Hello, Jérémy Bobbio, le Thu 05 Mar 2009 13:43:23 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 02:16:05AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > and the latter depends on > > - a libstdc++ udeb > > - a libportaudio udeb > > - a libasound udeb > > > > Does it sound reasonable to debian-boot and maintainers of the > > corresponding packages? (I guess that will take a few MBs on the > > image...) > > It's a shame that there seems to be no other viable solutions. Having > C++ and PortAudio included in the installer really feels like an extra > burden to me.
Actually, looking a bit more at the libespeak library, it uses no libstdc++ symbol (shlibdeps warns about it), it's just a spurious -lstdc++... So that one could be dropped. I guess PortAudio is used just because it makes using either OSS or Alsa a lot either to achieve for espeak. > Is static linking out of question? I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space than -Os builds. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
