tags 299549 pending
thanks
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was told on a non-Debian mailing list that upgrade from woody to sarge
> fails because of conflicts between login/sarge and manpages-it/woody.
> This is similar to #284239.
Thanks for investigating this completely, Denis. A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 299549 pending
Bug#299549: login: upgrade from woody fails due to conflicting files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Followup-For: Bug #299572
strace -ff output
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11ac3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=
Package: nautilus
Version: 2.8.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After my last update nautilus crashes on Gnome startup.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7
L
This one time, at band camp, Steve Langasek said:
> > Mostly sarge based system with a few unstable packages.
>
> > $ python
> > Python 2.3.5 (#2, Feb 9 2005, 00:38:15)
> > >>> import pycurl
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "", line 1, in ?
> > ImportError: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.
reassign 299525 libcurl3
thanks
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:44:09PM -0500, John Eikenberry wrote:
> Package: python2.3-pycurl
> Version: 7.13.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> Mostly sarge based system with a few unstable packages.
> $ python
> Python 2.3.5 (#2, Fe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 299525 libcurl3
Bug#299525: ImportError: undefined symbol
Bug reassigned from package `python2.3-pycurl' to `libcurl3'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
On Mar 12, Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mar 12, Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:39:44AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > docbook2pdf local-fontconfig-user.sgml
> > > Using catalogs: /etc/sgml/catalog
> > > Using stylesheet: /usr/sh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.10
> tags 299471 sid
Bug#299471: FTBFS: config.sub not executable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
=?GB2312?B?SylvIINDg0aBW4NDISE=?=
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="EUC"
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:56:47 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.
`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`E`
±ñ
Package: ntp-server
Version: 1:4.2.0a+stable-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing a dist-upgrade today, ntpd refuses to start. I have run
ntpdate to ensure that the system clock is reasonably close to correct.
I get the following in the system long, then ntpd exit
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:36:08AM +0100, txemi wrote:
> Package: dsniff
> Version: 2.4b1-8
I spoke too soon.
libnids 1.20 has made it into testing. dsniff version 2.4b1-9 has
not.
This is not something I can fix, when the most recent version of
dsniff makes it into testing your problem
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:36:08AM +0100, txemi wrote:
> Package: dsniff
> Version: 2.4b1-8
> Severity: grave
>
> dsniff fails this way in debian testing after last upgrade:
Strange it works for me.
> $ sudo dsniff
> dsniff: error while loading shared libraries: libnids.so.1.19: cannot
> open
Package: dsniff
Version: 2.4b1-8
Severity: grave
dsniff fails this way in debian testing after last upgrade:
$ sudo dsniff
dsniff: error while loading shared libraries: libnids.so.1.19: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
Perhaps this bug should be forwarded to libnids.
-
hi francesco,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 07:57:37PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> Upgrading from 4.0.23-7 hangs up (apparently after stopping and trying
> starting, pinging the server does not return with pending processes
> running). This is true on two different boxes.
> This causes serio
Adding a little piece of information:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:21:33PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> Error when lincvs start:
>
> lincvs: Symbol `FamErrlist' has different size in shared object,
> consider re-linking
Ok, the error message is definetly gamin specific, but I can't reproduce
th
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 03:21:33PM +0100, Mathieu Laurent wrote:
> Error when lincvs start:
>
> lincvs: Symbol `FamErrlist' has different size in shared object,
> consider re-linking
>
> lincvs use 98% of cpu usage
[...]
> Versions of packages lincvs depends on:
> ii cvs 1:1.12
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:17:06 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296266: fixed in greylistd 0.8.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:08:39PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
> On second thought, I'm not sure where you are seeing the reported
> error (in a logfile?).
>
> It might help to use the following lines in /etc/init.d/iptables:
It should be $@, not @$:
mkfifo /tmp/fifo;
tee -a /tmp/iptables.out 0>/tmp/fi
On second thought, I'm not sure where you are seeing the reported
error (in a logfile?).
It might help to use the following lines in /etc/init.d/iptables:
mkfifo /tmp/fifo;
tee -a /tmp/iptables.out 0>/tmp/fifo;
exec 1>>/tmp/fifo 2>&1
And if someone knows a better way of doing this, I'm all
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:47:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278502: fixed in lilypond 2.2.6-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
reopen 297481
thanks
The bug still exists and you should not close it unless the
debian-kernel team will say that they are not going to fix it.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 297481
Bug#297481: hotplug: Fails to load firmware for ipw2200 after upgrade
Bug#297686: udev 0.054-1 fails to load firmware
Bug#298397: udevsend breaks firmware downloading
Bug#298908: udev 0.054-1 and above break ipw2200 module
Bug#298950: /sbi
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:17:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299338: fixed in policycoreutils 1.22+0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#168649: fixed in ngrep 1.43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: login
Version: 1:4.0.3-30.10
Severity: serious
Hi Christian,
I was told on a non-Debian mailing list that upgrade from woody to sarge
fails because of conflicts between login/sarge and manpages-it/woody.
This is similar to #284239.
I wrote a script to check all conflicting files, here i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:47:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#135337: fixed in ngrep 1.43-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 16:32:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299063: fixed in lsof 4.74.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 15:47:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298804: fixed in conglomerate 0.9.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
diff -urN /tmp/orig/sablevm-classlib-1.1.9/debian/changelog
/tmp/dfsg/sablevm-classlib-1.1.9.dfsg1/debian/changelog
--- /tmp/orig/sablevm-classlib-1.1.9/debian/changelog 2005-03-14
14:44:58.219271552 -0600
+++ /tmp/dfsg/sablevm-classlib-1.1.9.dfsg1/debian/changelog 2005-03-14
14:53:18.50321683
That was entirely my fault, I shouldn't have uploaded this version to
unstable, as atk 1.9.x is still in experimental.
Is there any chance, Akira, that atk 1.9.x or its successor will be uploaded
to unstable very soon, or should I go ahead and force a downgrade of
libgtkmm?
-brad
> -Original
Dnia poniedziałek, 14 marca 2005 13:48, Stefan Voelkel napisał:
> Hello,
>
> I now have a seconde report of that problem, although with another window
> manager: wmi.
>
> I am getting the feeling that the problem is Gnome-WM / Non-Gnome-WM
> related.
>
> Could you run a Gnome WM (for example metaci
Dnia poniedziałek, 14 marca 2005 13:48, Stefan Voelkel napisał:
> Hello,
>
> I now have a seconde report of that problem, although with another window
> manager: wmi.
>
> I am getting the feeling that the problem is Gnome-WM / Non-Gnome-WM
> related.
>
> Could you run a Gnome WM (for example metaci
http://www.whatshould.com/
your pre-approval is waiting
I ran
> firefox --debugger gdb -P default
GNU gdb 6.3-debian
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the cond
Package: mysql-server
Version: 4.0.24-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Upgrading from 4.0.23-7 hangs up (apparently after stopping and trying
starting, pinging the server does not return with pending processes
running). This is true on two different boxes.
This causes ser
Package: grub
Version: 0.95+cvs20040624-15
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27+acl+ctx
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:29:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:03:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298132: fixed in libgnujaxp-java 1.3-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 297585 woody
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 297585 woody
Bug#297585: openafs-modules-source: fails to build with bison grammar error
Tags were: woody patch
Tags added: woody
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Package: python2.3-pycurl
Version: 7.13.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Mostly sarge based system with a few unstable packages.
$ python
Python 2.3.5 (#2, Feb 9 2005, 00:38:15)
>>> import pycurl
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in ?
ImportError
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 12:02:03 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299123: fixed in haskell-hsql 1.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:47:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#294717: fixed in gpsbabel 1.2.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:47:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#289923: fixed in vlc 0.8.1.svn20050314-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:47:34 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298067: fixed in vlc 0.8.1.svn20050314-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 299152 upstream
Bug#299152: backuppc: Loses backup history on full disk
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 299445 important
Bug#299445: logcheck: invalid regulart expression
Severity set to `important'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:02:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#297481: fixed in hotplug 0.0.20040329-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # A segfault on one less common architecture is not a grave bug.
> severity 298149 important
Bug#298149: always segfaults
Severity set to `important'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
severity 299445 important
thanks
downgrading as the error is easily caused
by faulty usage.
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Slaanesh wrote:
>
> > Command /usr/sbin/logcheck dies with following error message:
> > grep: invalid regular expression
>
it's very
Jean-Jacques,
pray send a copy of your answer to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as I do. I
am not the maintainer of the package, just an interested and somewhat
experienced bystander, and the mails should really get delivered to the
maintainer, and be archived in the BTS.
Apropos experienced, I must admit
Hi Daniel, bug, *!
I built junit today with the new gjdoc (0.7.2-2) and it worked without
modification.
I think this bug can be closed.
Regards, David
--
- hallo... wie gehts heute?
- *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
- gott sei dank kommunizieren wir über ein septisches medium ;)
-- Matthias Leeb,
Package: lincvs
Version: 1.4.0-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Error when lincvs start:
lincvs: Symbol `FamErrlist' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
lincvs use 98% of cpu usage
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT
Le lundi 14 mars 2005 à 08:55 -0500, Mark Lord a écrit :
>
> Original Message
> Subject: symlinks utility: license policy
> Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:54:57 -0500
> From: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Real-Time Remedies Inc.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> My
Package: valgrind-callgrind
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Something in the API to valgrind has changed, causing callgrind to fail:
brs% valgrind --tool=callgrind ls
Can't open tool "callgrind": /usr/lib/valgrind/vgskin_callgrind.so: undefined
symbol: v
Hi,
My "symlinks" utility pre-dates the "open source licensing" fad
by a number of years. Just to clarify, this is 100% freeware,
written entirely by myself. The intent is to use it to detect
missing/obsolete symlink targets on an installed distro, before
creating the "gold" (or "final") release
I'm with Guido Guenther on this one. Can we remove the the conflict on
sablevm, please? I'm still not even sure what the problem is, but I'm
having trouble coming up with something that would prevent these two
distinct packages from existing on the same system (particularly since
they seem to be
Hey Daf,
Is your fixed gsfonts package integrated into Ubuntu? I've been using
it happily for a while already, so I'd like to have that in Hoary as
well.
Cheers,
Danilo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:32:38 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295626: fixed in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:27:21PM +0100, Vlad Lazar wrote:
> Package: Mozilla-firefox
> Version: 1.0.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Whenever I try to write anything in the address bar or google search bar
> the Firefox chases (I uninstalled all extensions and
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 08:02:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298924: fixed in gwc 0.20.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hello,
I now have a seconde report of that problem, although with another window
manager: wmi.
I am getting the feeling that the problem is Gnome-WM / Non-Gnome-WM
related.
Could you run a Gnome WM (for example metacity) in an Xnest Window and test
revelation there?
regards
Stefan
--
Stefan
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:49:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
tags 299445 moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Slaanesh wrote:
> Package: logcheck
> Version: 1.2.35
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
not shure about this, as it works for lots others,
but let's wait if you can back it up.
> Command /usr/sbin/logcheck dies with fol
Package: Mozilla-firefox
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Whenever I try to write anything in the address bar or google search bar
the Firefox chases (I uninstalled all extensions and wiped out all
configuration files)
-- System Information:
Debian Release
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 299445 moreinfo
Bug#299445: logcheck: invalid regulart expression
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: apt-build
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
apt-build segfaults when using make_options
This appears to be due to a typo in config.c (line 141)
if(args.make_options &&
strlen(args.options) &&
(str = strtok(args.options, " ")))
{
The code appears to check the validity of the w
Package: grip
Version: 3.2.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
There was an error trying to build your package from source. From the
build log:
Automatic build of grip_3.2.0-4 on kiivi by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5
Build started at 20050313-2154
***
Package: amule
Version: 1.2.6+rc8-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Amule fires up normally, when I connect it does its job cycling servers,
but when it finds a usable server, it segfaults when the connection is
done.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefer
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 11:48:10AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Hakan Ardo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > My system is unstable as of today.
> > > Is there a missing "build-depends: netpbm" or something?
> >
> > Proba
Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 04:02:07 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298965: fixed in afterstep 2.00.03dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: svn-workbench
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
svn-workbench 1.0.0-1 suffers FTBFS in pbuilder:
/usr/bin/make -C WorkBench/Source -f linux.mak wb_version.py \
PYTHON=python \
PYCHECKER_DIR=/tmp/buildd/svn-workbench-1.0.0 \
MEINC_INSTALLER_DIR=/tmp/buildd/svn-wo
Hello,
> Is there any news on this bug [0]? Its not clear from the bug log
> that its even present in a version distributed by Debian.
Sorry, no email informing me about additional information for this bug
was send to me, else I would have responded. Your mail was the first one
informing me about
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:39:41PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> My system is unstable as of today.
> Is there a missing "build-depends: netpbm" or something?
Probably, I'll look into it...
--
Hakan Ardo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Ahh.., and btw. there are two Ben's involved in the communication about
this bug (Ben Burton and Benjamin Mesing (me)) - so be carefull not to
confuse us :-)
Greetings Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
81 matches
Mail list logo
