Hi,
I opened up the error.txt in VM (after adding a From line at
top), to simulate a new mbox folder, and hit F. You can see the
results below (I do not use supercite).
So, this seems more like a problem in your setup, or possibly
with supercite, and not VM proper. I think th
> I repeat, I am not doing anything "non-standard":
>
> $ cp /boot/config-2.6.31-1-amd64 .config
> $ make-kpkg --initrd --revision=custom.1.2 kernel_image
That's [retty non-standard for a custom kernel. You are using
a distro kitchen sync config for making a custom kernel; and
kerne
Alan BRASLAU writes:
> On Thursday 19 November 2009 23:55:43 Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Ou, Nov 19 2009, Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> > > kernel-package is now severly broken! Building and installing a[nd]
> > > new kernel image now results in *two* identical vmlinuz nodes with
> > > *identical* na
Max Kellermann writes:
> On 2009/08/27 18:02, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > brk(0x3233000) = 0x3233000
> > > mmap(NULL, 18446744073703178240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> > > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = -1 ENOMEM (Cannot allocate memory)
> > > mma
Hi,
> The bad thing is just that this makes it impossible to install
> kfreebsd currently without fiddeling by hand inside the chroot.
In retrospect, that is silly, seeing that libsepol can do no
good on a non-linux machine
> No solution / proposal how to continue yet. Can we please
Michal Suchanek writes:
> 2009/8/12 Manoj Srivastava :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Well, what commands were you issuing when the build failed? I
> > can still build a kernel_image with rootcmd fakeroot, and I do not see
> > where the bug could lie, especially without a log.
>
> I changed my
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Hmm.. There was many changes between 2.6.28 and 2.6.30 so that might be
> not comparable. In fact, some doesn't work with 2.6.29 and newer on my
> test system.
I have been able to succesfully compile, based on the
currently installed kernel images:
linux-image-2.
Hi,
Arthur Marsh writes:
>
> MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-4.4";export MAKEFLAGS; CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=32;export
> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL;time make-kpkg --initrd configure linux-image
> modules-image
>
> and did produce a gcc-4.4 compiled binary.
>
> It appears that what I had overlooked was the "make-kp
Hi,
Ah. That bug was fixed in 8.0.12-1, in emacsen.remove.
manoj
--
Love means having to say you're sorry every five minutes.
Manoj Srivastava
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
Hi,
I don't think that /usr/share/doc/gettext/README.Debian is
good enough, no. Espescially since the user is not normally aware
that theya re using gettext, which they are not, directly. They just
called autoreconf, which is a pretty popular script in autoconf.
I am not sure w
Arthur Marsh writes:
> sriva...@acm.org wrote, on 2009-04-18 03:59:
>> Can you list what is in /lib/modules/2.6.27?
> False alarm. I should have mentioned that I had also built alsa-modules
> for this kernel and they hadn't been removed at that stage.
>> dpkg -S /etc/kernel/post
Arthur Marsh writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote, on 2009-04-18 02:51:
>> On Fri, Apr 17 2009, Arthur Marsh wrote:
>>> make-kpkg --initrd linux-image
>>> against the 2.6.27 kernel.org source.
>>> The built package when installed did not have an initrd and when
>>> I
>> Did you drop
Arthur Marsh writes:
> Further to my last email...
> When I used aptitude again, linux-2.6.27 was marked with a "c" and
> when I tried to remove linux-2.6.28 with aptitude I received the
> errors:
> aptitude
> (Reading database ... 99365 files and directories currently installed.)
> Remo
Hi,
This is not about this being a bug in linuz-image, or it being
fixed there, since the suer does not use linux-image or
kernel-package.
The user uses straignt kernel source code, kbuild, and make
deb from Kbuild directly. That just isntalls the kernel image. The
user then
Kai Wasserb ch writes:
> Hello Manjo,
Manoj, not Manjo
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> I do not consider the computer talking to me directly a bug. I
>> consider the style to be personable, and the stilted, distant
>> styles recommended as being very impersonal and unfriendly. I
>> b
On Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:27:48 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> reassign 498010 base-files thanks
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> policycoreutils already installs the /selinux directory. This
>> report is not about that -- since policycoreutil
Hi,
On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 07:45:34 +0200, Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Manoj,
> unfortunately, the problem persist. I can start and stop daemons
> without run_init (they run as "root:system_r" instead of
> "system_u:system_r", but I guess that is ok?), but run_init still
> fails t
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:39:38 -0400, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> The issue is that we need to convert relative links to absolute
>> ones for atom and rss feeds -- but there are two types of relative
>> links. The first kind, relative to the current document (
>>
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 15:48:43 -0400, Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Le samedi 30 juin 2007 19:09, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
>> On Sat, 19 May 2007 16:16:34 -0400, Filipus Klutiero
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted is priority standard, but it is
>> >
On Thu, 10 May 2007 06:56:55 -0400, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:20:07AM +0200, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> Why does lynx need an executable stack?
> It doesn't. The error message states that liblzo requires the
> executable stack.
Beg pardon.
Hi,
On Mon, 07 May 2007 10:48:33 +0200, Johannes Berg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 20:09 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Not enough people are kernel hackers for that mode to be the
>> default mode of operation.
> Yeah, I guess. Maybe I'll just patch my local kernel-packa
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:12:35 +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
>> The setlocalversion script goes and changes the version of the
>> kernel _after_ ./debian/ has been populated, which causes the
>> ./debian/changelog and ./debian/control files to be out of synch
>> with what the
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:13:28 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> You ztill so miss the point that it's laughable. It is about
> DOCUMENTATION as well as the principle of leastt surprise.
> Devotee fails on both. But sure, keep sending insulting emails.
> That'll help. Not.
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:10:23 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:35:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:01:10 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:13:21AM -0500, [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:01:10 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:13:21AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The right thing to say would be to specify what the voting system
>> will accept.
> Half way there. Now add "and mention which MUAs are known t
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 10:54:20 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 10:06:13AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> As for informing people, devotee sends in all the details ti can
>> gather. thge issue has been discussed on the mailing lists. Case
> Including
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:44:04 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 08:11:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hey, everyone knows there are all kinds of buggy software out
>> there. Conformant mailers don't have a problem. Buggy mailers
>> do. Why is thi
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 06:42:38 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 30 March 2007 at 00:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The setup is not borked. Sending in a non mangled ballot works
>> fine.
> ... which only works with certain MUAs, and which ones is not
> documented anywhere.
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:18:18 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 29 March 2007 at 21:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hmm, I am no longer seeing anything new in here. Seems like you
>> are whinging that the ballots are not constrained to ascii, and
>> your broken MUA(s) can't
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:15:38 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 29 March 2007 at 19:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So, if you are using software that does not conform to a RFC
>> published in '96, that's your funeral. Don;t expect us to keep
> It worked in 2006, 2005, 2004
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:55:34 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 29 March 2007 at 17:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It was not actually working. mailcrypt created something, and then
>> emacs went and was free to mangle it -- which means it is broken
>> for any message body t
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:01:21 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:42:14PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Since I do not think that UTF-8 is broken, I am unlikely to
> You are entitled to your own opinion. I prefer to let mine be guided
> by casual a
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:18:33 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:02:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:00:03 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>
>> > Please for reasoning below. If mailcrypt is usele
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:00:03 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Please for reasoning below. If mailcrypt is useless, lets remove it.
mailcrypt is not useless -- it was just used wrongly. In other
words, PEBKAC. mailcrypt still does what is has always done just as
wel
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007 21:27:04 +, Tony Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> But that's a bit different; things like make are implicitly
> supported and nobody would expect them not to be. But
> initramfs/initrd support is a feature that make-kpkg users have to
> specifically ask for. initrd and
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 22:37:55 +, Tony Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>> Hi, On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:25:07 +, Tony Houghton
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > initrd is deprecated, but make-kpkg is still geared towards that
>>
>> I think you ar
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007 08:00:09 -0500, Filipus Klutiero
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday 05 February 2007 13:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hi,
> [...]
>> b) Changing the name would be mischaracterization of the
>> capabilities of the package
> Why?
Because linux is just one of the tar
Hi,
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 15:03:51 +0100, Marc Haber
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:38:04AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> If a configuration file is removed, the package should be dealing
>> with old configuration files, since some of the tings mentioned
>> require packa
Hi,
Hmm. Well, can you edit the postinst in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8_2.6.16-14.postinst,
set DEBUG=1, and run
# /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-image-2.6.16-2-amd64-k8_2.6.16-14.postinst configure
as root?
I think I see a typo in the postinst, but I'd like to
Hi,
Darn. I forgot that debconf reexecs the script, so bash -x
only works until the point of the first execution. I think we'll
have to add a set -x just after the set -e line in /usr/bin/ucf, to
see where exactly is the script dying.
Can you please re-run this after editing /
Hi,
On 7 Feb 2006, Bart Martens told this:
> The attached patch fixes the bug.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bart Martens diff -ruN orig/mailagent-3.73/debian/postinst
> mailagent-3.73/debian/postinst
> --- orig/mailagent-3.73/debian/postinst 2006-02-07 15:13:58.0
> +0100
> +++ mailagent-3.73/d
41 matches
Mail list logo
