Your message dated Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:49:09 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 09:32:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 13 01:32:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at [193.170.188.104] (Debian-exim)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAPSv-0002Jc-00; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:32:53 -0800
Received: from chello062178045213.16.11.tuwien.teleweb.at ([62.178.45.213] 
helo=zion)
        by poseidon.uni-ak.ac.at with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
        id 1DAPSr-0001PR-9C
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:32:50 +0100
From: David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: EDV-Beratung&Service
Subject: Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:57:57 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed;
  boundary="Boundary-00=_WCANC0BIu7wIFyb"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-test-SpamScore: /
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

--Boundary-00=_WCANC0BIu7wIFyb
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: gjdoc
Version: 0.7.2-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable

Hi!

There is a typo in gjdoc.sh.in: The jars are installed to
/usr/share/java/, not /usr/share/java/ext/. Due to this gjdoc fails to
run reproducably.

The (trivial) patch is attached.

Regards, David

=2D- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_AT.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)


=2D------------------------------------------------------

=2D-=20
=2D hallo... wie gehts heute?
=2D *hust* gut *rotz* *keuch*
=2D gott sei dank kommunizieren wir =C3=BCber ein septisches medium ;)
 -- Matthias Leeb, Uni f. angewandte Kunst, 2005-02-15

--Boundary-00=_WCANC0BIu7wIFyb
Content-Type: text/x-diff;
  charset="utf-8";
  name="gjdoc.patch"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
        filename="gjdoc.patch"

diff -ru gjdoc-0.7.2.unpatched/gjdoc.sh.in gjdoc-0.7.2/gjdoc.sh.in
--- gjdoc-0.7.2.unpatched/gjdoc.sh.in   2005-03-12 15:08:07.000000000 +0100
+++ gjdoc-0.7.2/gjdoc.sh.in     2005-03-12 15:08:26.000000000 +0100
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]@
 
-gjdocpath=${datadir}/java/ext/com-sun-javadoc-${version}.jar:${datadir}/java/ext/com-sun-tools-doclets-Taglet-${version}.jar:${datadir}/java/ext/gnu-classpath-tools-gjdoc-${version}.jar:${ANTLR_JAR}:${CLASSPATH}
+gjdocpath=${datadir}/java/com-sun-javadoc-${version}.jar:${datadir}/java/com-sun-tools-doclets-Taglet-${version}.jar:${datadir}/java/gnu-classpath-tools-gjdoc-${version}.jar:${ANTLR_JAR}:${CLASSPATH}
 
 exec ${JAVA} -classpath ${gjdocpath} gnu.classpath.tools.gjdoc.Main ${1+"$@"}
 

--Boundary-00=_WCANC0BIu7wIFyb--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299282-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Mar 2005 12:53:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 14 04:53:00 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail2.ewetel.de [212.6.122.16] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DAp48-0008Ev-00; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 04:53:00 -0800
Received: from majestix.konqueror.de (dyndsl-080-228-195-110.ewe-ip-backbone.de 
[80.228.195.110])
        by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2ECpt8D011938;
        Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:51:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: from [192.168.1.10] (helo=papacharly.konqueror.de)
        by majestix.konqueror.de with smtp (Exim 4.44)
        id 1DAp40-00052o-T0; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:52:52 +0100
Received: by papacharly.konqueror.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 14 Mar 
2005 13:49:09 +0100
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 13:49:09 +0100
From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gjdoc.sh.in: wrong classpath
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: mutt-ng/1.5.8-r150i (Debian)
X-CheckCompat: OK
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi David,


This bug was fixed in gjdoc 0.7.2-2. Thanks for reporting it.
Please try the new version.


Michael
-- 
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to