On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:50:58PM -0700, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be
> included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages.
I hope you pulled the patch from the git archive.
Bastian
--
"We have the right to survive!"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 328534 pending
Bug#328534: Kernel panic on Adaptec 2100S on boot
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
tags 328534 pending
thanks
Hi,
I have committed the patch for this problem to svn. The fix will be
included into the 2.6.12-7 upload of kernel packages.
Best regards,
Jurij Smakov[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ Key
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328738 important
Bug#328738: kaffeine: Kaffeine not loading Kaffeine Part
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.7.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #328738
The problem seems to stem from kaffeine-xine not having been installed
during the upgrade of kaffeine. Once I installed kaffeine-xine, kaffeine
is running fine.
Dependencies for kaffeine show:
kaffeine-gstreamer | kaffeine-xin
Package: kaffeine
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I just upgraded kaffeine from 0.6.1 to 0.7.1-1. Upon running it, the
Kaffeine 0.7.1 Installation Wizard pops up with an installation check.
The installation check says: "Kaffeine Part... Part not found. Ple
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:03:30 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328733: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency on
r-cran-gmodels
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:32:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327039: fixed in kdebase 4:3.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gregmisc
Version: 2.0.8-1
Severity: serious
gregmisc fails to build because it cannot satisfy its build-dependency
on r-cran-gmodels:
> -> Considering r-cran-gmodels
>-> Trying r-cran-gmodels
>-> Cannot install r-cran-gmodels; apt errors follow:
> Reading package lists...
>
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:35:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is not really abug in the package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327982: fixed in konserve 0.10.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:17:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321608: fixed in safecat 1.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Sven,
> why are you running a totally outdated twiki package?
Because I am an idiot, with a badly mis-configured APT!
(That I inherited this machine recently is no excuse.)
Thanks for putting me on the right path: now all fixed.
Sorry about the wasted bandwidth. Please close this bug.
Cheers,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package octave-forge
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: octave-forge
> tags 302034 upstream
Bug#302034: octave-forge: command 'legend' fails on first call and works
afterward
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> tags 295395 fixed-upstream
Bug#2
Sorry to the both of you, sincerely. I really did not mean for my email
to sound like a rant, or pointing fingers. I was merely excited to
pinpoint the problem that many of my friends have been ranting to _me_
about, and my misplaced enthusiasm, coupled with the fact that it was
4am (when I'm mos
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:40:01AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On 2005-09-15 Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 07:58:57AM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > > Please rebuild libdbi-perl_1.48-2 as it failed due to a problem on the
> > > host q650. Thanks!
> > I don't understa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328656 ftp.debian.org
Bug#328656: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `umsdos' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
xmms when opened as an application, immediately crashes and ceases to function.
Clicking the "play" applet in xmms, causes xmms to freeze to the desktop after
which xkill must be invoked to delete
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328695 sylpheed-claws
Bug#328695: sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin is uninstallable in Sid
Bug reassigned from package `sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin' to `sylpheed-claws'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
reassign 328695 sylpheed-claws
thanks
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 10:03:47PM +0200, Horacio wrote:
> sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin is uninstallable in Debian/Sid. It gives
> the following error when trying to install it:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> sylpheed-claws-maildir-plu
Hi Matt!
Thanks for your bugreport. I'll look into this, as soon as I come back home
from England (end of September) and after I have cought up with all my other
work (probably middle of October).
It this takes too long and if you want to fix it yourself, please go ahead and
feel free to make
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> retitle 327835 python2.3-dev: distutils should not produce -O3 optimizations
> (required by policy)
Bug#327835: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Changed Bug title.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> tags 327835 - wontfix
Bug#327835: soya_0.10.1-1(m68k/unstable/poseidon): FTBFS on m68k
Tags were: wontfix sid
Tags removed: wontfix
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
El Viernes, 16 de Septiembre de 2005 14:01, escribió:
> > http://darkshines.net/debian/dists/unstable/konserve/
>
> The patch 01_admin_update.diff doesn't appear to apply cleanly to the
> sources. Are you aware of this?
No, I don't know how I missed this. I built the package two times (one with
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328198: fixed in plplot 5.3.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:17:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#274359: fixed in plplot 5.3.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:02:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328036: fixed in tripwire 2.3.1.2.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:02:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323329: fixed in gkrellm-snmp 0.21-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 307824 + fixed
Bug#307824: anon-proxy: Move /etc/init.d/anon-proxy vars to
/etc/default/anon-proxy
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> tag 309495 + fixed
Bug#309495: anon-proxy: fails to clean /etc/environment on uninstall, debconf
change
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 328172 + fixed
Bug#328172: libdevice-serialport-perl: ftbfs [sparc] mknod: `debian/ttyS47':
Operation not permitted
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Package: kernel-source-2.4.27
Version: 2.4.27-11
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The kernel fails to compile with the following error:
/usr/bin/make CFLAGS="-D__KERNEL__
-I/home/marlow/src/kernel/kernel-source-2.4.27/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fn
Hi,
here come the CAN numbers:
CAN-2005-2920 for libclamav/upx.c overflow,
CAN-2005-2919 for the fsg.c infinite loop.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin
Severity: grave
sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin is uninstallable in Debian/Sid. It gives
the following error when trying to install it:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
sylpheed-claws-maildir-plugin: Depends: sylpheed-claws (>= 1.0.4) but
it
Package: gallery2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
>From the last package from sid, I get:
Version: 2.0-1
Depends: apache | apache-ssl | apache-perl | apache2, php4 | php4-cgi |
libapache2-mod-php4 | php5 | php5-cgi | libapache2-mod-php5, netpbm (>=
9.20), debconf (>= 0.2.2
Max Vozeler wrote:
> Hi security team,
>
> the loop-aes-utils package in sarge is affected by CAN-2005-2876
> (#328626). I've prepared a stable-security upload of 2.12p-4sarge1
> with a fix backported from 2.12r-pre1:
>
> http://people.debian.org/~xam/security/loop-aes-utils/
>
> This bug will
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Experimental is pinned at 1 ynway so unless you installed
>with -t experimental you won't get the updates automatically.
>
Thanks a lot for the very quick reaction.
I have now upgraded to the new experimental version of openoffice.org2
(and am happily t
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:20:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 3.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 02:59:15AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Looks like this only happens on amd64:
I'm guessing this is going to happen on all 64 bit arches once
they get build.
The problem seems to be that the gettext macro is buggy and fails
to detect gettext in libc on 64 bit arches. I
OK.. I feel silly now. I guess I looked at FORCE_FROM first and somehow
didn't read through all the config options (I looked at the manpage I
promise :) I guess it could have failed more clearly (maybe "hey this
isn't an email address" - although IIRC validating an RFC 822 address is
a huge re
I do not understand what you are complaining about.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: udev
Version: 0.056-3
Followup-For: Bug #317332
-- Package-specific info:
-- /etc/udev/rules.d/:
/etc/udev/rules.d/:
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 2005-04-20 23:12 020_permissions.rules ->
../permissions.rules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 2005-08-04 23:37 050_hal-plugdev.rules ->
.
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 09:40:21AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: scim-tables
> Version: 0.4.3-2
> Severity: serious
>
> scim-tables fails to build because configure cannot find
> scim-make-table:
>
> > checking for scim-make-table... no
> > configure: error: Could not find a scim-make-table
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 328644 normal
Bug#328644: gringotts: fails to start: Increase the memory locking limit to at
least 5120 bytes
Severity set to `normal'.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328593 normal
Bug#328593: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 328593 RM: npadmin -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
Bug#328593: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328653 normal
Bug#328653: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 328653 RM: tclexpat -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
Bug#328653: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> reassig
severity 328653 normal
retitle 328653 RM: tclexpat -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
reassign 328653 ftp.debian.org
thankskbye
"David N. Welton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose
>> to remove it.
>>
severity 328593 normal
retitle 328593 RM: npadmin -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
reassign 328593 ftp.debian.org
thankskbye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Torsten Landschoff) writes:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 327497 [ppc] Generic fbdev driver causes color swap
Bug#327497: Generic fbdev driver causes color swap on PPC
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328672 normal
Bug#328672: xnest: can't type control characters in Xnest clients
Severity set to `normal'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 328602 wnpp
Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `redir' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 328602 RFA: redir needs new maintainer
Bug#328602: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> sever
* Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-16T18:30+0200]:
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could cover up some QA problems.
>
> I've done this now and your package sh
reassign 328602 wnpp
retitle 328602 RFA: redir needs new maintainer
severity 328602 normal
thanks
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:32:32PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> After 7 days without answer from you (the maintainer) we will reassign
> this bug to either WNPP (in case we propose to orphan
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:02:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328668: openoffice.org2: Can't upgrade from 1.9.121-2 to
1.9.125
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: slsc
Version: 0.2.3-8
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 316566 64 bit issues with XChangeProperty -- fixed in 0.9.14
Bug#316566: Can't start XUL apps like firefox/thunderbird with fluxbox
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I propose
> to remove it.
> It has almost no users, there are other ways to parse XML in Tcl and the
> package is very out of date wrt Debian's policies.
Right - go ahead.
--
David N. Welton
- http://www.
Package: kimwitu
Version: 4.6.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Package: xnest
Version: 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I do:
$ Xnest :1 &
$ xterm -display :1 &
Then, in the xterm window within the Xnest window, when I try to use
control characters like ^U, only lowercase 'u' is received and echoed.
-- System Inform
Package: bnlib
Version: 1.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 325960 + fixed
Bug#325960: depends on a FLAC library no longer available in unstable
Tags were: sid
Tags added: fixed
> tag 326935 + fixed
Bug#326935: libxine1 has an unstated dependency on libgnomevfs2-0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
title 316566 64 bit issues with XChangeProperty -- fixed in 0.9.14
thanks
This appears to be #1107213 upstream.
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1107213&group_id=35398&atid=413960)
It has been fixed in version 0.9.13 (and 0.9.14 is available now).
--Ken Bloom
--
I usua
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 12:01:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could cover up some QA problems.
Yep, thanks for caring abou
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> * configure/configure.in: Update version requirements for gtkmm, gdkmm,
> glibmm, pangomm
>
> * tools/extra_defs_gen/Makefile.{am,in}: change library name from
> '-lgtkmm_generate_extra_defs-2.0' to '-lglibmm_generate_ext
Package: openoffice.org2
Version: 1.9.121-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
It seems to be impossible to upgrade openoffice.org2 from 1.9.121-2 to
1.9.125+2.0beta2-1
Both Synaptic and apt-get install tell me that 1.9.121 is the newest version. I
also noticed that openoff
Package: rx320
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I pro
Package: ctklight
Version: 0.22.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: libdebconf-ruby
Version: 0.0.5
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the l
Hi,
just a note before someone gets trigger happy about this bug and does
something idiotic.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:05:42PM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote:
> When building 'mesa' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
> I get the following error:
>
> touch depend
> makedepend -fdepend -I. -I../
Package: clamav
Version: 0.84-2.sarge.2
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
the new version 0.87 of clamav fixes vulnerabilities in handling of UPX
and FSG compressed executables.
>From upstreams Changelog:
* Changes backported from CVS:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328536 RM: slpim -- RoM and RoQA; outdated, no users
Bug#328536: very old package with RC bugs, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328536 normal
Bug#328536: RM: slpim -- RoM and RoQA; outdated, no users
Severity set to `norma
On 9/16/05, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: zorroutils
> Version: 0.03-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
> decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
> long time could cover
retitle 328536 RM: slpim -- RoM and RoQA; outdated, no users
severity 328536 normal
reassign 328536 ftp.debian.org
thankskbye
Vikram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> slpim is quite a dead package, and I have lost interest in it myself.
> I don't really think it has any users at all, and so it mi
Package: umsdos
Version: 1.13-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list. I
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:31:49 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321832: libpango in experimental broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:42:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326559: Fixed?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:42:59 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324585: wmaker: FTBFS [gcc-4.0/i386]: Can't find a register
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
here is my proposed patch to allow, at configure, time the production of
shared library with versioned symbols. i used it to build curl 7.14.1-1
debian package now in experimental.
Thanks!
I like the general spirit, but I have a few remarks:
1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Sebastian,
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:08:14PM +0200, Sebastian Fontius wrote:
> ,
> | (process:11198): gringotts-CRITICAL **: Increase the memory locking
> | limit to at least 5120 bytes. Current limit: 32768 bytes.
> `
This is a safety
Package: tclexpat
Version: 1.1-2.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
Package: zorroutils
Version: 0.03-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
During the Debian QA meeting hold during Sept. 09th till 11th, we
decided that looking at packages that haven't been uploaded for a very
long time could cover up some QA problems.
I've done this now and your package showed up on the list.
This should be fixed in libgl1-mesa-dri 6.3.2-2, please confirm.
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer
Libre software enthusiast| http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 328597 normal
Bug#328597: very old package, should this be removed?
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 328597 RM: oaklisp -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
Bug#328597: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> reassign
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#325557: fixed in pdsh 1.7-6-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 328584 RM: termcap-compat -- RoQA; old, obsolete, unneeded
Bug#328584: very old package, should this be removed?
Changed Bug title.
> severity 328584 normal
Bug#328584: RM: termcap-compat -- RoQA; old, obsolete, unneeded
Severity set to `normal
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.7
> severity 317970 serious
Bug#317970: amd64-libs: CAN-2005-2096: old version of zlib
Severity set to `serious'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
severity 328597 normal
retitle 328597 RM: oaklisp -- RoM and RoQA; very old, obsolete
reassign 328597 ftp.debian.org
thankskbye
Barak Pearlmutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes; I think it would be okay to remove oaklisp at this point.
> (If I ever get around to making the upstream changes it n
retitle 328584 RM: termcap-compat -- RoQA; old, obsolete, unneeded
severity 328584 normal
reassign 328584 ftp.debian.org
merge 328584 323139
thankskbye
Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:15:05AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> During the Debian QA meeting
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for your note.
>
> In response to :
[...]
Please note that the bug submission mail was a template, so the list was
quite general. In all cases, 1 and (2 or 3 or 4 or 5) was true (as
stated below the list)
> 4) This is the only EAN13 barcode pack
Package: gringotts
Version: 1.2.8+1.2.9pre1-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
hi,
I don't know if it's just me, my kernel or the new gnome (but I doubt
the latter) but gringotts in testing fails to start. once again :-/.
I start it like this:
,
| $ gringotts
`
o
Thanks for your note.
In response to :
1) Yep I need to do a upload to clear some minor bugs. This will be done.
2) Not true. The only serious bug is this one.
3) Not true. I am very much alive.
4) This is the only EAN13 barcode package in debian.
5) Not true. ean13 was released with sarg
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:17:40 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328626: fixed in loop-aes-utils 2.12p-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:19:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#328199: pytables: rebuild required for hdf5 migration
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:21:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326715: pytables: FTBFS: Build-Depends cannot be satisfied
because the package python2.2-numarray cannot be found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:17:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258635: fixed in eazel-engine 0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:17:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#240149: fixed in eazel-engine 0.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
On Friday 16 September 2005 14:41, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2005, Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=321832
>
> Does it still crash with libpango1.0 1.10?
No, it doesn't.
Kind regards,
Wilfred de Bo
Hi Marc,
slpim is quite a dead package, and I have lost interest in it myself.
I don't really think it has any users at all, and so it might be a
good idea to drop it now. I should have been a little more careful in
dealing with it, and should have dropped it myself a few years ago.
Vikram
Steve Langasek has kindly accepted to upload the PyTables 1.1.1
package compiled against HDF5 1.6.4.
This should be enough to close this bug.
--
>0,0< Francesc Altet http://www.carabos.com/
V V Cárabos Coop. V. Enjoy Data
"-"
Hi security team,
the loop-aes-utils package in sarge is affected by CAN-2005-2876
(#328626). I've prepared a stable-security upload of 2.12p-4sarge1
with a fix backported from 2.12r-pre1:
http://people.debian.org/~xam/security/loop-aes-utils/
This bug will be fixed in unstable with 2.12p-9 (p
Your message dated Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:36:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line OpenSSH client causes segmentation fault
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:20:09PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: pari
> Severity: serious
> Version: 2.1.6-3
>
> >From my build log (in an i386 chroot):
>
> ...
> make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/pari-2.1.6/obj'
> * Testing objets for gp-dyn..BUG [0]
> * Testing analyz
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
