Bug#220117: Installation report

2003-11-26 Thread Wilmer van der Gaast
Alastair McKinstry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The default keyboard is the same as it was for woody; whar is the best > default keyboard for Dutch language users ? Most people here "just" type US-qwerty. In fact, except for some people who type dvorak, I only know US-qwerty typists here. Some st

Bug#219888: anna: Give the user full control of modules to be installed

2003-11-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > Ok, I'll look into these too. I'll test the new patch and send it > tomorrow evening. Well, this was more like 2 weeks, but here is a patch anyway. Can someone have a look ? (to anna's changelog too, BTW, it looks weird.) Changes:

Bug#219528: Random root tmpfs filesystem size.

2003-11-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
tag 219528 - patch thanks (i hope i got it right, it's the first time i use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is it ok to CC the bug report ?) On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:15:08AM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > I think the limit should be set manually (as documented in > /usr/src/linux/Documentation/filesystems/tm

Re: cvs commit to debian-installer/libdebian-installer/src by waldi

2003-11-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Joey Hess] > Please stop committing large changes to this very core part of d-i. I agree to this. We need to be more conservative with the changes to libd-i. > These changes will not be accepted into the next beta. The core of > d-i is frozen. Some of the changes will have to be accepted. Get

Bug#222223: installation-reports

2003-11-26 Thread Szymon Juraszczyk
Package: installation-reports Version: Debian Installer beta 1 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso downloaded on 2003-11-20 uname -a: N/A Date: 2003-11-20 Method: CD Machine: Intel ISP 2150G Processor: 2 x PI

Re: (low priority) udeb naming

2003-11-26 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Joey Hess schrieb: On 13 Dec 2000 I wrote: James Troup wrote: You can't have a .udeb with the same name as a .deb; this is enforced by katie (i.e. the package will be REJECTed) at JoeyH's specific request. BTW my reasoning behind that is it could get confusing if someone manages to install a ud

Bug#219528: Random root tmpfs filesystem size.

2003-11-26 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
I now realize this doesn't help, as some architectures still use linux 2.2, which doesn't have tmpfs. As a consequence we can't just use the "tmpfs" name and use options that don't apply everywhere. Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the plan was to move all archite

Bug#219528: Random root tmpfs filesystem size.

2003-11-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the > plan was to move all architectures to 2.4 for debian-installer. > > Because d-i uses devfs it is not trivial to support it on 2.2. I don't know, I was just

Re: (low priority) udeb naming

2003-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joey Hess schrieb: > > On 13 Dec 2000 I wrote: > > > > >>James Troup wrote: > >> > >>>You can't have a .udeb with the same name as a .deb; this is enforced > >>>by katie (i.e. the package will be REJECTed) at JoeyH's specific > >>>request. > >> > >>B

Re: Processed: tag pending d-i bugs

2003-11-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Jeremie Koenig] > I think i've read somewhere that the d-i tag wasn't supposed to be > used on d-i only packages. This seems wrong. Should we tag all d-i > bugs d-i when we sbumit them ? I use the d-i tag to list all d-i related bugs. For this to work, all such packages need the tag, including t

Bug#219528: Random root tmpfs filesystem size.

2003-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 01:22:07PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > > Which architecture still uses kernel 2.2 with d-i? I thought that the > > plan was to move all architectures to 2.4 for debian-installer. > > > > Because d-i uses devfs it is not tr

Re: Default bootloader

2003-11-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Geert Stappers] > Add missing serial line (detection) support to the list. Are you talking about the missing serial line support in grub-installer, or some feature of the grub boot loader? The first should be easily fixable. At least we use grub with serial console here at the university, and i

Tagging some bugs.

2003-11-26 Thread Jeremie Koenig
tags 219528 + d-i tags 219680 + d-i tags 219890 + d-i tags 219888 + d-i patch thanks On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:53:40PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I use the d-i tag to list all d-i related bugs. For this to work, all > such packages need the tag, including the d-i only packages. :) Ok,

Re: Default bootloader

2003-11-26 Thread Alastair McKinstry
>[Geert Stappers] >> Add missing serial line (detection) support to the list. > >Are you talking about the missing serial line support in >grub-installer, or some feature of the grub boot loader? The first >should be easily fixable. At least we use grub with serial console >here at the university

When will Yaboot 1.3.11 make it into the daily?

2003-11-26 Thread Barry C . Hawkins
List, Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated into the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan Benson's announcement (see below) on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's supposed to address issues specific to the PowerMac G5 and the aluminum PowerBook G4 series. Thank

Re: When will Yaboot 1.3.11 make it into the daily?

2003-11-26 Thread Thorsten Sauter
* Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]: | List, | Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated | into the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan Benson's | announcement (see below) on [EMAIL PROTECTED], it's | supposed to address i

Re: When will Yaboot 1.3.11 make it into the daily?

2003-11-26 Thread Barry C . Hawkins
On Nov 26, 2003, at 1:59 PM, Thorsten Sauter wrote: * Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]: | List, | Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated | into the daily snapshot of the installer? According to Ethan Benson's | announcement (see below) on [EMAIL

Re: When will Yaboot 1.3.11 make it into the daily?

2003-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Nov 26, 2003, at 1:59 PM, Thorsten Sauter wrote: > > > * Barry C.Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-24 20:09]: > > | List, > > | Is there any timeframe on when Yaboot 1.3.11 will be incorporated > > | into the daily snapshot of the installer?

Bug#222260: installation-reports: improper CDROM device symlinks

2003-11-26 Thread Jonathan Brandmeyer
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Attached report from template. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux illuvatar 2.4.22-1-686 #6 Sat Oct 4 14:09:08 EST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Package: installation-reports INST

Re: Default bootloader

2003-11-26 Thread Blars Blarson
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Network configuration:[ ] none [ ] dhcp [ ] static [ ] modem/dsl This seems to imply that all dsl uses the abomination of pppoe. I've got SDSL at home, and would need to choose static if I was installing on a directly connected

CDs not bootable when attempting to install sarge using new debian install

2003-11-26 Thread Jeffrey Barish
I am attempting to install sarge using the new debian installer according the directions at http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup Those directions describe how to install sarge using CDs made from a CD image available at htt

Re: Default bootloader

2003-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Blars Blarson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Network configuration:[ ] none [ ] dhcp [ ] static [ ] modem/dsl > > This seems to imply that all dsl uses the abomination of pppoe. I've Thats strange since the word doesn't eve

Re: CDs not bootable when attempting to install sarge using new debian install

2003-11-26 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jeffrey Barish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In every case, my machine gets to the point where it should boot from > CD, but it goes past it and boots either from fd (if one is installed) > or hd. The machine will boot from a knoppix CD, so the problem is not > in my BIOS settings. Any suggestio

Re: Portuguese translation of base system for the new debian installer

2003-11-26 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
There goes the attachment this time (i hope). Miguel On Friday 21 November 2003 13:20, you wrote: > * Miguel Figueiredo > > | I'm sendind you the file: > | /debian-installer/tools/base-installer/debian/po/ pt.pot > > It seems like you forgot to attach the file. Also, it's better if you > se

IMPORTANT - Bosnian "iso-scan" po FIXED!

2003-11-26 Thread sapphire
Hello, here is the second revision of iso-scan po file, bosnian translation. Please commit, Safir iso-scan_cvs.bs.zip Description: Zip compressed data

PB :page liste des paquets stables inaccessible

2003-11-26 Thread Patrice GUERPILLON
Bonjour, depuis plusieurs jours le lien vers la liste de paquets stables ne fonctonne plus. Amicalement, Patrice -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cd local build instructions?

2003-11-26 Thread Konstantinos Margaritis
On Tuesday 25 November 2003 15:50, you wrote: > You have to build all the udebs manually and put them into > build/localudebs. Even if you tell the build script to compile the > udebs (debug versions will do that) it will download the sources > from the archive and build those. Hi, I did manag