"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we could change the bf-archive install script a little, the amount of
> files uploaded could be significantly reduced without loosing anything.
> Currently we build [amiga|atari|mac|*vme*]install.tar.gz files so that
> potential users have
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 02:46:44PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Yes, it pulls from a archive. I don't know if woody cdrom images are
> around so I always pull from http.us.debian.org or whatever.
I haven't seen any woody images yet, especially not for m68k.
> Excellent to hear. Are you going
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I built a busybox with Richards patch, rebuilt bf (well, it hangup sometime,
> must be a local problem, but I got a new root.bin) and booting with the new
> root.bin works fine on my amiga. I did not get far in the installation
> (base.tar.gz
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Besides that m68k suffers from a busybox<->linux-2.2 incompatiblity, Richard
> > is working on a fix. I guess I may not tell more right now ;-)
>
> Huh, well, be sure to file bugs against busybox if needed.
I built a busybox with
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > ROOTCMD := $(shell [ d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo)
> > > Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed.
> >
> > Just replace the "sudo" part by
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:32:35AM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > ROOTCMD := $(shell [d -u = 0 ] || echo sudo)
> > Guess it will fail when I build as root, and no sudo is installed.
>
> Just replace the "sudo" part by whatever you use to achieve root
> (super should work too).
I
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it?
> >
> > If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please
> > make it very clear, perhaps
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:49:15PM -0400, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it?
> >
> > If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please
> > make it v
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 08:23:24PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it?
>
> If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please
> make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS].
I applied the subarch/system
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> > things going for their arc
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Someone is confusing Build-Depends syntax with Depends syntax there.
> You can't put arch-specifiers in a normal Depends line.
You're right, my bad. *blush* Seems to be fixed now anyhow.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>
Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My build runs for 519 minutes, then fails with:
>
> dh_builddeb -i
> dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' near line 6 package
>`boot-floppies':
> `Depends' field, syntax error after reference to package `zlib-bin'
> dh_builddeb:
Previously Richard Hirst wrote:
> So, I guess it is the [i386] it doesn't like. I'm guessing I need
> a newer dpkg, but I don't see a 1.9.8 for m68k yet. Can someone
> confirm that, before I chew up another 9hrs of cpu?
Someone is confusing Build-Depends syntax with Depends syntax there.
You ca
(-boot and -release?? -devel is more approriate)
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:50:25AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> Depends: [...] zlib-bin [i386], [...]
> So, I guess it is the [i386] it doesn't like.
"[i386]" and such is only permissable in *Build-Depends*. There's a bug in
the package.
Cheer
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
My build runs for 519 minutes, then fails with:
dh_gencontrol -i
dh_md5sums -i
dh_builddeb -i
dpkg-deb: parse error, in file `debian/tmp/DEBIAN/control' nea
Are you applying this patch or do you need someone to apply it?
If you are sending patches to this need that need applying, please
make it very clear, perhaps with subject of [APPLY PATCH PLS].
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Subarch and system are pretty screwy in the *.sh scripts. Don't think
it always is going to make sense. I hate to say it, but I tend to
just hack on it until it builds, trying to make sure not to break
anyone else.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:39:12PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> swapped? You mean when they are set? I guess this is the right patch:
Well, I came up with the following, but it does affect things other
than m68k so should not be applied without careful consideration.
OTOH, there where pl
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
>
> Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on
> $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with
> $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system
> for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carr
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 02:51:21PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on
> > $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with
> > $subarch='atari' and $system='
On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 08:54:39PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
>
> Anyway, so far I hit a problem with rescue.sh doing tests on
> $system for 'atari', etc, when rescue.sh has been invoked with
> $subarch='atari' and $system=''. For now I've swapped $system
> for $subarch in rescue.sh and am carr
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:09:11PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> > things g
Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:09:11PM -0500 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> >
> > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> > things going for their architectur
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This
> is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting
> things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an
> install system an
24 matches
Mail list logo
