Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> writes:

>> Yeah. Since you mentioned its random can we reduce the severity of the
>> bug?.
>
> Bad idea, as it fails a lot: on my armhf box, 17/20 times, on my amd64, 6/12
> times.
>
> Turn out, the problem is not that sometimes it fails.  The wrongness it that
> it doesn't fail when it should.
>
> Did you notice these syntax errors from dot that are found in your log as
> well?  They didn't happen on official buildds five months ago.  I dismissed
> them as they _usually_ are ignored, but it turns out that sometimes, with a
> low probability, they do cause FTBFS.  There's quite a bunch of those syntax
> errors, though, so even though every one is unlikely to cause a failure, the
> overall chance is high.

Thing is this package is never updated for quite long time. May be
things changed in Doxygen ?

>
>
> So, the real bug is dot ignoring these errors.  Not only this causes problem
> like intermittent failures here, it's also against the Policy (which
> requires errors to be detected as a "must" clause), and common sense -- as
> the docs get corrupted in random ways.
>
>
> As for the errors themselves, an example:
>   Node12 
> [label="CTPP::CTPP2JSONParser\l::IsString",height=0.2,width=0.4,color="black",
>  fillcolor="white", 
> style="filled",URL="$a01311.xhtml#a9a4c251b78ce957f7e6cd9bc12ecbb6a",tooltip="JSON
>  string \"blah-blah \\" clah-clah \" | &#39;blah-blah \&#39; clah-clah &#39;. 
> "];
> note 「\\"」 -- ie, an unescaped quotation mark.
>
>
> I don't know graphviz enough to point the blame either at it or the way
> ctpp2's build system calls it, I suspect the former, though.  Which would
> mean reassigning to graphviz.  Not sure what's the cause and severity of the
> unescaped quote; ignoring errors is definitely RC, though.

Same here. I see 2 possibility, as you said re-assign bug to graphviz or
I drop building ctpp2-doc package itself. ctpp2 is only used by one
package related kiwix and no one else. So dropping doc package should
not cause any problem. What do you think?.

Meow,

Reply via email to