Bug#355979: Patch

tag 355979 patch thanks The attached patch adds a build-dependency on libxpm-dev, which contains xpm.h. -- Matt diff -ru gnome-iconedit-1.2.0-orig/debian/control gnome-iconedit-1.2.0/debian/control --- gnome-iconedit-1.2.0-orig/debian/control2006-03-14 23:41:57.0 -0800 +++ gnome-ic

Bug#356044: Patch

tag 356044 patch thanks The attached patch implements Daniel's suggestion and adds a space before each backslash, which fixes the build. -- Matt diff -ru dict-foldoc-20030919-orig/debian/rules dict-foldoc-20030919/debian/rules --- dict-foldoc-20030919-orig/debian/rules 2006-03-14 23:39:44.

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 356044 patch Bug#356044: dict-foldoc: FTBFS with current make There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian B

Processed: Patch

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 355979 patch Bug#355979: FTBFS: error: X11/xpm.h: No such file or directory There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administr

Bug#356996: FTBFS (alpha/ia64): nsample hangs

Package: chicken Version: 2.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: no longer builds from source chicken fails to build on alpha and ia64: [...] /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -export-dynamic -o nsample -static nsample.o libchicken.la -ldl -lm gcc -O2 -o nsample nsample.o -Wl,--export-dyn

Processed: found 349807 in 2.0.7-7

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > found 349807 2.0.7-7 Bug#349807: towitoko: [m68k, arm, s390] FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/lib/libtowitoko.so': No such file or directory Bug marked as found in version 2.

Bug#346019: marked as done (Does not show up)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:18:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line trayer: Does not show up has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsib

Bug#356939: marked as done (d-i/base-config can include sensative info in world-readable log files; needs cleanup by passwd)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:17:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356939: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.14-9 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

severity 343250 important thanks Since this bug apparently only affects compression of win32 PE executables, and not ordinary Linux ELF executables, I think it's fair to say that the package is not rendered "mostly unusable". Downgrading the bug accordingly. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek

Processed: Re: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 343250 important Bug#343250: upx-ucl-beta: broken on 64-bit systems Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Processed: found 340842 in 0.30, tagging 340842

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > found 340842 0.30 Bug#340842: unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives Bug marked as found in version 0.30. > tags 340842 - etch sarge sid Bug#340842: unalz: buffer overflow w

Bug#340842: marked as done (unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:37:19 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#348765: vm-bonus-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot

severity 348765 important thanks Since emacs-snapshot is not a candidate for release, this bug is not release-critical regardless of the package responsible if it's specific to the emacs-snapshot flavor. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Develop

Processed: Re: vm-bonus-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 348765 important Bug#348765: vm-bonus-el: postinst failure with emacs-snapshot Severity set to `important'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator,

Bug#357004: freej: FTBFS: missing build dependencies

Package: freej Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi, building the package freej in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] if i486-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../..

Bug#207932: To be fixed, truce, peace

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting "Janusz S. Bień" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [...] > > I will manage, but the integration of documentation with the program > > seems to me an intrinsic feature of Emacs. Remember this is The > > Extensible, Customizable, *Self-

Bug#357005: libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8: does not works: missing dependencies

Package: libgtk-mozembed-ruby1.8 Version: 0.3.1-4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi! this package is not working because of missing dependencies. The ldd on /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/powerpc-linux/gtkmozembed.so has the following missing libraries: libgtkembedmoz

Bug#207932: To be fixed, truce, peace

Quoting "Janusz S. Bieñ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Self-Documentating has nothing to do with info manuals. It is about > > docstrings: they will still be around, within the DOC file. > > You are of course right in the technical and literal sense. However I > still believe that separating the info f

Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink

tag 356984 + pending thanks Philipp Weis wrote: > I just tried to install openoffice.org-gcj, and got the following: > > | Setting up openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ... > | /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line 7: > /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: No such file or directory > | find:

Processed: Re: Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 356984 + pending Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system admi

Processed: fix with new upstream release

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > package davfs2 Ignoring bugs not assigned to: davfs2 > tags 356963 + patch pending Bug#356963: FTBFS: libneon24-dev no longer in the archive There were no tags set. Tags added: patch, pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if yo

Bug#356963: fix with new upstream release

package davfs2 tags 356963 + patch pending thanks Hi Martin, Luciano and Luk, I have noted Luciano back then about the neon transition. He said that only the new upstream version fixes this (confirmed) and he is doing a package out of it. I haven't heard about him since then, not even for my sec

Processed: Re: Bug#273800: fixed in libnss-pgsql 1.3-0.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 273800 Bug#273800: libnss-pgsql: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-3.4): lowlevellock.h: no such file or directory Bug#298247: libnss-pgsql: Uses non-exported libc interface. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > tags 273800 + fixed Bug#273800: libnss-pgsql:

Bug#318546: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure

reopen 318546 thanks Hi, I can reproduce this both on my development machine's current sid environment and in a current pbuilder i386 chroot. bye, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 318546 Bug#318546: libproc-process-perl: FTBFS: Test failure Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bug

Bug#340842: acknowledged by developer (Re: unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives)

> This bug was fixed in a security upload to stable; marking as closed in that > version. > > The bug appears to still apply to the version of the package in unstable, > and is marked as such. The bug looks closed to me. // Ulf -- ___ Surf the Web

Bug#357009: tramp: FTBFS: texi2dvi / etex error

Package: tramp Version: 1:2.0.52-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package tramp in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] [EMAIL PROTECTED]@@real.host} | [37] Overfull \hbox (59.28749pt

Bug#356756: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev

Hi Christian, Am Montag, den 13.03.2006, 23:51 +0100 schrieb Christian Hammers: > Package: rate-engine > Severity: serious > Usertag: transition-libmysqlclient15-dev > > Dear maintainer > > Please upgrade the build dependencies of your package to use > libmysqlclient15-dev > > as the othe

Bug#356756: Please upgrade build depends to libmysqlclient15-dev

Hi On 2006-03-15 Kilian Krause wrote: > Well, the updated b-d is added already, yet compilation fails with: > > make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rate-engine-0.5.5' > cc -O3 -W -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g > -fno-inline-functions -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include

Bug#357011: rails: FTBFS: rake error

Package: rails Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package rails in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] cp helpers/test_helper.rb /tmp/buildd/rails-1.0.0/railties/../bui

Bug#355597: Fix and NMU

tags 355597 patch thanks Hi, The attached patch fixes the build dependency problem. I will do an NMU (as part of my NM process) with this patch very soon unless you respond to this bug. Regards, -- Mattias Nordstrom --- wmail-2.0.orig/debian/control 2006-03-15 12:32:01.0 +0200 +++ wma

Bug#356963: fix with new upstream release

Hi Laszlo Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: > package davfs2 > tags 356963 + patch pending > thanks > > Hi Martin, Luciano and Luk, > > I have noted Luciano back then about the neon transition. He said that > only the new upstream version fixes this (confirmed) and he is doing a > package out of it. I

Bug#354146: x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common

Hi! Does really nobody care about this serious bug - it hinders very much testing of upgrades from sarge to etch. Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: x11-common > Version: 1:7.0.0 > Severity: grave > > After login in a sarge chroot, I installed tetex-bin (probably that can > be mu

Bug#356963: marked as done (FTBFS: libneon24-dev no longer in the archive)

d, or > is only available from another source > apt-get failed. > Package installation failed > Trying to reinstall removed packages: > Trying to uninstall newly installed packages: > Source-dependencies not satisfied; skipping davfs2 > **

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 355597 patch Bug#355597: FTBFS: cannot find -lX11 There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs databas

Bug#356555: writes session files insecurely to /tmp; symlink attacks and data exposure

On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 01:07:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Hello, A patch is attached which should fix several holes. This patch was created against 4.07. Please read the following comments. > Package: libcgi-session-perl > Version: 4.03-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > Hole 1: > > CGI:

Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-installation script fails

Package: openoffice.org-gcj Version: 2.0.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi there! Today I installed openoffice.org-gcj (since some other OO package recommended it). apt-get outputs this: --- Setting up: openoffice.org-gcj (2.0.2-1) ...

Bug#356555: marked as done (writes session files insecurely to /tmp; symlink attacks and data exposure)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:47:08 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356555: fixed in libcgi-session-perl 4.07-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#357028: libdumb: FTBFS: library missing

Package: libdumb Version: 1:0.9.3-1 Severity: serious Hi, building the package libdumb in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] gcc -Iinclude -Wall -W -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes

Bug#355597: marked as done (FTBFS: cannot find -lX11)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 04:02:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#355597: fixed in wmail 2.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#357030: latex-ucs: FTBFS: makeunidef.pl running out of memory

Package: latex-ucs Version: 20041017-2 Severity: serious Hi, building the package latex-ucs in a clean sid build environment (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: = [...] install -d debian/tmp/data # automatically generate def

Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-installation script fails

merge 357024 356984 thanks Csillag Kristof wrote: > /var/lib/dpkg/info/openoffice.org-gcj.postinst: line > 7: /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/gcj: No such file or directory [...] Already reported as 356984. Will be fixed in next upload. Fix is to use gij instead of gcj (but needs some other changes, to

Processed: Re: Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-installation script fails

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 357024 356984 Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink Bug#357024: openoffice.org-gcj: post-installation script fails Merged 356984 357024. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assi

Bug#357036: cjk-latex: missing or incorrect dependency?

Package: cjk-latex Version: 4.5.1-4.1 Severity: serious Justification: installation fails When testing cjk-latex with piuparts, I got the following error: Setting up cjk-latex (4.5.1-4.1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/cjk-latex.postinst: line 13: /usr/bin/kpsewhich: No such file or directory dpkg:

Bug#357037: itrans-fonts: missing dependency?

Package: itrans-fonts Version: 5.3-3 Severity: serious Justification: installation fails When testing itrans-fonts with piuparts, I get the following error: Setting up itrans-fonts (5.3-3) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/itrans-fonts.postinst: line 7: mktexlsr: command not found dpkg: error processi

Bug#357038: CVE-2006-0024 addresses several security vulnerabilities

Package: flashplugin-nonfree Version: 7.0.61-3 Severity: critical -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Adobe announced the following security bulletin regarding Flash player: http://www.macromedia.com/devnet/security/security_zone/apsb06-03.html Please have a look at it. In acco

Bug#356975: FTBFS: Can't locate PDL/Config.pm

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 03:32:39AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: pdl > Version: 1:2.4.2-4 > Severity: serious > > pdl fails to build because it cannot find PDL/Config.pm: > > > Automatic build of pdl_1:2.4.2-4 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 > ... > > Manifying ../blib/man3/PDL.3pm > >

Bug#321057: intend to NMU

Hi, I've created a patch, fixing: #321057 "FTBFS: elmo.inc: No such file or directory" #318291 "CAN-2005-2230 temporary file vulnerability" #349191 "elmo: potential segfault" I had to fix the 3rd bug since elmo *always* segfaulted on my box, so I was not able to test my bugfixes 1 and 2. The pa

Bug#356850: marked as done (initramfs-tools: upon udev upgrade, system becomes unbootable if using lilo)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 06:47:13 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356850: fixed in initramfs-tools 0.55b has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: patch available

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 318291 patch Bug#318291: CAN-2005-2230 temporary file vulnerability Tags were: security Tags added: patch > tags 321057 patch Bug#321057: FTBFS: elmo.inc: No such file or directory Tags were: patch Tags added: patch > tags 349191 patch Bug#349191

Bug#357087: FTBFS: missing build dependency on bzip2

Package: eclipse Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hi, building eclipse fails on all of the buildds due to a missing build-dependency on bzip2 to unpack the source. mkdir -p "/build/buildd/eclipse-3.1.2/source-tree" (cd "/build/buildd/eclipse-3.1.2/source-tree" && tar xfj ../"upstream/

Processed: reopen

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 340842 Bug#340842: unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, D

Processed: Re: Bug#357067: openoffice.org-gcj: installation problems: gcj: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 357067 grave Bug#357067: openoffice.org-gcj: installation problems: gcj: No such file or directory Severity set to `grave'. > merge 356984 357024 357067 Bug#356984: openoffice.org-gcj: Uninstallable because of missing gcj symlink Bug#357024:

Bug#357103: Setting up debtags fails - missing package-tags.tmp

Package: debtags Version: 1.5.4 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hello, installing debtags fails with: Setting up debtags (1.5.4) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/debtags/sources.list ... debtags: FileException: No such file or directory renaming /var/lib/de

Bug#357087: FTBFS: missing build dependency on bzip2

tag 357087 pending confirmed thanks On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:54:09PM +0100, Guido Guenther wrote: > Package: eclipse > Version: 3.1.2-1 > Severity: grave > Tags: patch > > Hi, > building eclipse fails on all of the buildds due to a missing > build-dependency on bzip2 to unpack the source. > >

Processed: Re: Bug#357087: FTBFS: missing build dependency on bzip2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 357087 pending confirmed Bug#357087: FTBFS: missing build dependency on bzip2 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending, confirmed > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#349316: marked as done (kaddressbook: Looses all kontacts when shutting down)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:02:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line kaddressbook: Looses all kontacts when shutting down has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the c

Processed: found 357038 in 7.0.25-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > found 357038 7.0.25-5 Bug#357038: CVE-2006-0024 addresses several security vulnerabilities Bug marked as found in version 7.0.25-5. > End of message, stopping processing here. Pleas

Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024

Package: flashplayer-mozilla Version: 7.0.61.0-0.2 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: security hole Adobe issued APSB06-03 which describes flaws in Flash Player < 7.0.63.0. This is CVE-2006-0024. -- System Inf

Bug#357106: alsaconf modifies modules.conf unrelatedly

Package: alsa-utils Version: 1.0.8-4 Severity: grave (note, I'm running Sarge) Running alsaconf, my modules.conf was modified: -alias net-pf-10 off# IPv6 +# alias net-pf-10 off # IPv6 It did ask for modification of modules.conf, but not to actually enable IPv6 on my machine

Bug#349794: Patch, CVE number

On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Martin Pitt wrote: > I took a stab at this bug; granted, it's not the worst one in the > world, but it should be fixed eventually. > > This is the patch I used for the Ubuntu security update: > > http://patches.ubuntu.com/patches/unzip.CVE-2005-4667.diff > > It works for

Bug#356810: Serious bug in security update for Crypt::CBC

Hi all! Sorry to be jumping in without preserving the In-Reply-To. Allard Hoeve wrote: >I'm afraid this new package introduces some serious errors in software >that depends on this package. I have tested the new package on three >different Sarge machines with the following results. Please repro

Bug#356853: More of them...

Ulrik Vieth has uploaded the concmath fonts to CTAN, plus a LaTeX style file to use them, but only the latter has a license statement (in its README file). I intend to contact once I've verified there are no other unclear files from him in teTeX. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Sp

Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024

* Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 17:34]: > Package: flashplayer-mozilla > Version: 7.0.61.0-0.2 Where did you get this package from? It's not in Debian. What does dpkg -p flashplayer-mozilla | grep Maintainer say? -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024

Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 17:34]: >> Package: flashplayer-mozilla >> Version: 7.0.61.0-0.2 > > Where did you get this package from? It's not in Debian. > > What does > dpkg -p flashplayer-mozilla | grep Maintainer > say? Damn, Marillat strikes aga

Bug#356935: marked as done (lurker - FTBFS: Missing build-dependency: dpatch)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:02:12 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356935: fixed in lurker 2.1-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#356853: [Karl Berry] bbm fonts

--- Begin Message --- FYI, I got an answer right away from Gilles Robert about the bbm fonts, and I hope a new readme file (at least) will be uploaded soon specifically stating some free license terms or another. --- End Message --- -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding

Processed: closing 340842

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > close 340842 0.30.1 Bug#340842: unalz: buffer overflow when extracting archives 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug marked as fixed in version

Bug#357115: Makes other packages FTBFS: et/com_err.h: No such file or directory

Package: heimdal Version: 0.7.2-1 Severity: serious It seems you're missing a depends on comerr-dev. > Automatic build of libpam-heimdal_1.0-19 on bigsur by sbuild/mips 1.94 ... > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5.0.2), heimdal-dev (>= 0.3e-1), libpam0g-dev, > dpatch (>= 2.0.0) > Checking for alre

Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024

* Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 18:23]: > >> Package: flashplayer-mozilla > >> Version: 7.0.61.0-0.2 > > > > Where did you get this package from? It's not in Debian. ... > Damn, Marillat strikes again... I thought this was the new flash plugin > recently discussed on mentors. Sorry!

Bug#357105: marked as done (flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:32:33 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: Fixed in NMU of drivel 2.0.2-5.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 337872 + fixed Bug#337872: FTBFS (alpha): invalid va_list* usage Tags were: patch Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs da

Bug#354146: x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > dpkg: error processing > > /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb (--unpack): > > trying to overwrite `/etc/X11/Xsession', which is also in package > > xfree86-common > > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by sig

Bug#354146: workaround

doing the following will workaround the problem: dpkg --force-depends --remove xfree86-common apt-get update apt-get install x11-common Regards, Bas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#356682: Retitling bug

severity 356682 whishlist retitle 356682 ia32-libs: Package libxxf86vm1 missing in ia32-libs thanks libXxf86vm.so.1 is from libxxf86vm1. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: severity of 357105 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > # you have to use the package to be vulnerable > severity 357105 grave Bug#357105: flashplayer-mozilla: New upstream release fixes CVE-2006-0024 Warning: Unknown package 'flashplayer

Processed: Retitling bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 356682 whishlist Severity level `whishlist' is not known. Recognized are: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, minor, wishlist, fixed. > retitle 356682 ia32-libs: Package libxxf86vm1 missing in ia32-libs Bug#356682: ia32-libs: Missing

Bug#345588: marked as done (init.d file specifies /usr/sbin but dspam is in /usr/bin)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:19:52 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bugs fixed in experimental has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your respons

Bug#356555: writes session files insecurely to /tmp; symlink attacks and data exposure

Julien Danjou wrote: > > Hole 6: > > > > Driver::sqlite writes to /tmp/sessions.sqlt by default. I have not > > checked to see if DBI->connect opens the file with O_EXCL, but I doubt > > it, so again we have symlink attacks. > > > > Hole 7: > > > > Also we again have the situation where an attac

Bug#345588: Bug#347852 acknowledged by developer (Bugs fixed in experimental)

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > Bug is fixed in experimental and the package is now in unstable, so > close these bugs. > > Regards, > > Matthijs Mohlmann thank you :). > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG w

Bug#354146: x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:27:00PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > > dpkg: error processing > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb (--unpack): > > > trying to overwrite `/etc/X11/Xsession', which is also in p

Bug#356975: FTBFS: Can't locate PDL/Config.pm

* Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-15 15:28]: > strange, as it got build on the mips autobuilder (mayr) on the 9th of > january without problems, at least according to But that was in January. Now it fails, and not only on mips but on i386 too. > Which version of perl are you using?

Bug#357009: tramp: FTBFS: texi2dvi / etex error

reassign 357009 texinfo 4.8-5 quit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > building the package tramp in a clean sid build environment > (with pbuilder) on i386 results in: > /usr/bin/texi2dvi: etex exited with bad status, quitting. > /usr/bin/texi2dvi: see tramp.log for errors. This is apparently a bug in

Processed: severity of 356682 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 356682 wishlist Bug#356682: ia32-libs: Package libxxf86vm1 missing in ia32-libs Severity set to `wishlist'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Processed: reopening 356555

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15 > reopen 356555 Bug#356555: writes session files insecurely to /tmp; symlink attacks and data exposure Bug reopened, originator not changed. > End of message, stopping processing here

Processed: Re: Bug#357009: tramp: FTBFS: texi2dvi / etex error

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 357009 texinfo 4.8-5 Bug#357009: tramp: FTBFS: texi2dvi / etex error Bug reassigned from package `tramp' to `texinfo'. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (admin

Bug#354146: x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:07:33PM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:27:00PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > > > > dpkg: error processing > > > > /var/cache/apt/archives/x11-common_6.9.0.dfsg.1-4_all.deb (--unpac

Bug#356177: FTBFS: ./configure: line 2778: syntax error near unexpected token '('

tags 356177 +patch thanks -- David Watson Lugmaster, Programmer, Bass Player http://planetwatson.co.uk/blog http://liverpool.lug.org.uk IM(jabber): [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -ur fv/fv-3.0/fitsTcl/configure fv-3.0/fitsTcl/configure --- fv/fv-3.0/fitsTcl/configure 2006-03-15 21:06:36.0 +000

Processed: Merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 357087 serious Bug#357087: FTBFS: missing build dependency on bzip2 Severity set to `serious'. > tags 352726 + patch Bug#352726: FTBFS: tar: bzip2: Cannot exec: No such file or directory Tags were: pending confirmed Tags added: patch > merge

Processed: Fixed in NMU of erlang 1:10.b.7-1.1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 331817 + fixed Bug#331817: erlang depends on debconf without | debconf-2.0 alternate; blocks cdebconf transition There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > tag 344118 + fixed Bug#344118: Syntax error in erlang's Conflicts line Tags were: patch Ta

Processed: severity of 314829 is grave

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 314829 grave Bug#314829: libdevil1: Problems reading png in amd64 Severity set to `grave'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian

Bug#353687: marked as done (debian-installer-utils: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'bogl-bterm')

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:42 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#353687: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.24 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#356845: marked as done (cdebconf: Preseeded passwords are disclosed in world-readable questions.dat after installation)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:21 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#356845: fixed in cdebconf 0.98 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#357106: [Pkg-alsa-devel] Bug#357106: alsaconf modifies modules.conf unrelatedly

Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Running alsaconf, my modules.conf was modified: > > -alias net-pf-10 off# IPv6 > +# alias net-pf-10 off # IPv6 alsaconf runs update-modules after modifying /etc/modutils/sound. If you made changes to files in /etc/modutils/ without running upda

Bug#354146: x11-common: Cannot upgrade from sarge: file conflict with xfree86-common

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:41:39PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 11:07:33PM +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:27:00PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > > > Where can we find documentation about moving conffiles between packages? > > > > 'Don't.' > > > >

Bug#356988: pstotext: doesn't correctly quote characters to nested shell

On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 16:58:10 +1100, Brian May wrote: > This could be a security issue, if you can run pstotext with an arbitrary > filename (eg. via swish++ running on some untrusted source). pstotext currently popen(3)s a command containing a filename supplied by its caller. The only way to s

Processed: tagging 356398

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 356398 + moreinfo Bug#356398: kpilot: Crashes and destroys user data on synch There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Processed: tagging 321102

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 321102 + upstream Bug#321102: kmail looses mails There were no tags set. Bug#332473: kmail: dangerous handling of dimap-folders Bug#350851: kmail: v1.9.1: Data loss w/disconnected IMAP (reported upstream) Tags added: upstream > End of message, sto

Processed: Re: Bug#356988: pstotext: doesn't correctly quote characters to nested shell

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 356988 + upstream help patch Bug#356988: pstotext: doesn't correctly quote characters to nested shell There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream, help, patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian b

Bug#339223: marked as done (library package needs to be renamed (libstdc++ allocator change))

Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:32:07 -0800 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#339223: fixed in libtunepimp 0.4.2-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is no

  1   2   >