroot debian/rules debian/control
>
> Very halpful - so I added this to README.source and uploaded a
> fixed package.
>
Great! Thanks a bunch!.
Cheers,
lt;https://bugs.debian.org/736360> for details.
>
> The rest of the changes look reasonable, although I haven't built it.
Ah!. I didn't knew about this, since I saw the lintian warning I
replaced jquery with libjs-jquery. I will fix this and notify when
package is ready.
Rega
Vasudev Kamath writes:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> I had a look at it, and saw this:
>>
>>>Drop jquery.js from ctpp2-doc and depend on libjquery-js.
>>
>> If the documentation is generated by Doxygen, which it appears t
Simon McVittie writes:
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 at 14:32:59 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> I've updated the package droping libjs-jquery related modification. I've
>> pushed the changes to collab.
>
> Thanks, I've sponsored that upload for you. It should go into
On Fri Aug 28 18:10:08 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
Thanks for this.
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Aug 2015 11:37:55 GMT) :
> > Control: tag -1 -help
>
> OK. Please re-add this tag if you can't fix it in a timely manner.
On Fri Aug 28 20:04:37 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (28 Aug 2015 14:19:30 GMT) :
> > On Fri Aug 28 18:10:08 2015 GMT+0530, intrigeri wrote:
> >> OK. Please re-add this tag if you can't fix it in a timely manner.
>
> > Act
nnector for the external monitor.
>
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 10:36:59 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Closing laptop lid normally puts laptop sleep and I get back my session on
>> reopen. But after recent update
>> I see that I get logged out and closer inspection revealed
Hi Moritz,
Moritz Mühlenhoff writes:
>
> Hi Vasudev,
>
> https://github.com/tahoe-lafs/pycryptopp/issues/36#issuecomment-504130020
> states:
>
> | The Tahoe-LAFS project has decided it is not interested in porting
> | pycryptopp to Python 3. Instead, Tahoe-LAFS is switching to the
> | "cryptogra
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29)
>> Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a écrit :
>> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 16:06:27)
>> > > A quick summary of the differences between both repos:
>> >
>> > Thanks, that is no doubt h
Michel Le Bihan writes:
> Le mardi 22 décembre 2020 à 17:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamath a écrit :
>> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>>
>> > Quoting Michel Le Bihan (2020-12-20 17:15:29)
>> > > Le dimanche 20 décembre 2020 à 16:50 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard a
>> &g
Michel Le Bihan writes:
> Hello,
>
> I opened a merge request, but merging all branches into your repo
> might cause issues in the upstream branch in the future due to the
> merge commits. Instead, it will be best to pull all branches from my
> repo into branches of your repo, but without adding
Hi Adrian,
Adrian Bunk writes:
> Source: bpfcc
> Version: 0.17.0-7
> Severity: serious
> Tags: ftbfs
>
> This might be due to the LLVM 9 -> 11 transition,
> or for other reasons.
>
> The general problem of shipping symbols files for C++ code
> is discussed at https://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbo
Hi Alberto,
> I have checked that current upstream (9.0) builds flawlessly, and made
> my release available at https://salsa.debian.org/aluaces-guest/biboumi
> .
That is great.
> Can I be sponsored so we can upload to at least experimental?
Sure, please raise a merge request against biboumi a
o and it installed without any issue.
This probably is some issue local to your system. Did you run apt-get
update before trying to install the package?.
Since I can not reproduce the issue I've lowered the severity.
Best Regards,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
James Clarke writes:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> These symbol files differences have been fixed by Ubuntu. I came to an
> identical patch independently before being told about it. I have also
> performed some additional cleanup where things are clearly based on
> bitness or endianness, which are
Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> In unstable this is provided by:
> /usr/include/fontforge/basics.h:extern void *grealloc(void *,long size);
>
Yeah right, but its no longer provided in new fontforge. Upstream also
mentioned same.
Source: pdf2htmlex
Severity: serious
User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fontforge-transition
Dear Maintainer,
pdf2htmlex fails to build with new fontforge uploaded to unstable. The build
logs can be found here ¹. This mainly happening due to use of
*library_version_configurat
Control: tag -1 + unreproducible moreinfo
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Karthik,
Kartik Mistry writes:
> Package: fontforge
> Version: 1:20161005~dfsg-4
> Severity: serious
>
> ~/ fontforge
> fontforge: error while loading shared libraries: libgif.so.4: cannot open
> shared object file: N
Hi James,
On 17-Aug-2017 22:45, "James Clarke" wrote:
Source: zimlib
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Once again zimlib FTBFS due to symbols file diffs. Please at least *try*
to get a working symbols file; you can at least build amd64 locally, and
we have porterboxen for a reason...
I k
Control: reassign -1 libfontforge-dev
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2907
Johannes Schauer writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 17:55:28 +0530 Vasudev Kamath
> wrote:
>> pdf2htmlex FTBFS with new version of fontforge (currently in exper
Hello Yamane San,
Hideki Yamane writes:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 13:12:54 +0530
> Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> mensis fails to build from source with fontforge version 20161005 from
>> experimental. It fails in the configure step with following error
>>
>> checkin
Sandro Tosi writes:
>
> I've prepared an NMU for zfec (versioned as 1.5.2-2.1). The diff
> is attached to this message.
Thanks Sandro. I've merged your patch into Git.
Cheers,
Vasudev
Package: glances
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: Renders glances use less
Dear Maintainer,
I installed glances from Debian repository and when trying to launch It crashes
with following stack trace
Error while initializing the ip plugin ('NoneType' object has no attribute
'spli
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Echeverry writes:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 11:25:05PM -0500, Daniel Echeverry wrote:
>> tags 948404 + moreinfo unreproducible
>> thanks
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Thanks for your report! Unfortunately I can't reproduce this bug, I install
>> glances via ap-get install and works fine
Control: fixed -1 0.25.0+ds-1
Hi Sudip,
Thanks for the report new upstream release is fixing this issue and I've
already uploaded new version and is building fine against all release
architecture. So closing this bug.
Thanks and Regards,
Vasudev
Hi all,
First of all sorry for mess I created. I made a silly mistake of not
updating the links file properly before upload. I'm rectifying it now
and will upload the fixed version ASAP.
Second I noted that from the bug report by Antonio that the usage
patterns have changed a lot between 4 and 5
Hi Antonio,
Antonio Terceiro writes:
> Package: fonts-font-awesome
> Version: 5.0.10-1
> Severity: grave
>
> Font-Awesome version completely changed everything, and any web
> applications that use it are now broken unless they go through some
> manual intervention.
>
> https://fontawesome.com/h
Hi Antonio,
Antonio Terceiro writes:
> Control: forwarded -1
> https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-font-awesome/merge_requests/1
>
> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 06:15:08PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> Control: reopen -1
>>
>> On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 10
Pierre-Elliott Bécue writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm maintaining HyperKitty, and it relies on fontawesome-webfont.ttf and
> FontAwesome.otf from the v4 version. To avoid shipping the files with the
> package, I linked them from the debian's one in d/rules. (see [1])
>
> Do we agree that there is no backw
Hi Thomas,
I read through and prepared a version to experimental which symlinks
fa-solid-900.ttf as fontawesome-webfont.ttf. I've uploaded it to
experimental, can you please check if this helps?.
@Others Please let me know if this new version in experimental with
suggestion from Thomas improves
Hideki Yamane writes:
> On Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:16:22 +0200
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> Btw, any plan to do as well an unstable upload?
>
> I'm on Uploaders list, but cannot manipulate current fontforge source repo
> since it changes packaging style to cdbs and make changes in master branc
Package: biboumi
Version: 6.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
>From the newer version of biboumi, it needs /var/lib/biboumi directory
to be existing to start the service. This probably changed during version
5.0 or 6.0 (not sure which exactly as I found issue in 6.0).
Please create /var/lib
Hi Louiz,
Florent Le Coz writes:
> On 10/02/2017 06:01 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Package: biboumi
>> Version: 6.0-1
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> Dear Maintainer,
>>
>> From the newer version of biboumi, it needs /var/lib/biboumi directory
>>
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:42:19PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo +unreproducible
>>
>> Adam Borowski writes:
>> > Source: ctpp2
>> > Version: 2.8.3-23
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> > I&#
Adam Borowski writes:
>> Yeah. Since you mentioned its random can we reduce the severity of the
>> bug?.
>
> Bad idea, as it fails a lot: on my armhf box, 17/20 times, on my amd64, 6/12
> times.
>
> Turn out, the problem is not that sometimes it fails. The wrongness it that
> it doesn't fail whe
Sorry for the delayed response here. I let the package to fall of from
testing as upstream does not yet any support for building python3.
Though currently there is some work going on for supporting python3 in
upstream, I'm not sure of ETA of the procedure.
Will reintroduce the package once upstr
Source: mensis
Severity: serious
User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fontforge-transition
Dear Maintainer,
mensis fails to build from source with fontforge version 20161005 from
experimental. It fails in the configure step with following error
checking fontforge/basics.h usab
Source: pdf2htmlex
Severity: serious
User: pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fontforge-transition
Dear Maintainer,
pdf2htmlex FTBFS with new version of fontforge (currently in experimental).
Below is the snippet of log showing the error.
/encoding.cc
[ 47%] Building C object CMak
mon 3.4.2-5
libgtk-3-bin recommends no packages.
libgtk-3-bin suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key:
iceweasel
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 18:55 Thu 10 Jan , Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 10.01.2013 18:25, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> > Package: libgtk-3-bin
> > Version: 3.4.2-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > When trying to upgrade from 3.4.2-4 to 3.4.2-5 I get following error and
> > aptitude ab
;
Yes doing this now everything is fine upgrade happened and package
manager is in normal state. I guess we can close this bug now
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.n
ft
back!
>
> I tried to reproduce these steps on my system and got no crash. I am
> therefore tagging as unreproducible for now.
>
After following Michael's instruction the upgrade was successful and I
guess we can close the bug now
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.in
ause multiple packages depend on it.
[1] http://hg.suckless.org/slock/diff/0eade055cef0/slock.c
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/11/msg3.html
Warm Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: co
tag 692737 +moreinfo
severity 692737 important
thanks
Downgrading the bug until more information about the bug is received
from the author.
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev
[1]
http://git.falconpl.org/cgit.cgi/falcon/commit/?id=93d94a88a8bb073e609327ceca704b313e1309ff
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
ture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
>
>
>
> ___
> Pkg-ruby-extras-ma
Control: reassign -1 texlive-lang-indic 2014.20141024-1
thanks
Since latex-sanskrit is now a transitional dummy package and
texlive-lang-indic is the package which is shipping the files which are
mentioned in this bug report, I'm hereby reassigning it to
texlive-lang-indic.
Cheers,
--
Va
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> You are right, its a typo. We never built a binary called
>> fonts-android. I've fixed this in git, I've kept it in unreleased state
>> so some one can push it to the archive
Hi,
Vasudev Kamath writes:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, intrigeri wrote:
>> On current sid, with texlive-lang-indic installed:
>>
>> $ t1disasm
>> /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/type1/public/sanskrit/sktb10.pfb | grep
>> start
>> dup 3 {sy
see any
> evidence that the source packages fonts-droid or fronts-android ever
> built a fonts-android package.
You are right, its a typo. We never built a binary called
fonts-android. I've fixed this in git, I've kept it in unreleased state
so some one can push it to the archive an
Sorry lost track again! Will discuss this with release team
today. Thanks for reminding :)
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
intrigeri writes:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (14 Aug 2014 08:12:31 GMT) :
>> Its no longer part of Debian-IN team, now its transitional package part
>> of TexLive, thanks to Debian-Tex maintainers (Norbert specifically) [1]
>
> OK, fair enough. The RC bug (
intrigeri writes:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (02 Oct 2014 05:23:48 GMT) :
>> Well probably bug should be closed, because the new package is just
>> transitional package and doesn't have any source in it which was the
>> reason for this bug report.
>
till holds right but not sure if
it should be reassigned to texlive-lang src or kept on latex-sanskrit.
Also bug is ignored for jessie!.
Sorry for not including this earlier conversation. I had to re-read it
to understand the concept
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyni
Hi Dkg,
Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian
experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I
did not find exact license text you posted.
Since I became the new maintainer of fontforge, this bug popped up on my
Maintainer Dashboard :-). So wondering i
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> Hi Vasudev--
>
> On Sat 2016-07-30 03:17:01 -0400, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
>> Do you still find this problem in latest fontforge in Debian
>> experimental?.. I did a quick search in fontforge/othersubrs.c file I
>> did not find exact
Guillem Jover writes:
> Package: librem0
> Version: 0.4.7-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi!
>
> This package provides a shared library that is not self-contained, and
> it is missing a run-time dependency on libre0, as it uses some of its
> symbols. The library should link against all libraries it us
Control: tag -1 +confirmed
Hi Guillem,
Need some help here.
Guillem Jover writes:
> Package: librem0
> Version: 0.4.7-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi!
>
> This package provides a shared library that is not self-contained, and
> it is missing a run-time dependency on libre0, as it uses some of its
Control: tag -1 +pending
Hi,
I've applied a patch which fixes this issue and pushed the changes to
pkg-multimedia repo. I would need some one to upload this to archive.
Best Regards
Control: tag -1 +confirmed
Hi Martin,
I can reproduce this bug what surprises me is that compile file is
present in the source and still the error is given out.
Is it because compile file provided by upstream is older version?. I've
no idea on how to resolve this bug so any hints suggestions a
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619246
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 652186 + upstream
tag 652186 + confirmed
thanks
--
Vasudev Kamath
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tag 652243 +upstream
tag 652243 +confirmed
thanks
This is an upstream bug because of use of update-openoffice-dict which
is removed from debian we have notified the upstream.
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I tried to build surf_0.4.1-4.1 on clean chroot using pbuilder and I
could build this package successfully. I'm attaching build log for
reference. Please let me know if this bug still exists as I'm planning
to do a QA upload for this
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
dpkg-chec
because when I was trying
to build the package with tests enabled first time it was throwing
error complaining bcrypt.h file is not found. This is error was thrown
from the file ext/mri/bcrypt_ext.c file. To fix this line was added.
Is it building fine without this line?
Regards
--
Vasudev
Hi,
I'm one of the uploader of Kiwix and I just checked the base64.h of
both package and they seems to be 2 different files with same name,
I'm trying to contact the upstream to see if this file can be renamed
in Kiwix.
I've not yet contacted heimdal maintainers
With Regards
--
ritical side effect.
renaud
___
Debian-edu-pkg-team mailing list
debian-edu-pkg-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-edu-pkg-team
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
copyninja@{frndk.de|vasudev.homelinux.net}
--
To UNSUBSCR
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 09:04 Sat 25 Aug , Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Vasudev Kamath , 2012-08-25, 12:09:
> >There is a Source: field in the copyright pointing to the upstream
> >website,
>
> FWIW, copyright file for suckless-tools 38-1 has no such field.
Ah yes that source is very old even befo
rch] Erreur 2
>
Well I used pkg-kde-tools to generate symbols file I thought it should
work but looks like that is only for KDE libs. Let me check how I can
fix this.
Thanks for the report.
Cheers!
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.hom
On 16:55 Mon 16 Sep , Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Montag, den 16.09.2013, 20:16 +0530 schrieb Vasudev Kamath:
> > Well I used pkg-kde-tools to generate symbols file I thought it should
> > work but looks like that is only for KDE libs. Let me check how I can
> > fix thi
On 16:22 Mon 16 Sep , pkg-fonts-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> tag 722991 + pending
> thanks
>
> Some bugs in the libspiro package are closed in revision
> acb0cf1ab38866868fb056fee9444e33479f81da in branch 'master' by
> Vasudev Kamath
>
> T
this bug report. Also ccing my AM intrigeri as I'm doing
this as part of my NM process.
PS: Also this is first time I'm attempting to do an NMU so if there is
any issues please let me know.
[1] https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/bugged/xmail_1.27-1.1+b1.log
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://
ffs and provide
build logs.
Or if there is any otherway please let me know.
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4
cess but not got any reply from them still.
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) :
> >> It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks
> >> /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it
> >> should do the contrary, right
On 11:21 Sat 19 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (19 Oct 2013 05:59:12 GMT) :
> >> It seems to me that the attached patch symlinks
> >> /usr/share/xmail/sample to /usr/share/doc/xmail/sample (while it
> >> should do the contrary, right
package. Also since its not really copyright
statement but string declared inside the code can you please reconsider
about this bug report
Cheers,
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net
On 10:33 Wed 16 Oct , intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vasudev Kamath wrote (22 Sep 2013 07:52:26 GMT) :
> > I went through the log and prepared an NMU for fixing the policy issue,
> > as mentioned in Debian policy document I symlinked the sample folder
> > under /usr/sh
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/kohler/lcdf-typetools/issues/10
Me and Jonas had a discussion where jonas mentioned
tool distributes non-DFSG code embedded as template code for others to compile
when creating fonts with this tool
...and distributing non-DFSG code is forbidden, no mat
Control: tag -1 +help
Ralf Treinen writes:
> Hi again,
>
> sorry but this is not fixed in fonts-android/1:6.0.1r3-1 :
>
> Selecting previously unselected package fonts-droid.
> (Reading database ... 10935 files and directories currently installed.)
> Preparing to unpack .../fonts-droid_1%3a4.4.4
Ralf Treinen writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 10:45:54AM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
>> I'm just wondering why Breaks and Replaces is not having any affect. Or
>> do I need conflicts relation here?
>>
>> Any case any suggestion or help is app
Simon McVittie writes:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 at 16:55:47 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>> Ralf Treinen writes:
>> > The version constraints on your Breaks and Replaces do not match the
>> > current version of fonts-droid, which is 1:4.4.4r2-7 :
>> >
>&g
Vasudev Kamath writes:
>>
>> but that seems non-ideal to me: if there was an NMU 1:4.4.4r2-7.1
>> based on 1:4.4.4r2-7, then it would presumably still have shipped
>> DroidSansFallback.ttf and so on, so it cannot be co-installed
>> with 1:6.0.0r26-1.
>
>
Matteo F. Vescovi writes:
> tag 804678 pending
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Bug #804678 reported by you has been fixed in the Git repository. You can
> see the changelog below, and you can check the diff of the fix at:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/blender.git;a=commitdiff;h=cd15e53
Control: tag -1 +confirmed
Ralf Treinen writes:
>
> automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
> same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
> detected the following problem:
>
>
> Selecting previously unselected package fonts-droid.
> (Rea
Hi Dmitry,
fonts-android no longer ships the affected files, so I'm closing this
bug now.
fonts-droid is in testing has these files, but I guess when
fonts-droid-fallback migrates to testing it will automatically gets
removed from archive, since fonts-droid is no longer built by
fonts-android so
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov writes:
> Source: fonts-android
> Version: 1:4.4.4r2-7
> Severity: serious
>
> File "DroidNaskhUI-Regular.ttf" contains the following metadata:
>
>
>Digitized data copyright © 2006, 2012 Google Corporation.
>
> NOTIFICATION OF LICENSE AGREEMENT
>
> Th
Hi Axel,
If you can upload I'll be happy as Jonas is busy
Axel Beckert wrote:
>Hi Vasudev,
>
>Vasudev Kamath wrote on 21-Apr-2013:
>> Control: tag -1 +pending
>>
>> Thanks Aron for reporting. I've prepared a fix and will be uploaded
>soon
>
>
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
