Has anyone tried the clFFT test I requested above?
Nothing further from upstream.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 861633 2.6.1-1
Bug #861633 [nut-hal-drivers] nut-hal-drivers: fails to install in chroot on
stretch host
Warning: Unknown package 'nut-hal-drivers'
There is no source info for the package 'nut-hal-drivers' at version '2.6.1-1'
with archite
Package: nut-hal-drivers
Version: 2.4.3-1.1squeeze2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: close -1 hal/2.6.1-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy
Hi,
Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 12:05:41 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > For init scripts that can be done by the following shell snippet (just
> > before starting the DM):
> >
> > """
> > if [ -x /bin/plymouth ] ; then
> >/bin/plymouth quit
> > fi
> > """
JFTR: This needs
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 23:18:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860576: fixed in wdm 1.28-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #860576,
regarding wdm: Missing dependency on an X server
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 23:18:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860464: fixed in wdm 1.28-20
has caused the Debian Bug report #860464,
regarding wdm: Missing handling of plymouth (#782456)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Hi,
Niels Thykier wrote:
> > So I wonder: Shall I upload the fix suggested by Niels anyways? (Not
> > untested, but unverified.)
>
> Laurent, can you help here?
Chatted with Laurent on IRC this weekend. He has no idea either. We
agreed that since calling "plymouth quit" shouldn't hurt, we'll go
Control: tag -1 pending
On Fri, 28 Apr 2017 at 12:25:02 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> the following vulnerability was published for roundcube.
>
> CVE-2017-8114[0]:
> security issue in virtualmin and sasl drivers
Thanks, pushed. Sandro, Vincent, would you mind tagging & uploading?
--
G
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #861388 [src:roundcube] roundcube: CVE-2017-8114: security issue in
virtualmin and sasl drivers
Added tag(s) pending.
--
861388: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861388
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857937: fixed in gsequencer 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857937,
regarding gsequencer: memory leaks while g_timeout_add() function in GUI
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857936: fixed in gsequencer 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857936,
regarding gsequencer: duplicated flag AGS_MIDI_PARSER_EOT makes header useless
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857910: fixed in gsequencer 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857910,
regarding gsequencer: GObject::dispose() is not implemented
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857935: fixed in gsequencer 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857935,
regarding gsequencer: SIGSEGV as doing NULL pointer dereference as restoring
AgsFFPlayer
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 21:03:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#857931: fixed in gsequencer 0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #857931,
regarding gsequencer: AgsSynth possible division by zero by oscillator
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #861218 [libgssapi-krb5-2] libgssapi-krb5-2: soname-independent files in
shared library package (policy 8.2)
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
861218: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861218
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
control: severity -1 normal
Will remove this file early in buster.
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2017 21:38:44 +0200
with message-id <20170501193844.GA1099@donald>
and subject line Re: Bug#860247: umockdev FTBFS on arm64/mips*/s390x:
test-umockdev.c:1939:t_testbed_proc: assertion failed:
(g_str_has_prefix(contents, "processor"))
has caused the Debian Bug report
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:dask 0.12.0-1
Bug #861567 [src:sphinx] sphinx: 1.5.3+ breaks src:dask build
Bug reassigned from package 'src:sphinx' to 'src:dask'.
No longer marked as found in versions sphinx/1.5.5-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #861567 to the sa
Control: reassign -1 src:dask 0.12.0-1
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 +patch
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 07:31:26PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello, I'm not sure if this is a problem in sphinx or not,
> I noticed this failure on src:dask in Ubuntu, and it is
> reprodu
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:04:12PM +0300, Bogdan Ilisei wrote:
> Package: openvswitch-datapath-dkms
> Version: 1.4.2+git20120612-9.1~deb7u1.1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Installing openvswitch-datapath-dkms (OR openvswitch-datapath-source)
Am 01.05.2017 um 17:06 schrieb Roger Shimizu:
On Mon, 1 May 2017 16:07:07 +0200
"Dr. Tobias Quathamer" wrote:
This is not correct. Unblocks are never triggered automatically. You
always need to file an unblock request.
See this mail for more details:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-anno
On Mon, 1 May 2017 16:07:07 +0200
"Dr. Tobias Quathamer" wrote:
> This is not correct. Unblocks are never triggered automatically. You
> always need to file an unblock request.
>
> See this mail for more details:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2017/02/msg1.html
I read tho
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:38:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Since pixbros and pixfrogger are the only 2 packages in Debian with
> this problem,[1] what about simply making them binary-any with an
> architecture list of all 32bit architectures?
CC'd to the CC-list from the thread about which ar
Hi,
the update indeed fixes the issue. Thanks!
Cheers,
Stefan
On 04/30/2017 01:36 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the src:linux package:
>
> #861313: kernel BUG with kvm
>
> It has been closed by Ben
Source: rzip
Version: 2.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
Hi,
the following vulnerability was published for rzip, filled with RC
severity due to the heap overflow write, but no further investigation
done so far.
CVE-2017-8364[0]:
| The read_buf functio
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 861539 confirmed upstream
Bug #861539 [src:tcpreplay] tcpreplay FTBFS on armel/armhf/mips*: L7 fuzzing
test: Makefile:963: recipe for target 'rewrite_l7fuzzing' failed
Added tag(s) upstream and confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Am 01.05.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Roger Shimizu:
Thanks for your help to upload!
I find if RC bug is closed by the upload, unblock will be triggered
automatically (or release team is monitoring on these, so they will
unblock when see it).
This is not correct. Unblocks are never triggered automati
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:29:30 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 01:00:20PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > FYI, that's the number of additional copies of source packages in
> > stretch, per source package:
> >
> > udd=> select source, count(*) from sources where release='s
Package: pixbros
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
Hi all,
Pix Bros describes itself "as inspired" by Bubble Bobble, Snow Bros and
Tumblepop.
In the source package, there are screenshots of what I believe are Snow Bros'
levels 21-50 in the "recursos/floors" folder.
The levels for the
On Mon, 1 May 2017 11:48:45 +0200
"Dr. Tobias Quathamer" wrote:
> I've just uploaded your fix to unstable, thanks for your work! Are you
> going to file an unblock request bug report?
Thanks for your help to upload!
I find if RC bug is closed by the upload, unblock will be triggered
automatica
Your message dated Mon, 1 May 2017 14:40:55 +0200
with message-id <20170501124055.65cny7w4hbzuo...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#861605: pixfrogger: FTBFS on amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #861605,
regarding pixfrogger: FTBFS on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that
Hi Julien
On 29 April 2017 at 17:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=julia&arch=mips64el&ver=0.4.7-6%2Bb3&stamp=1493472677&raw=0
I've been unable to reproduce the build failure above. I see it was
subsequently given back and built successfully:
https://bu
Control: severity -1 normal
On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 13:12:32 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64
> severity 534058 serious
> thanks
>
> Packages must autobuild in our autobuilders. Because our Arch:all
> autobuilder is amd64, this is RC.
>
No, it very much isn't.
Cheers
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #534058 [pixbros] FTBFS on amd64
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
534058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=534058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: src:pixfrogger
Severity: serious
Same problem as #534058: Build-depends are not available on amd64.
Because our Arch:all autobuilder is amd64, this is RC for stretch.
Thanks.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 534058 FTBFS on amd64
Bug #534058 [pixbros] build-depends not available on amd64
Changed Bug title to 'FTBFS on amd64' from 'build-depends not available on
amd64'.
> severity 534058 serious
Bug #534058 [pixbros] FTBFS on amd64
Severity se
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:50:46 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 07:21:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> > @Andreas: Assuming worst case, what are the options for dropping beignet
> > support in your packages? (I appreciate that they are probably not the
> >
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 06:53:32PM +0200, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> I have a bugfix release for sane-backend ready and I send it to you.
>
> Please can you test the packages?
I did tests on different DEs (KDE, MATE, GNOME, Xfce) after installing
the new packages in each case.
Both 'scanimage -
Your message dated Mon, 01 May 2017 10:03:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#860710: fixed in golang-google-api
0.0~git20161128.3cc2e59-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #860710,
regarding golang-google-api: FTBFS on i386: dh_auto_test: go test -v -p 64
[...] returned exit code 2
to
Am 27.04.2017 um 17:15 schrieb Roger Shimizu:
Control: tag -1 +patch
I pushed a fix commit to stretch branch in git repo.
Confirmed that FTBFS fixed on DoM:
http://debomatic-i386.debian.net/distribution#unstable/golang-google-api/0.0~git20161128.3cc2e59-2/buildlog
Package also uploaded to me
Weechat version 1.5-1~bpo8+10 in jessie-backports is still vulnerable
to CVE-2017-8073.
The same for 1.0.1-1~bpo70+1 in weezy-backports.
Hi
> HOME=/home/lamby
> LOGNAME=lamby
> SHLVL=1
> PWD=/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20170430222311.WuN76MAfhh.db.libgnupg-interface-perl/libgnupg-interface-perl-0.52
> OLDPWD=/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20170430222311.WuN76MAfhh.db.libgnupg-interface-perl
I think that's only indirectly a problem by libgnupg-inte
Package: postfix-cdb
Version: 3.1.4-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Unlike the other postfix map packages, postfix-cdb doesn't have a breaks on
earlier versions of postfix, so addmap can fire with the jessie version still
in place resulting in a non-functioning package.
Source: node-dateformat
Version: 1.0.11-2
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
node-dateformat fails to build from source in unstable/a
Source: libgnupg-interface-perl
Version: 0.52-5
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
libgnupg-interface-perl fails to build from source
45 matches
Mail list logo