"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 02:40:50PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > > > Nobody is working on m68k boot floppies for Woody at the moment. This > > is a bad situation. Unless m68k porters start working on getting > > things going for their architecture, won't that mean we don't have an > > install system and m68k will not be able to participate in the Woody > > release? > Which is more important, bf for potato or bf for woody? At this juncture I would say woody. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Wichert Akkerman
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo