Otavio Salvador wrote: > Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> writes: > >> Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit : >>> Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit : >>>>>> Is static linking out of question? >>>>> I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with >>>>> libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space >>>>> than -Os builds. >>>> Could you take a look and check if it would be nice and how much space >>>> we'd use? >>> I tried to statically link espeakup against libespeak, libportaudio >>> and libasound; that produced a 500KB binary, which is indeed less than >>> what espeakup + libespeak.so + libportaudio.so + libasound.so would be >>> (1.2MB). The resulting udeb is 230KB. >>> >>> There also needs to be espeak-data-udeb.udeb, which is 500KB (1.5MB >>> unpacked), and sound modules, which are 1.2MB (5MB unpacked). >>> >>> Thus a total estimation of 2MB of udebs (7MB unpacked). >> So, does it seem reasonable? > > Yes, at least for me. > > However I'd prefer to keep it in graphical installer only. What others > think?
It seems reasonable to me, though I'm not up to speed with the exact size restrictions yet. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
