Control: fixed -1 2.8.0-1
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (15 Jun 2013 11:10:11 GMT) :
> falconbird, please do consider using a *working* email address in
> here. Otherwise, you're adding unnecessary noise to everyone
> involved's mailbox. Thanks in advance :)
Six months later, no info came in. I still cann
intrigeri wrote (15 Jun 2013 11:02:26 GMT) :
> (Hopefully the reporter's email does not bounce this time.)
It still does:
: host mx.lavabit.com[72.249.41.52] said: 550 This
account has been locked as a result of inactivity. (in reply to RCPT TO
command)
falconbird, please do consid
Control: retitle -1 aa-status does not show loaded profiles
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 712370
Hi,
(Hopefully the reporter's email does not bounce this time.)
> I will try to answer your questions. First, rules are working and AppArmor is
> blocki
Package: apparmor
Version: 2.7.103-4
Followup-For: Bug #712050
Dear Maintainer,
I will try to answer your questions. First, rules are working and AppArmor is
blocking access to files. But when I try to run aa-status, I got this
root@debian-box:~# aa-status
AppArmor available in kernel.
AppArm
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 12:29:26PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> First, thanks for reassigning.
>
> Ben Hutchings wrote (12 Jun 2013 17:42:19 GMT) :
> > The 'wheezy' kernel has some backward compatibility code to support
> > old AppArmor userland. This code will never be part of the upst
Hi Ben,
First, thanks for reassigning.
Ben Hutchings wrote (12 Jun 2013 17:42:19 GMT) :
> The 'wheezy' kernel has some backward compatibility code to support
> old AppArmor userland. This code will never be part of the upstream
> kernel and we don't want to keep supporting it.
I'm surprised to
Hi,
falconbird wrote (12 Jun 2013 15:04:00 GMT) :
> In Linux versions after stable wheezy, AppArmor is not working, as
> it should be
Thank you for reporting this issue to Debian.
AppArmor has been continuously working fine for me on sid since Wheezy
was released, so I am surprised. On boot, my
Control: reassign -1 apparmor
Control: tag -1 jessie sid
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:04:00PM +0700, falconbird wrote:
> Package: linux
> Severity: important
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> In Linux versions after stable wheezy, AppArmor is not working, as it should
> be - rules are ok,
> but it's impos
Package: linux
Severity: important
Dear maintainer,
In Linux versions after stable wheezy, AppArmor is not working, as it should be
- rules are ok,
but it's impossible to control it - it complains that no compitablity patch is
in kernel, or it not have enough
rules. It's ok in Ubuntu, but the v
9 matches
Mail list logo
