Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily build netinstall 16.08.2004
uname -a:
Linux hansi 2.4.26-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 22 13:00:49 JST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
Tue Aug 17 16:18:30 CEST 2004
Method: network install not proxied, .at mirror,
Machine: sony vaio
Package: installation-reports
Version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso 22-Nov-2003
Severity: grave
installer is unusable because right away in the middle of kernel booting
appears a "melting" white screen.
xfree 4.1 and before the old sis driver showed this strange behaviour,
thomas winischhofer cured
Thank your for your helpfull email!!
> It sounds to me like there is a problem when the installer enables the
> frame buffer. Unfortunatly, the boot documentation is wrong, and there
> is no way to disable the framebuffer with beta 1 of the installer.
>
> Could you please try downloading a curr
On Sun, 21 Dec 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
[..]
> Sisfb should work on this hardware as of 2.4.18, but I am not sure. It's
> been a while since that came out. 2.4.20 is the oldest one I positively
> remember to contain a working sisfb.
i can confirm that sisfb works for 2.4.2[0-3]
so ther
thx Joey for fixing CDROM boot txt!
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Max, if you have time, could you compile a kernel with vesafb enabled
> and test this?
plain vesafb works fine, just booted up, relevant config:
-- config-2.4.23 snippet
# Frame-buffer support
#
CONFIG_FB=y
CO
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Max, could you please try connecting an external VGA monitor to your
> box, go through the installer and see if you can find out what exactly
> happens during boot (like syslog, dmesg, etc)?
just in a bit of hurry
checked on another vga monitor
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think you're right, it all goes by very fast here, even in vmware, but
> the code does a modprobe vesafb || modprobe vga16, and I see modprobe
> failing to load the former, then presumably it loads the latter.
thomas here the promised dmesg and syslog
the
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: alpha test rc1 from may 30
uname -a:
Date: 6. june 2004 ~16h
Method: sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, boot from scsi cdrom,
target ont scsi hard disc.
Machine: Digital Server 4000 - family Rawhide
Processor: 4
Memory: ~
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: alpha daily build
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/20040610/
uname -a:
Date: 11. june 2004 ~13h
Method: sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, boot from scsi cdrom,
target scsi hard disc.
Machine: Dig
Package: installation-reports
Severity: Normal
an-installer-version: sarge-alpha-netinst.iso daily build from 5. April
uname -a: (don't remember exactly but was 2.4.24)
Date: 07. April 2004
Method: boot from scsi cdrom, target root partition on scsi hard-disc
Machine: alpha rawhide
Pr
On Fri, 09 Apr 2004, maximilian attems wrote:
> the problem now was that the kernel panicked, because it couldn't find
> it's root fs .. tried lots of bootargs from aboot
forgot to mention that i used bsd disklabels to partition this harddisk ..
had a first empty partition of 50
hey steve,
thanks for your response and usefull bugs pointer!
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > 3) at this stage i strongly missed a menu-entry for aboot at d-i!!
>
> (!) I'll have to take a look at this; last I was able to test, aboot
> showed up right where it was supposed to
hello steve,
thanks for the explanations.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If the base system has installed successfully (and it won't with current
> images on alpha), the aboot installer should be run automatically.
waiting for a bug closure for some more testing,
on the mailinglis
bug is resolved in todays gcc-3.3 see bug #268338.
please report installation against package installation-reports.
thanks.
--
maks
kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 01:36:53PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-05-17 at 13:25 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > At the moment only spl is available in the archive, using dkms, and
> > > for zfs it's similar in the way of packaging though not uploaded yet.
> > > What we have (cod
hello steve,
thanks for your aboot infos.
the changes to the debian alpha kernel i refer to is the announcment of
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes
(linked that to a new kernel)
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200404/msg01002.html
from your wordings i assume tha
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: daily i386 20040525
uname -a:
Linux kourou 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: 26. may 2004 ~11h
Method: netboot.iso, not proxied via serial cable.
Machine: AMD 800 with Via mainboard
Processor:
From: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
the debian kernel team enjoys feedback of the shipped quality.
it has proven that kernelwise the desktop or laptop boxes are
often problematic thus add kerneloops there.
due to the size of kerneloops package it shouldn't be a problem.
it
hello,
please unblock klibc 1.5.10-1
was 10 days in unstable without trouble and fixes some utils.
no lib changes itself.
hpa just pushed out 1.5.11, i'd like to upload that tomorrow
as several more nice to have fixes in nfsmount + sh4 support
+ ext4dev fstype.
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSC
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.74.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
both latest releases of fedora and ubuntu ship with brasero.
it is much user friendlier then gnome-baker. it has active dev.
althought not yet as feature complete as k3b it's main feature
is the neat integration into the gnome desktop.
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sunday 22 June 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> I've prepared a set of patches against current kernel-wedge to update
> >> it.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> - ide-generic-pci
> >>
> >> I haven't add it si
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:16:23AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 03:42:55AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > > Kernel Team, please give us some guidance on that. Should we use
> > > ide
this thread goes no where.
loading a module on *all* boxes for 0.01% percent of the population
is not the right thing to do.
if you want some more informed statement read what fjp wrote down
or come up with a fine patch.
--
mask
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.74.2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
hotkey-setup seems not ready for mass consumption,
it recently added discover to it's dependency.
[Julien Cristau]
> Why do you care what X driver is going to be used? That sounds like
> a bad hack???
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Maximilian Attems]
> > hotkey-setup seems not ready for mass consumption,
> > it recently added discover to it's dependency.
>
> Can you explain why adding a dependency on discover make it unfit for
> mass consumpti
hello
now that d-i released last beta that 2.6.25 state in unstable
is fine, we'd want that backup option for the upcoming release
in testing.
please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6 2.6.25-2,
linux-modules-extra-2.6 2.6.25-5
thanks
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:20:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > hello
> >
> > now that d-i released last beta that 2.6.25 state in unstable
> > is fine, we'd want that backup option for the upcoming re
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (adding d-kernel and d-release)
>
> On Monday 07 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Thursday 03 July 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > >> > please hint linux-2.6 2.6.25-6, linux-kbuild-2.6
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:54:44PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080707 19:48]:
> > Changing kernel at this point of the release would be too destructive,
> > so unless there is a big fat problem in the .25 that the .26 should fix
> > and is unbackportable (do
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 07 July 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > There are valid arguments to be found for staying with 2.6.25 a bit
> > > longer, but "D-I has not yet converted to it" is NOT one of them.
> >
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:59:40AM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:54:44PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080707 19:48]:
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:43:49PM +0000, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 12:56:50PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 06:59:40AM +, maximilian attems wrote:
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:41:57PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > * Read-only bind mounts
> >
> > which can come in really handy for chroots and buildd.
> JFYI: recently 'bindfs' package was uploaded to Debian archive, it can
latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26
before final ack on that release.
the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by
waldi that is reviewed by vorlon to keep the lenny build
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by
> waldi that is reviewed by vorlon to keep the lenny build chain stable.
patch incorporating review got in.
thanks waldi and vorlon!
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorro
please unblock klibc 1.5.12-1 it contains mostly gcc-4.3 fixes,
even if not used for it's compilation would be good to have
them in stable.
also we have a grave packaging error in klibc, which causes
signal() not to be exported, see that message
http://marc.info/?l=util-linux-ng&m=121743832321246&
/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+klibc (1.5.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add backport 11_klibc-Default-signal-3-to-bsd_signal-3.patch.
+ * Adjust watch file.
+
+ -- maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:09:45 +0200
+
klibc (1.5.12-1) unstable; urgency=low
reassign rootskel
stop
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, sferriol wrote:
> Package: libklibc-dev
> Version: 1.4.30-2
> Severity: normal
>
> in d-i, building rootskel/src-bootfloppy/bin/timeout_read.c failed on
> alpha, amd64, ia64, s390
> undefined reference to '__FD_ZERO'
> undefined reference to '__FD_SET
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 06:08:08PM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> If you have any last minute changes which are that important they cannot
> wait for the first point release kernel, please list them here so we can
> discuss them.
- 2.6.16.X backports that are missing in 2.6.18.
- latest 2.
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 02:50:59PM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> * Frederik Schueler wrote:
> [...]
> > The upload should be scheduled for Tuesday, unless someone vetoes.
>
> Is there a new schedule already?
>
> Norbert
waiting for the upstream mm fix..
or in the improbable
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, David Härdeman wrote:
> Conclusion: provided that the two reports above are indeed
> unreproducible, that 2:1.0.4+svn16-2 in unstable migrates to
> testing, and that klibc-utils >= 1.4.30-2 migrates, cryptsetup should
> be fine.
that is expected to happen soonest.
happy
hi,
quick update on current linux-2.6 state.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> I would like to schedule the upload of the next linux-2.6 2.6.18
> version, with the following changes:
>
> 1. new vserver patch, breaks ABI
> 2. new Xen patch
> 3. Activate PAE on i386 Xen subarch, bre
heya,
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 07:38:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 10:36:32AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Frederik Schueler wrote:
> > > - mm alternative msync() fix
this is beeing tested for lsb compliance,
once there
tags 334104 -wontfix
tags 334104 pending
thanks
morning jurij,
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:36:12PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> tag 373621 wontfix
> thanks
>
> My attempt to actually do something about this ancient bug (#334104)
> has been blocked by Bastian Blank, who considers the proposed pat
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 10:50:26PM -0800, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> As I said, I don't think the solution of dropping the duplicate PCI
> IDs in different drivers for different architectures to be optimal.
> There is always a possibility that someone will insert an arbitrary
> PCI card into any b
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: netinstall 11. november
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/20041110/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a:
Linux axion 2.4.27-1-686 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:28:00 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date:
Thu Nov 11 16:06:58 CET
1 Description of the test
a) Short description of the test user
The male user is a 35 year old theoretical physics professor.
He is also the system administrator of this physics institute.
b) Short description of the test setup
Netinstall CD on quick university lan with no proxy, static network
the example snippet for pxe use is quite complicated.
belows simplified config works for me and is greatly inspired by
-> http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerBootpTFTP
yourfoobar may guide newbies like me. :-)
--
maks
Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/tftp/dhcp.xml
belows patch adds a note about how to start tftpd from xinetd.
--
maks
Index: installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml
===
--- installer/doc/manual/en/install-methods/install-tftp.xml(revision 24001)
+++ installer
belows patch adds a small hint where to find that tftp boot.
perhaps it makes user more confident. ;-)
but maybe to specific, maybe just added without the last phrase
with special case? i leave it up to you.
--
maks
Index: installer/doc/manual/en/boot-installer/i386.xml
===
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:19PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > belows patch adds a note about how to start tftpd from xinetd.
> >
> > --
> > maks
> >
>
> Thanks, but didn't I see just a patch
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:38PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > belows patch adds a small hint where to find that tftp boot.
> > perhaps it makes user more confident. ;-)
> >
> > but maybe to specific, maybe just ad
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 11:05:02PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > the example snippet for pxe use is quite complicated.
> > belows simplified config works for me and is greatly inspired by
> > -> http://w
hello,
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 06:11:53AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> I just want to point out that we have at Tuesday, 10.05 in the Hacklab
> the stable release BoF, which will give us a chance to discuss that
> topic. (Thanks to Frans for pointing out how usefull such a pointer
> would be.
latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
d-i uses in base-installer as confdir /target/etc/mkinitramfs/
in postinst. how should the transition happen?
could we coordinate an base-installer upload with newer
in
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:04:11AM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
> > for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
>
> Just a plain NACK.
On Wed, 24 May 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > latest initramfs-tools mv /etc/mkinitramfs /etc/initramfs-tools
> > for better consistency. (package on mentors not yet in unstable)
> >
> > d-i uses in base-installer as confdir /target/etc/mkinit
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 10:46:59PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote:
>
> I'm currently considering whether to change partman-auto-lvm so that the
> swap partition is created as a lvm lv rather than a separate partition,
> and I'd like to ask for some comments and feedback before doing so.
ack. cool,
heya, :)
klibc 1.4.11 has almost all binaries (kill, mknod, resume)
initramfs-tools 0.70 needs to successfully boot.
thus it is envisaged to deliver for etch an klibc only default
initramfs. the following steps are needed to ensure that decision:
- klibc-utils missing bin:
readlink (minimal alre
Package: partman-target
Version: 44
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
please apply belows patch,
to add the /proc line to fstab with nosuid.
rationale:
setuid and setgid bits have nothing lost in /proc, nice workaround
for kernel /proc vulnerability, see suggested at the lwn.net article:
http://lwn.ne
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, maximilian attems wrote:
>
> - prereqs mechanism:
> uses costly boot time and there is no easy solution to be first
> nor to be last. proposed solution is to remove it plainly.
> (scripts that don't use wouldn't be affected, as prereqs only
> ente
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.50
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
gthumb is a much better image viewer than eog.
found it missing on latest gnome-desktop install of daily snapshot.
--- tasksel-2.50/tasks/gnome-desktop.orig 2006-07-23 23:17:30.0
+0200
+++ tasksel-2.50/tasks/gnome-desktop
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.50
Severity: wishlist
rationale:
either webmail or pop3/imap via thunderbird/evolution are the highest
probable case for laptop+desktop user.
expert user will want anyway better configurability
of the exim4 configs.
exim4, popularity-contest and xorg warning were the
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 03:14:10PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 14:27]:
> > Scott has a nice script that converts the fstab,
> > that will of course only work with initramfs-tools.
>
> Any idea where this
In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hello,
> Comments/Problems:
> The machine is set to install on /dev/md0 raid1. The installer worked
> like a charm, and on reboot into the live system I end up with major
> failure, the scripts try to start the raid system with mdrun but I end
> up with the error;
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:14:55PM -0700, Jason Self wrote:
> On 7/27/06, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Backporting the necessary changes is certainly an option. I would
> >think this is up to the powerpc Porters to handle.
>
> Thank you. I'll continue to pursue this on debian-powerp
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:06:50PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 01:14:55PM -0700, Jason Self wrote:
> >> On 7/27/06, Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>&g
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > we are about to stabilize 2.6.17, although we won't backport 2.6.18
> > stuff, as from the timing 2.6.18 looks good. 2.6.18 has features for
> > several archs ppc, amd64 (smp
sorry for the late dropin, haven't seen that before today #498712
came in. which clearly shows the uglyness of the current situation,
why should the same variable be set on *two* places.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 25 August 2008, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > - the question w
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:05:47PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:02:05PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Subject: Re: lenny regression initrd/lvm/ rootfs detection timeout
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Florian Lohoff w
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:54:59PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:10:47PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > > > standard answer boot with
> > > > rootdelay=X
> > >
> > > It worked with etch without that parameter and the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 02:20:13PM +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
> after upgrading an FSI RX/300 from etch to lenny the machine would not
> boot anymore. It got stuck in the initrd not beeing able to find the
> root filesystem. The cause was that the aacraid took too long to make
> the root
/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+initramfs-tools (0.92n) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ [ Eugene Paskevich ]
+ * hook-functions: Fix MODULES=dep for lvm LABEL fstab notation.
+(closes: #508906)
+
+ [ maximilian attems ]
+ * all_generic_ide: Also parse boolean bootoption. (closes
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 12:53:31PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> > Those should all be set for powerpc and should also be available during
> > installation. Please check:
> > - whether these modules are present
> > - whether they are loaded automatically
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, you wrote:
> > the new stack is very promising,
> > we will reconsider later if no eth1394 shows up,
> > for now that's just a minor regression.
>
> No, that is not a "minor" regression. Half the functionality of the old
> dri
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:32:44PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
> It would be great if also eth1394 would reappear in the new stack,
> especially since the original developer is an @debian.org person.
>
you seem to have a strange confidence in someone, whose stack went
so badly down the roa
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:50:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The device was listed in d-i because people were using it. This thread is
> here because they can no longer do so. It's rather rude of you to declare
> that it's ok for the kernel team to "fix" usability issues in the installer
mkfs.ext3 /dev/dualvg0/foo > /dev/null
mke2fs 1.40.2 (12-Jul-2007)
tune2fs -l /dev/dualvg0/foo | grep features
Filesystem features: has_journal resize_inode dir_index filetype
sparse_super
Signed-off-by: maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
packages/autopartkit/auto
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:58:45PM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> I'd like to propose enabling Xen guest support in all the native i?86
> kernel images (and eventually amd64 too), or at least in the -686-bigmem
> kernel. Since paravirt ops is already enabled in all kernels (for KVM
> and lguest) the
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Unfortunately the Xen domain builder isn't capable of loading a native
> bzImage directly -- it requires the ELF vmlinux. I hacked
> around that when I was playing with Xen enabled d-i and
> then promptly forgot I had done so, which is a shame because it'
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.71
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
transmission is an easy and fast lightweight BitTorrent client.
gnome-btdownload lacks many features in comparison.
---
tasks/gnome-desktop |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tasks/gnome-desktop b/t
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> Hello RM and SRM teams,
>
> I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
> gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to
> delay d-i release.
nacked as maintainer,
you are blocking for more then 2 wee
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> linux-2.6 can't migrate to testing with normal delays before 2008-02-21. The
> planned beta release on 2008-03-03 is 11 days later.
>
> Also, this assumes that linux-2.6 2.6.24-4 will migrate to testing. In
> reality, it's unlikely that linux-2.6
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> > that is totally untrue.
> > linux-2.6 always needs hint from the release team to migrate.
> > properly set up it can happen in less then a week.
> What do you mean? What "it" can happen in less than one week?
omg, what are we talking about?
migra
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 03:06:58PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Mario Lang, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 17:28:32 +0100, a écrit :
> >> Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > (speakup can now be compiled fully independently)
> >
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 06:50:01PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 18:39:54 +, a écrit :
> > Apply patches/kernel-integration-2.6.24-source.patch to the main kernel
> > source to GPL-export 4 symbols,
>
> Note: by that, I mean to pick that patch into the reg
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:43:47PM +, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> maximilian attems, le Tue 25 Mar 2008 20:13:30 +0100, a écrit :
> >
> > once it is in next
>
> "in next"?
next is the linux tree of things that are ready for the next
merge window aka 2.6.26 now
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ah, so since Lenny's d-i is supposed to use 2.6.24, speakup won't make
> it into it :/
as otavio said we gonna release with > 2.6.24
for debian 2.6.24 stuff would have to go through the stable releases.
7 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to fi
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.73
Severity: wishlist
kerneloops allows to track oopses accross distribution
and versions. it is default installed since fedora 9.
it be really cool if Lenny would ship it too.
it would allow to have better feedback of the shipped
quality of the corresponding Linux ima
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> My opinion is that this will still be useful even if people with headless
> servers don't activate it. I think many more people encounter kernel
> bugs on desktop Debian machines than they do on servers.
ack
yes please add it to the gnome, kde and xfc
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 01:37:23AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> reassign 475525 linux-2.6 2.6.22-6
> retitle 475525 Both sis5513 and pata_sis claim 1039:5513
> thanks
>
> On Saturday 12 April 2008, Facundo Ariel Pérez wrote:
> > Here they go ...
>
> Thanks. This shows that indeed two modules are cur
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > * 2.4 support now officially dropped
> > Starting with RC1 d-i will no longer support 2.4 based installations.
> > All arches have been switched now and some cleanup has been started;
> > more cleanup is expected and this may caus
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 04:27:19PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> Op 16-10-2006 om 00:06 schreef Frans Pop:
> > On Sunday 15 October 2006 23:45, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > The thing I would like to see is that the _difference_ in device naming
> > > between d-i kernel plus fellows and installed ke
reassign 397950 debian-installer-utils
stop
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 05:45:49PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this system usually boots from an internal SATA disk (/dev/sda). I
> recently added an external IEEE1394 disk and when I tried to reboot
> the system, it failed. /dev/sda had b
> I think it would be nice if the first boot of the newly installed system
> would occur with kexec, avoiding BIOS and boot loader "loss of time".
well kexec has not yet the coverage in the wild,
so kexec boot failures are expected.
i routinely use in on a x41, there ipw2200 does panic and needs
a
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Joey Hess wrote:
> sferriol wrote:
> > yes, but it is the only solution that i've found because cpio is not in
> > klibc-utils
> > and it frees ~80k on bootfloppy because we do not use all klibc commands
>
> A klibc udeb would not need to include all klibc commands, but only
On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, sferriol wrote:
> maximilian attems a écrit :
> >klibc-utils produces an udeb, currently it adds all the commands.
> >if you want to restrict that choice, please tell which you want
> >and it's easy to put just those in.
> >
> the klibc com
thanks to kylem for fixing the failure upstream.
afaik the sparc porter and the release team haven't
made any decision concerning sparc32 for lenny.
so i think it is only logical to reenable it.
regards
--
maks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
klibc switched to linux-libc-dev thus
ending the FTBFS when linux headers bump abi.
relevant mips patch landed upstream.
klibc-utils-floppy-udeb is enhanced
newer upstream has more fstype support, i'll upload soon.
so i'd like to have that in testing once the 10 sid days
are passed.
regards
--
[trimmed long reviewer cc, added debian-boot and fjp ]
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> On Thu Aug 16, 2007 at 18:27:58 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > dann frazier wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 04:05:12PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> > >
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
