Samuel Thibault, le Sat 07 Mar 2009 01:21:20 +0100, a écrit : > Otavio Salvador, le Fri 06 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0300, a écrit : > > >> Is static linking out of question? > > > > > > I would be fine to see an espeak udeb statically linking with > > > libportaudio and/or libasound. That could even save more disk space > > > than -Os builds. > > > > Could you take a look and check if it would be nice and how much space > > we'd use? > > I tried to statically link espeakup against libespeak, libportaudio > and libasound; that produced a 500KB binary, which is indeed less than > what espeakup + libespeak.so + libportaudio.so + libasound.so would be > (1.2MB). The resulting udeb is 230KB. > > There also needs to be espeak-data-udeb.udeb, which is 500KB (1.5MB > unpacked), and sound modules, which are 1.2MB (5MB unpacked). > > Thus a total estimation of 2MB of udebs (7MB unpacked).
So, does it seem reasonable? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
