Ian Campbell, le Wed 11 May 2011 10:34:27 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit :
> > > We could maybe improve the wording to make it clearer than "Speech
> > > install". Maybe "Install with ^sp
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit :
> > > I've attached an example of what I plan to commit:
> >
> > That's an example, right? Only activating in amd64 GTK netboot is just
> > because this is an example, I gues
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> It does not fit the menu width, only "Install with speech synth" shows
> up. "^Speech synthesis install" can fit.
"Install with speech synth" has my preference, very slightly.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Christian PERRIER, le Wed 11 May 2011 07:41:58 +0200, a écrit :
> > I've attached an example of what I plan to commit:
>
> That's an example, right? Only activating in amd64 GTK netboot is just
> because this is an example, I guess.
Yes. I plan to do the same for cdrom/hd-media too and on i386 to
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Hello,
>
> Software speech synthesis is almost there in d-i. I'm just waiting for
> portaudio19 to fix a small bug, and then with rootskel and
> linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 uploads I'll be able to upload espeakup-udeb
> and make use of it in d-i.
>
>
Hello,
Software speech synthesis is almost there in d-i. I'm just waiting for
portaudio19 to fix a small bug, and then with rootskel and
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 uploads I'll be able to upload espeakup-udeb
and make use of it in d-i.
Now the question is: how to let the user select it?
I've attac
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
>> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
>>> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit :
>> Is static linking out of question?
> I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
>
Otavio Salvador, le Tue 17 Mar 2009 11:35:47 -0300, a écrit :
> >> Thus a total estimation of 2MB of udebs (7MB unpacked).
> >
> > So, does it seem reasonable?
>
> Yes, at least for me.
>
> However I'd prefer to keep it in graphical installer only.
Speakup modules are only enabled along the grap
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
>> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit :
>> > >> Is static linking out of question?
>> > >
>> > > I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
>> > > libportaudio and/o
Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit :
> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit :
> > >> Is static linking out of question?
> > >
> > > I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
> > > libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even sav
Hello,
Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit :
> >> Is static linking out of question?
> >
> > I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
> > libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space
> > than -Os builds.
>
> Could you take a loo
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Hello,
>
> Jérémy Bobbio, le Thu 05 Mar 2009 13:43:23 +0100, a écrit :
[...]
>> Is static linking out of question?
>
> I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with
> libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space
> than -Os build
Hello,
Jérémy Bobbio, le Thu 05 Mar 2009 13:43:23 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:16:05AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > and the latter depends on
> > - a libstdc++ udeb
> > - a libportaudio udeb
> > - a libasound udeb
> >
> > Does it sound reasonable to debian-boot and maintaine
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:16:05AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> I'm starting thinking about _software_ speech synthesis in d-i. A
> simple solution would be to use espeakup, which connects the espeak
> software speech synthesis to speakup. That would however depend on:
>
> - sound kernel modu
Hello,
I'm starting thinking about _software_ speech synthesis in d-i. A
simple solution would be to use espeakup, which connects the espeak
software speech synthesis to speakup. That would however depend on:
- sound kernel modules
- a libespeak udeb
and the latter depends on
- a libstdc++ ude
15 matches
Mail list logo