Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > Package: fonts-droid > Version: 1:4.4.4r2-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: If it is a typo, it breaks conffile handling > > Hi, > > The following snippet was discovered in an automatic upgrade test on > jenkins.debian.net[1] > > """ > Preparing to replace fonts-droid 20111207+git-1 (using > .../fonts-droid_1%3a4.4.4r2-4_all.deb) ... > dpkg-query: no packages found matching fonts-android > Obsolete conffile /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-droid-sans-fonts.conf has been > modified by you. > Saving as /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-droid-sans-fonts.conf.dpkg-bak ... > Unpacking replacement fonts-droid ... > """ > > When reviewing the package's maintscript file[2], the last line uses > "fonts-android" rather than "fonts-droid". However, I cannot see any > evidence that the source packages fonts-droid or fronts-android ever > built a fonts-android package.
You are right, its a typo. We never built a binary called fonts-android. I've fixed this in git, I've kept it in unreleased state so some one can push it to the archive and file a unblock request. (I hope its valid candidate for unblock request.). Cheers, -- Vasudev Kamath http://copyninja.info Connect on ~friendica: copyni...@samsargika.copyninja.info IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net} GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
