1 Description of the test a) Short description of the test user The male user is a 35 year old theoretical physics professor. He is also the system administrator of this physics institute.
b) Short description of the test setup Netinstall CD on quick university lan with no proxy, static networking. Box is a common sony laptop. After second stage most done through ssh via users workstation. hardware details in #280768. 2 Question on the test user about his level of experience a) Debian Linux experience of the test user system administrator of ~70 Debian workstations + some server. b) Free software experience of the test user daily use of fvwm, tex, vi, dselect, .. d) Expectations regarding Debian easy upgrade and maintenance (paid for doing physics). e) Expectations of the Debian-installer (short d-i) bad, as failed on his first try when d-i switched to partman. 3 d-i installation manual. no remarks as not consulted. 4 The installation process with d-i The test user chooses english, as country austria, german as keyboard layout. Surprised that d-i already knows that his network has no dhcp. Enters Network configuration and is once more surprised that d-i knows the hostname and domainname. User already seems pleased about d-i! The partitioner comes up with the choice of erasing the hard disc or to manually edit the partition table. Later is chosen. User takes a bit of a time to realise how to choose the partition. No hint on the template related to the <enter> key. User press <enter>. (blind guess and it works). The 3 partition is chosen to be ext3 and /. seconds later the user is prompted for grub. the user prefers lilo so chooses go back. lilo is placed on mbr. second stage works quick. user doesn't choose anything in tasksel. he prefers known dselect. ;) user resets debconf to high, wonders a bit why it got medium!? (lilo choice - reported as wishlist in installation-report). installs xserver and the rest of his known stuff from his workstation. as the default for the xserver is not to choose the autodetection and he knowns anyway the graphics card - this path is choosen. 5. Conclusions The d-i templates provided either good information or already good defaults for a user with debian experience. The user is very charmed by d-i and happy that the sarge installer does such a good job. woody getting old for the desktops setups (mozilla, gnome/kde, no openoffice) he is very confident in sarge. Although he would prefer to have better xfree integration in the hardware detection of d-i. comment: "Things gotten better since the 30 diskette installs on 386." -- maks kernel janitor http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/ ps this is a follow up to a previous d-i usability test, *) which featured a novice debian user. will do so from time to time when a d-i install pops up in my env. *) http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/09/msg01737.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
