I'm attempting a network install of Sarge. I PXE-booted off my LAN.
Since my local mirror is incomplete I'm installing through my modem.
I've discovered that d-i is downloading lots of stuff it won't need -
pcmcia stuff, firewire stuff etc.
Worse, it's downloading modules for two kernels. Since i
Quoting John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm attempting a network install of Sarge. I PXE-booted off my LAN.
>
> Since my local mirror is incomplete I'm installing through my modem.
>
> I've discovered that d-i is downloading lots of stuff it won't need -
> pcmcia stuff, firewire stuff etc.
Well, be
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 257964 wishlist
Bug#257964: countrychooser: Translation breaks the countries names ordering
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> reassign 251418 countrychooser
Bug#251418: Should sort translated choices alphabetically
Bug reassigned from package `cde
severity 257964 wishlist
reassign 251418 countrychooser
clone 251418 -1 -2
reassign -1 po-debconf
reassign -2 debconf
retitle -1 Please generate Indices fields automatically for use by cdebconf (and
debconf later))
retitle -2 Please support the use of Indices fields for sorting Select/Multiselect
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting John ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm attempting a network install of Sarge. I PXE-booted off my LAN.
Since my local mirror is incomplete I'm installing through my modem.
I've discovered that d-i is downloading lots of stuff it won't need -
pcmcia stuff, firewire stuff etc
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:39:40AM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther writes:
>
> > Jens, will you upload powerpc 2.6.7-3 too ? -2 will not be buildable
> > because of the asfs patch move i believe ?
>
> That's okay, the asfs patch moved in 2.6.7-2 already.
Ah, ok.
> > I need
Christian Perrier wrote:
Well, as mentioned above the general design choices have been made for
having d-i as versatile as possible. This includes the choice of
downloading a lot of stuff, sure. A part of this design choice is
motivated by the fact that people with low bandwidth will probably use
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05.html has this link:
5.1.7. i386 Boot Parameters
which leads to the top of
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s01.html#id2513778
The info I expected to see is at
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s02.html
5.2. Boot Paramete
NSTALL_MEDIA_DEV
This is silent on what the alternatives are. It gives one example, but
how does one specify
USB?
CD?
firewire?
Network location?
ATA disk?
SCSI disk?
What should the media contents be? a USB drive could be an entire Debian
mirror - forget thumbdrives and such, I have a 40 Gbyt
These are the 2.4 files:
2450662 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.gz
1208 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.list
3686400 Jul 7 02:33 mini.iso
811877 Jul 7 02:33 vmlinuz
This produces numerous modprobe messages that it can't find
/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/modules.dep and then stops.
The corresponding 2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 257969 minor
Bug#257969: netcfg: No "ok" button when statically configuring the network
Severity set to `minor'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Hello,
Many thanks for your message.
I tried to install with both options, kernel 2.4.x and 2.6.x, expert modes.
I am using Conectiva Linux 9.0.
The modules.conf is below. You could see at the end the ide, mod-sr and
ide-scsi modules.
Please, also take a look at the fstab sent at another previous
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:56:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#231836: Does plip work now?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 06:53:47 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>Quoting Herbert Kaminski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
[...]
>> Machine: plain vanilla i386 from parts
>> Processor: AMD K6-2 500MHz
>> Memory: 96MB
>> Root Device: 40GB IDE /dev/hdb1
>> Root Size/partition table: 39GB ext3 on hdb1, 512 MB swap o
Am Die, den 06.07.2004 schrieb Nathan Hurst um 7:36:
> Hello,
> I did some simple user testing yesterday using some windows experienced,
> linux newbie people to install debian using the new sarge installer. I
> watched and took notes, but didn't get involved. Here are my results:
I think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:49, John wrote:
> I'm PXE-booting. Here's the stanza, the same in each case:
> label 4
> kernel images/sarge/vmlinuz
> append initrd=images/sarge/net-initrd.gz vga=6
>
You may need to add 'devfs=mount root
Final Notice!We have tried
to contact you 2 times, with no success. Your lo
an has been appr\oved at 3.o %, but we need more
information from you. This will only take a
second, then a
representative will contact you.
secure
link for AppID 10749
Thanks
Pope
yhvpztlbb hkosmaci rgazweth ykoyr j
Quoting Herbert Kaminski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> But then, installing the base system fails. VC4, shows an error message
> about a syntax error in base-installer.postinst: 'Unexpected "fi"
> expecting "then"' .
> I made a screenshot, see http://www.medvillage.de/debian/ .
This bug seem to have b
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: July 5, 2004
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/ia64/current/sarge-ia64-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux vanile 2.4.26-1-itanium-smp #1 SMP Tue Jul 5 20:39:36 MDT 2004 ia64
unknown (time could be wrong)
Date: Jul 5, 2004 20:39
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > 7) general feeling that the installer asked too many questions.
> Do you know of any particular question that could be avoided?
I guess this is related to the user choosing low priority...or
"expert" mode.
> > 9) being in Australia, the timezones
[ Please keep that on list!!]
Am Mit, den 07.07.2004 schrieb Ben Kinder um 14:01:
> Why not using Synaptic at installation time?
Because you can't run Synaptic without X probably :-)
>
>
>
> --- Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Die, den 06.07.2004 schrieb Nathan Hurst um 7:36
base-installer_0.091_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_0.091.dsc
base-installer_0.091.tar.gz
base-installer_0.091_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
rootskel_0.83_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.83.dsc
rootskel_0.83.tar.gz
rootskel_0.83_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.83_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.83_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
base-installer_0.091.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.091.dsc
base-installer_0.091.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.091.tar.gz
base-installer_0.091_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.091_powerpc.udeb
Announcing to [EMA
Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:49, John wrote:
I'm PXE-booting. Here's the stanza, the same in each case:
label 4
kernel images/sarge/vmlinuz
append initrd=images/sarge/net-initrd.gz vga=6
You may need to add 'devfs=mount
Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:49, John wrote:
I'm PXE-booting. Here's the stanza, the same in each case:
label 4
kernel images/sarge/vmlinuz
append initrd=images/sarge/net-initrd.gz vga=6
You may need to add 'devfs=mount
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.83_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.83_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.83_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.83_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.83.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.83.dsc
rootskel_0.83.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
Hello all,
I have recently joined the mailing list and would
like to request some mentoring in helping out on the
debian boot project.
Where do I start? What do I have to know in advance
before omitting such pretentious statements? ;)
Is there any coding needed what so ever? Etc..
Ofcou
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 06:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: greetings.
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have recently joined the mailing list and would
> like to request some mentoring in helping out on the
> debian boot project.
>
>
> Where do I start? What do I have to know in
> ad
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 08:18:18PM +0800, John wrote:
> I guess that improved things. Now it can't find
> /var/lib/cdebconf/{questions,templates}.dat and is saying so repeatedly.
Sounds like an out-of-date rootskel. Unfortunately you didn't say which
image you were using. We need the URL from whi
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:34:56 +0800, John wrote:
>Even if bandwidth didn't cause problems, the fact that it downloads so
>much junk means I can't install in 64 Mbytes.
This must be a problem of your special setup. Using the files
'netboot.initrd.gz' and 'vmlinuz' from
http://people.debian.org/~
correction to my mail just sent a few minutes ago:
the files I download are vmlinuz and initrd.gz, not
netboot.initrd.gz
sorry ;-)
Herbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The title says it all.
I just did an unstable PXE-netboot installation (priority medium) and saw the
new tasksel. Very nice, sure.
The 'manual selection' option gives me aptitude.
But I _like_ dselect. It's clean, straightforward, easy (once you kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I've just downloaded the netboot installation files (20040706) from:
- - 2.4: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot
- - 2.6: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/2.6/
If I PXE-boot with the 2.6 kernel, the transl
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 03:08:28PM +0300, Aurimas Mikalauskas wrote:
> And of course, the /dev/ida/c0d0p1 is not a block device, it doesn't
> even exist. The partition list looks like this:
>
> /dev/ida/disc0/part1 on /target type ext2 (rw)
> /dev/ida/disc0/part3 on /target/home type ext2 (rw)
> /
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:15:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> I just did an unstable PXE-netboot installation (priority medium) and saw the
> new tasksel. Very nice, sure.
> The 'manual selection' option gives me aptitude.
>
> But I _like_ dselect. It's clean, straightforward, easy (once you know
John wrote:
> Worse, it's downloading modules for two kernels. Since it booted a 2.4
> kernel, it can't possibly use 2.6 modules.
The installer should not do that. Send us your /var/log/syslog from
inside the installer, or /var/log/debian-installer/syslog from the
installed system.
> More, my bo
John wrote:
> These are the 2.4 files:
> 2450662 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.gz
>1208 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.list
> 3686400 Jul 7 02:33 mini.iso
> 811877 Jul 7 02:33 vmlinuz
>
> This produces numerous modprobe messages that it can't find
> /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/modules.dep and the
I have received your morttgage information
and will begin processing it.We will forward on
your information to one of our professional
estate planners and they will be in contact with
you shortly.But first, to ensure the best
results, we'll need some more
information.Please fill out the final
de
Frans Pop wrote:
> The title says it all.
>
> I just did an unstable PXE-netboot installation (priority medium) and saw the
> new tasksel. Very nice, sure.
> The 'manual selection' option gives me aptitude.
>
> But I _like_ dselect. It's clean, straightforward, easy (once you know it ;-)
> and
[Please CC to me, I'm not on the list]
Hello!
I tried installing sarge/testing to Compaq Proliant DL360 server today.
I grabbed sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/current/.
The iso image seems to be created 05-Jul-2004 22:52.
The "Compaq Integr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 258055 d-i
Bug#258055: (no subject)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> retitle 258055 only includes /dev/ida on i386, needed on ia64 also
Bug#258055: (no subject)
Chang
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 15:34:56 +0800, John wrote:
Even if bandwidth didn't cause problems, the fact that it downloads so
much junk means I can't install in 64 Mbytes.
This must be a problem of your special setup. Using the files
'netboot.initrd.gz' and 'vmlinuz' from
As I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 16:26, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> I doubt that it's loading the whole initrd in either case. Pass
> initrd_size=1 or so.
Hmmm. What tftp server are you using?
You will need a TFTP server with 'tsize' support. On a Debian GNU/Li
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
correction to my mail just sent a few minutes ago:
the files I download are vmlinuz and initrd.gz, not
netboot.initrd.gz
I'm using the netboot images.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aurimas Mikalauskas wrote:
> After installing the base system, kernel install reports an error,
> that the kernel 'kernel-image-2.4.26-1-mckinley-smp' could not be
> installed and it says to check /var/log/messages for errors. That's
> what I found in the log:
>
> The following NEW packages will b
Joey Hess wrote:
John wrote:
Worse, it's downloading modules for two kernels. Since it booted a 2.4
kernel, it can't possibly use 2.6 modules.
The installer should not do that. Send us your /var/log/syslog from
inside the installer, or /var/log/debian-installer/syslog from the
installed system.
N
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> "Unable to install GRUB in (hd0)
> Executing 'grub-install (hd0)' failed.
> This is a fatal error"
>
> and in the console 3:
>
> "Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time.
> /dev/ida/c0d0p2 does not have any corresponding BIOS drive."
>
> that c0d0
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
> tags 258010 d-i
Bug#258010: AMD64 install report for HP DL585, cciss detection problem
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
> clone 258010 -1
Bug#258010: AMD64 install report fo
Your message dated Wed, 07 Jul 2004 11:02:02 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#257828: fixed in base-config 2.35
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> Then I tried to do an lvm install, only to be greeted by "no physical
> volumes available" (paraphrased from memory) no matter what I did. So I
> went for a guided partition creaton and then converted the large /home to
> an lvm2 physical volume after the install.
>
> I
Joey Hess wrote:
John wrote:
These are the 2.4 files:
2450662 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.gz
1208 Jul 7 02:33 initrd.list
3686400 Jul 7 02:33 mini.iso
811877 Jul 7 02:33 vmlinuz
This produces numerous modprobe messages that it can't find
/lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/modules.dep and then st
Hi,
At 7 Jul 04 14:21:55 GMT,
Frans Pop wrote:
> I've just downloaded the netboot installation files (20040706) from:
> - - 2.4: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot
> - - 2.6: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/netboot/2.6/
>
> If I PXE-boot with the 2.6 kernel,
base-config_2.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-config_2.35.dsc
base-config_2.35.tar.gz
base-config_2.35_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
rootskel_0.84_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_0.84.dsc
rootskel_0.84.tar.gz
rootskel_0.84_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.84_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.84_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 16:24, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 04:15:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> Why not install nothing and then run dselect by hand?
Yes, that's what I did in the end. However I think the text in the main screen
n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:22, John wrote:
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05.html has this link:
> 5.1.7. i386 Boot Parameters
>
> which leads to the top of
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s01.html#id2513778
>
> The
What is the status and usability of the various disc partitioners in d-
i? I realize that 'partman' is the one that gets used by a non-expert
install, and that in an expert install, 'autopartkit' is an option.
I think I see that 'partman' supports some kind of recipe. Is that
right?
What I'm lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 16:54, Kenshi Muto wrote:
> If this image uses Linux 2.6.7, it's maybe #257970.
Yes, kernel is 2.6.7.
Thanks for your reaction.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA7B8Ugm/Kwh6ICoQRApurAJ4
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_0.84_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_0.84_i386.udeb
rootskel-locale_0.84_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_0.84_i386.udeb
rootskel_0.84.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_0.84.dsc
rootskel_0.84.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/root
Accepted:
base-config_2.35.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.35.dsc
base-config_2.35.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.35.tar.gz
base-config_2.35_all.deb
to pool/main/b/base-config/base-config_2.35_all.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 257828
Thank
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:57 +, digital fredy wrote:
> 4 put rescue mode for recover the system
I would like to see a small DFS (Debian From Scratch) Live-CD on the
same disc as d-i, so that it can be dual-booted to either the installer
or a rescue CD. Or, perhaps the rescue system could have
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 11:07:24AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > "Unable to install GRUB in (hd0)
> > Executing 'grub-install (hd0)' failed.
> > This is a fatal error"
> >
> > and in the console 3:
> >
> > "Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time.
>
Perhaps a boot option could be added that has it call 'fbset' to set the
fbcon to 104x768 or 800x600 depending? Some of the live-CD's have a
kernel option to set the screen size, and others are using a different
kernel line in the boot loader to set it from the kernel command line
with the vga= op
Package: partman
Version: 40
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to see better prompting when choosing to format a partition.
After the usage method is set to format, prompting should be automatic
for file system and mount point (ala partconf).
Another option would be to default the file system and pe
Due to high work load during the whole day and no free time in the
evening today, I will be unable to make the summary for the Debian
Installer meeting which was held on Tuesday July 6th.
This may happen later...or may not happen, if I reach the week-end
with no more free time..:-)
--
--
To
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> If I PXE-boot with the 2.6 kernel, the translations in languagechooser for RTL
> languages or languages containing accents are not displayed correctly (square
> blocks for non-ascii characters).
> The same happens with the 20040705 sid_d-i netinst ISO.
Package: netcfg-static
Version: 0.72
Severity: important
Tags: patch
IUCV is a point-to-point connection type, but netcfg-static was not
detecting it as such. I have included a patch that fixes this.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700
Package: s390-netdevice
Version: 0.05
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I've implemented IUCV support for S/390. It seems to work--I'm doing an
installation with it now.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing')
Architecture: s390
Quoting Adam Thornton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> +Type: boolean
> +Default: true
> +_Description: Is this configuration correct?
> + The configured parameter is:
> + peer = ${peer}
I'm not completely happy with such template. This too much relies on
the long description being displayed *after* the
I forgot an fclose. Here's an updated patch.
Adam
--- netdevice.c.orig2004-07-07 14:50:40.0 -0400
+++ netdevice.c 2004-07-07 14:49:16.0 -0400
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
static int device_selected, device_ctc_protocol, device_qeth_lcs_port;
static char *device_qeth_portname, *device
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: Beta 4 -- http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
uname -a: Linux debian-www 2.6.3-1-386 #2 Tue Feb 24 20:20:23 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Jun 17, 2004
Method: Booted off of installer CD and select the 2.6 kernel
Package: installation-reports
(B
(BDebian-installer-version: beta 4 from cdimage.debian.org on 2004/07/03
(Buname -a: Linux soudapc 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
(BDate: 2004/07/04
(BMethod:
(BInstalled using 110MB CD image. Network install from ftp.jp.debian.or
Package: base-installer
Version: 0.090
Severity: important
line 680 of base-installer.postinst should be
if [ "$subarch" != none ]; then
(the "; then" is missing in the downloaded file).
This is the version that is getting downloaded for an "unstable" build
on S/390 at about 3:00 PM C
Package: di-utils-reboot
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I find it convenient sometimes (especially when using UML) to have d-i halt
the system as its final step, rather than rebooting it. Rebooting in UML
re-execs the kernel with exactly the same command line, which causes the
installer to be sta
On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 15:44, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Package: di-utils-reboot
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> I find it convenient sometimes (especially when using UML) to have d-i halt
> the system as its final step, rather than rebooting it.
This will also be very useful for S/390, for t
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 06:16:36AM -0700, Ben Kinder wrote:
>2) kindly provide me with the link.
Please read the information at [0] [1].
[0] http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
[1] http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DebianInstallerMeetings
Regards,
Anibal Monsalve Salazar
--
.''`. Deb
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jul 2004 14:21:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 0.091
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 255505 +wontfix
Bug#255505: 10b9:5451 should use ali5451 module
There were no tags set.
Tags added: wontfix
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Yet another tweak to the patch: this one writes module option
information to /etc/modutils/options.
I really don't know where the line
"option iucv0 iucv=" should go, or how that's going to get
automatically moved from the installer system to the installer system.
What's the right answer for thi
Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Anyway, here's a patch:
>
> http://www.no-name-yet.com/patches/debian-installer-utils.reboot-halt.diff
So the idea is to set di-utils-reboot/halt at the boot line or similar,
and never really ask the question?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Wed, 7 Jul 2004 23:39:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
kbd-chooser_0.58_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_0.58.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.58.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.58_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 257356 hw-detect
Bug#257356: installation-reports: more sata problems
Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `hw-detect'.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_0.58.dsc
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.58.dsc
kbd-chooser_0.58.tar.gz
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.58.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_0.58_i386.udeb
to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.58_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your cont
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
kbd-chooser_0.58_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and the p
reassign 257356 hw-detect
Thanks
This is not a problem in discover1-data. The device kernel module for
this SATA device is correctly listed. If this is a real bug, it's
probably in hw-detect.
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:19:39AM +0200, Anders Lennartsson wrote:
> drive. I have not tested to continu
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 05:32:44PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > Anyway, here's a patch:
> >
> > http://www.no-name-yet.com/patches/debian-installer-utils.reboot-halt.diff
>
> So the idea is to set di-utils-reboot/halt at the boot line or similar,
> and never really ask the
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:19:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: discover1-data
> Version: 1.2004.02.08-8
> Severity: normal
>
> My test laptop has firewire, and discover1 doesn't load the controller.
> It's this item in lspci:
>
> :02:0a.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IE
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:17:31 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#258010: AMD64 install report for HP DL585, cciss detection problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 07:56:41AM +0200, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
> Output of lspci and lspci -n:
> :02:04.0 RAID bus controller: Compaq Computer Corporation Smart Array 5i/532
> (rev 01)
> :02:06.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
> Ethernet (rev 10)
Your message dated Thu, 8 Jul 2004 00:21:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line discover issue probably fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 12:07:50AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> :00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:2448 (rev 42)
> :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BAM/CAM PCI Bridge (rev 42)
> ?
I don't think this needs a kernel module.
>
> :00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:248c (rev 02)
> :00:1
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 12:19:59PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:1a30 (rev 04)
> 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge (rev 04)
> 80861a30bridge ignore 82845 845 (Brookdale) Chipset Host Bridge
dunno.
> 00:1e.0 C
hello
i will not be here next week, and i don't know if i have to commit this
patch before RC1
so i attach the patches for S10lowmem and anna.c file
test it for other arches,
joey will decide to put it or not for RC1
bye
sylvain
Index: S10lowmem
===
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:19:46PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Package: discover1-data
> > Version: 1.2004.02.08-8
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > My test laptop has firewire, and discover1 doesn't load the controller.
> > It's this item in lspci:
> >
> > :02:0a.0 FireW
Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 10:22, John wrote:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05.html has this link:
5.1.7. i386 Boot Parameters
which leads to the top of
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch05s01.html#id2513778
T
Package: libdebian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
With this patch, di_system_devfs_map_from can generate correct mappings for
UML ubd devices.
http://uml-goodness.no-name-yet.com/patches/libdebian-installer.ubd.diff
-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable
APT prefers unstable
Frans Pop wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 07 July 2004 16:26, Joey Hess wrote:
I doubt that it's loading the whole initrd in either case. Pass
initrd_size=1 or so.
Hmmm. What tftp server are you using?
You will need a TFTP server with 'tsize' support. On a Deb
As I mentioned in another thread I planned to do, I've implemented
transparent proxy for the install.
Sadly, it does't work. Here is why:
1089246525.683 19 192.168.9.133 TCP_DENIED/400 1523 GET
/debian//dists/sarge/Release - NONE/- text/html
HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request
Server: squid/2.5.STABLE
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
