Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:17:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299338: fixed in policycoreutils 1.22+0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 18:19:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 13 10:19:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl-082-083-111-211.arcor-ip.net (skeeve.earth.sol) 
[82.83.111.211] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAXgv-0003h7-00; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:19:53 -0800
Received: from cts by skeeve.earth.sol with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1DAXmZ-0003gU-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:43 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: policycoreutils: FTBFS due to undeclared functions
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:25:43 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: policycoreutils
Version: 1.22-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS

Automatic build of policycoreutils_1.22-1 on aahz by sbuild/m68k 1.170.5
[...]
** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
Build-Depends: libselinux1-dev (>= 1.14-1), libpam0g-dev, libsepol1-dev, file, 
gettext
[...]
cc -O2 -g -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -W   -c -o setfiles.o setfiles.c
setfiles.c: In function `match':
setfiles.c:193: warning: implicit declaration of function `matchpathcon_index'
setfiles.c: In function `apply_spec':
setfiles.c:270: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`matchpathcon_filespec_add'
setfiles.c:313: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`is_context_customizable'
setfiles.c: In function `main':
setfiles.c:510: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`set_matchpathcon_invalidcon'
setfiles.c:513: warning: implicit declaration of function `matchpathcon_init'
setfiles.c:583: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`matchpathcon_filespec_eval'
setfiles.c:587: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`matchpathcon_filespec_destroy'
setfiles.c:591: warning: implicit declaration of function 
`matchpathcon_checkmatches'
cc -s -o setfiles setfiles.o -lselinux -lsepol
setfiles.o(.text+0x1f6): In function `match':
/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:193: undefined reference 
to `matchpathcon_index'
setfiles.o(.text+0x4d2): In function `apply_spec':
/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:332: undefined reference 
to `is_context_customizable'
setfiles.o(.text+0x5ae):/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:270:
 undefined reference to `matchpathcon_filespec_add'
setfiles.o(.text+0x9ba): In function `main':
/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:510: undefined reference 
to `set_matchpathcon_invalidcon'
setfiles.o(.text+0x9ca):/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:513:
 undefined reference to `matchpathcon_init'
setfiles.o(.text+0xa5e):/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:583:
 undefined reference to `matchpathcon_filespec_eval'
setfiles.o(.text+0xa68):/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:587:
 undefined reference to `matchpathcon_filespec_destroy'
setfiles.o(.text+0xad6):/build/buildd/policycoreutils-1.22/setfiles/setfiles.c:591:
 undefined reference to `matchpathcon_checkmatches'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [setfiles] Error 1

The package fails to build on all arches, see
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=policycoreutils&vers=1.22-1

Christian

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299338-close) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2005 22:23:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 14:23:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAxxl-0003f7-00; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:23:01 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAxry-0002A7-00; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:17:02 -0500
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299338: fixed in policycoreutils 1.22+0-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:17:02 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: policycoreutils
Source-Version: 1.22+0-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
policycoreutils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.diff.gz
policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.dsc
policycoreutils_1.22+0-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.22+0-1_i386.deb
policycoreutils_1.22+0.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/policycoreutils/policycoreutils_1.22+0.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated policycoreutils 
package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:36:24 -0600
Source: policycoreutils
Binary: policycoreutils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.22+0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 policycoreutils - SELinux core policy utilities
Closes: 299338
Changes: 
 policycoreutils (1.22+0-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * An release number designed to fix up fix the broken orig.tar.gz in the
     previous release. This is really the 1.22-2 release, but the
     1.22.orig.tar.gz in the archive is an incorrect one.
   * Bug fix: "policycoreutils: FTBFS due to undeclared functions", thanks
     to Christian T. Steigies. The build dependencies needed to  be
     versioned as well.                                 (Closes: #299338).
Files: 
 024d974df3b2ee05c822c2032b0c33f9 665 utils optional 
policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.dsc
 478ab461726e06dcce2a47cab1f79d22 53498 utils optional 
policycoreutils_1.22+0.orig.tar.gz
 b06947fa0af42c7879c5885e7712a3f3 38857 utils optional 
policycoreutils_1.22+0-1.diff.gz
 45a25a3e8e496cba1be548285a7a6337 56502 utils optional 
policycoreutils_1.22+0-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCNeovIbrau78kQkwRAo75AJ95aihItIsEDeZWT7FXFxGQkjAKiQCdEXHW
E/DjqXgxT+uM+uYaloCwYrw=
=hnvk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to