Martin-Éric Racine wrote in :
|su 1. jouluk. 2019 klo 18.44 Paride Legovini (p...@ninthfloor.org) kirjoitti:
|> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 wrote:
|>> Package: heirloom-mailx
|>> Version: 12.4-1.1+b1
|>> Severity: normal
|>>
|>> When piping text into heirloom-mailx, it fails to specify the charset
Hello Paride!
Paride Legovini wrote in :
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 28/06/2019:
|> Paride Legovini wrote in r.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 27/06/2019:
|>|> Paride Legovini wrote in |> o\
|>|> r.org>:
|>|>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 20/06/2019:
...
|&
Paride Legovini wrote in :
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 27/06/2019:
|> Paride Legovini wrote in r.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 20/06/2019:
|>|> the patch was reversed; here is the right one.
|>|
|>|Just to be sure, is your last "ivan.diff" patch all that&
has turned over to a SASL feature request by now.
But that is ok by me ^_^
|On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 5:28 PM Steffen Nurpmeso \
|wrote:
|>|>|No, this is actually success. I kdestroyed the ticket cache
|>|>|beforehand, and kinited.
|>|>
|>|> And isn't tha
Hello Paride.
Paride Legovini wrote in :
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 20/06/2019:
|> the patch was reversed; here is the right one.
|
|Just to be sure, is your last "ivan.diff" patch all that's needed to fix
|this bug? I would like to have it fixed in buster, but given that
Hello Ivan!
That is good news!!
Ivan Vučica wrote in :
|On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:55 AM Steffen Nurpmeso \
|wrote:
|> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20190619234414.zvcpd%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|> ...
|>|Dear Ivan. If you are willing to test once again, at [1] there is
|&g
Ach, sigh,
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in <20190619234414.zvcpd%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
...
|Dear Ivan. If you are willing to test once again, at [1] there is
|a complete ball, but you could also simply apply the attached
|patch instead, which is very much smaller.
|
|I am sorry f
Hello and good evening, Ivan.
Ivan Vučica wrote in :
|On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:56 PM Steffen Nurpmeso \
|wrote:
|>> What would be further useful debugging or tracing information to
|>> share?
|>
|> In general our -d or -vv switches would be nice. ^_^
|
|Here's
Hello Paride!
Paride Legovini wrote in :
|Ivan Vucica wrote on 19/06/2019:
|> Hi Steffen,
|>
|> Thanks for the quick fix!
|>
|> The ticket is now correctly obtained, but the GSSAPI authentication \
|> still fails.
|
|Thanks Ivan for the report and Steffen for looking into it. Once you c
Hello Ivan.
Ivan Vucica wrote in <20190619110145.gb3...@badc0de.net>:
|Thanks for the quick fix!
Thanks for going all the way in return!
|The ticket is now correctly obtained, but the GSSAPI authentication \
|still fails.
|
|I'd offer a debugging system, but unfortunately I have none availa
Hello dear Ivan Vučica!
Ivan Vučica wrote in :
|As an update, I've tried 14.9.13-1 from experimental as well, and the
|bug is present there too.
Very first: thank you very much for reporting this issue!
I am the upstream maintainer, and unfortunately i have been the
one who introduced this len
Hello Paride and Ben.
Paride Legovini wrote:
|On 2018-02-17 19:56, Ben Wong wrote:
|> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Paride Legovini <mailto:p...@ninthfloor.org>> wrote:
|> On 2018-02-17 18:30, Ben Wong wrote:
|>> On Sat, 18 Mar 2017 23:43:45 +0100 Steffen Nurpmes
rs and two project
|forks/renames, I would like to see someone else take over package
|maintenance.
I am sorry for this.
|I feel that s-nail is suitable package for people with little packaging
|experience to adopt. The current upstream author, Steffen Nurpmeso is
|quite active and very respons
Hallo.
Christoph Berg wrote:
|Re: Steffen Nurpmeso 2017-09-26 <20170926152012.hbcvl%stef...@sdaoden.eu>
|> I am the developer of that program and it seems the Debian
|> maintainer has quit.
|
|Hilko is still around, he's active on other packages.
Maybe the last gasp f
Hello.
Christoph Berg wrote:
|Package: heirloom-mailx
|Version: 14.8.16-1
|Severity: normal
|
|Description-en: feature-rich BSD mail(1) -- transitional package
| This dummy package is provided to provide a smooth upgrade path from
| heirloom-mailx to s-nail. It only contains symlinks to th
Norman Ramsey wrote:
|>|Sorry, I think I misunderstand something. I would think that
|>|participation in update-alternatives would be a packaging issue, not
|>|an upstream issue. And I don't see a connection to custom headers...
|>
|> It was my understanding that we have been removed as an
Norman Ramsey wrote:
|> Norman Ramsey wrote:
|> ...
|>|I expected /usr/bin/heirloom-mailx to be an alternative on this menu.
|>|
|>|This is possibly the same bug as 858080, but I don't know enough
|>|Debian jargon to know for sure.
|>
|> The just released S-nail/mailx v14.9.0 adds suppo
Norman Ramsey wrote:
|I upgraded from jessie to stretch, and I expected to continue using
|heirloom-mailx as my implementation of mailx. But my system was
|somehow switched to bsd-mailx. Worse, update-alternatives is not
|capable of changing back:
...
|I expected /usr/bin/heirloom-mailx to
Hello.
Hilko Bengen wrote:
|> Wasn't heirloom-mailx (the predecessor of s-nail) the primary mailx
|> provider for Debian?
|
|No, that must have been bsd-mailx.
|
|> In any event, h-m originally provided /usr/bin/mail and the upgrade path
|> causes this to disappear. Scripts breaking due t
Hi, Riccardo!
r.duc...@gmail.com wrote:
|DearSteffen
|
|My initial suggestion '%F %T' was just tentative, I do not care about it,
|
|I' really happy to know that you changed the default to
|+.Ql %Y-%m-%d %H:%M
Ok.
|Thanks a lot for your time
Fantastic. About four weeks and an enthusi
Hello again.
i wrote:
|So i have dropped the entire "default".rc stuff, because we will
|provide initial values for *datefield{-markout-older}*:
|
|+ ok_v_datefield, /* {i3val="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M"} */
|+ ok_v_datefield_markout_older, /* {i3val="%Y-%m-%d"} */
|
|I g
Hello,
i am the maintainer of S-nail, which is what one gets on a current
Debian when you install heirloom-mailx. (At least in testing it
is.)
The problem of yours likely is that the *sendwait* variable is not
set, i.e., your invocation should be
/usr/bin/heirloom-mailx -Ssendwait -s test roo
Hello.
"r.ductor" wrote:
|Package: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.16-1
|Severity: wishlist
|
|Dear Maintainer,
|
|thnaks a lot for thice nice software.
Thank you -- and it is getting better, i hope..
|You might want to consider changing the default datefield to '%F %T' \
|or other iso variants.
Hallo.
Hilko Bengen wrote:
|* Bas Zoetekouw:
|> s-nail/heirloom-mailx is not a proper alternative for mailx/bsd-mailx,
|> as it uses different command line options (for example on a regulair
|> mailx, -a means "add header, whereas for s-nail it means "add
|> attachment").
|
|We had some di
Hello.
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
|Package: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.14-1
|Severity: serious
|
|s-nail/heirloom-mailx is not a proper alternative for mailx/bsd-mailx,
|as it uses different command line options (for example on a regulair
|mailx, -a means "add header, whereas for s-nail it means "add
Hello on a Friiday ^.^,
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
|Package: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.5-3
|Severity: important
|
|heirloom-mailx used to provide an /usr/bin/mail on my system. I see
Regarding the overall philosophy behind mail / Mail / mailx and
S-nail it has to be said that compatibility flags
Hallo und guten Morgen!
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
|thank you very much for the detailed explanation of your security
|considerations. The concept looks sound for me.
Yes – i think it really is.
|And I keep /usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep SETUID root.
Huh. No chance against the Space Invaders
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
|May I ask where s-nail tries to write the "dotfile"?
|As far as I remember, mailx didn't need the sticky root bit before.
I forgot to say that i really put some effort into the manual (and
it will be even better in v14.9).
So the answer for this can also be found in t
Hallo Jörg-Volker,
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on 12/02/2015 12:22:
|> S-nail ships with a special, privilege-separated program that must
|> be installed SETUID root; it seems Debian installs this program as
|> "/usr/lib/s-nail/s-nail-privsep". Do
i wrote:
|Hello, i'm the codebase maintainer of S-nail,
|
|Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
||Package: s-nail
||Version: 14.8.5-3
|
||trying to read local mails in /var/mail with mailx fails with output as
||follows:
||
||Creating dotlock for "/var/mail/" .
||Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, a
Hello, i'm the codebase maintainer of S-nail,
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
|Package: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.5-3
|trying to read local mails in /var/mail with mailx fails with output as
|follows:
|
|Creating dotlock for "/var/mail/" .
|Unable to (dot) lock mailbox, aborting operation: Permi
Hello,
i'm the maintainer of the codebase of S-nail which seems to be on
its way to replace Heirloom-mailx on Debian.
This should be fixed when upgrading to s-nail.
--steffen
P.S.: sorry for not introducing myself: i am the maintainer of the
S-nail codebase. Thanks again.
--steffen
Hello, i'm the maintainer of the S-nail codebase,
Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
|Source: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.5-2
|User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
|Usertags: arm64
|
|It failed to build on several architectures:
|
|https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=s-nail&suite=sid
|
|It s
Hello!
Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
|Package: s-nail
|Version: 14.8.5-1
|Severity: serious
|Justification: Policy 11.6. Mail transport, delivery and user agents
|
|Hi
|
|Filling this as serious, as per Policy 11.6 sendmail is from
|/usr/sbin/sendmail. s-nail though has the problem that du
35 matches
Mail list logo
