(-boot and -release?? -devel is more approriate) On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 08:50:25AM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote: > Depends: [...] zlib-bin [i386], [...] > So, I guess it is the [i386] it doesn't like. "[i386]" and such is only permissable in *Build-Depends*. There's a bug in the package. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody David Whedon
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Wichert Akkerman
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies