Previously Richard Hirst wrote: > So, I guess it is the [i386] it doesn't like. I'm guessing I need > a newer dpkg, but I don't see a 1.9.8 for m68k yet. Can someone > confirm that, before I chew up another 9hrs of cpu? Someone is confusing Build-Depends syntax with Depends syntax there. You can't put arch-specifiers in a normal Depends line. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody David Whedon
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Richard Hirst
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Anthony Towns
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Wichert Akkerman
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Ethan Benson
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Christian T. Steigies
- Re: m68k boot-floppies for woody Adam Di Carlo