On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 09:49:22AM -0500, Jean Privat wrote:
>In the installer on the usbstick with upload3 in "UEFI Boot only
>(Without CSM)" mode:
>
# cat /sys/firmware/efi/fw_platform_size
>
>64
I was hoping (maybe?) that you might have got 32 there, implying that
the system wasn't booti
In the installer on the usbstick with upload3 in "UEFI Boot only
(Without CSM)" mode:
>>> # cat /sys/firmware/efi/fw_platform_size
64
You had my attention, but now you have my curiosity...
--
Jean PRIVAT, professeur/professor
Département d'informatique/Department of Computer Science
U.Q.A.M.
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:40:50PM -0500, Jean Privat wrote:
>> Yes, that sounds like the problem. You've ended up booting in BIOS
>> mode, so the installer can't do any EFI things at all. Roughly when
>> did you try this daily image? In the last month or so, or older than
>> that?
>
>last wednesda
> Yes, that sounds like the problem. You've ended up booting in BIOS
> mode, so the installer can't do any EFI things at all. Roughly when
> did you try this daily image? In the last month or so, or older than
> that?
last wednesday if I remember correctly. so 2015-01-07
>>* Seeing that the insta
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:35:30AM -0500, Jean Privat wrote:
>> Hmmm, sounds like a BIOS/firmware bug if you need to add that custom
>> boot method - UEFI boot option registration should work without
>> that.
>
>After the install, the computer booted to windows. Using the bios
>bootmenu (F9) the de
> Hmmm, sounds like a BIOS/firmware bug if you need to add that custom
> boot method - UEFI boot option registration should work without
> that.
After the install, the computer booted to windows.
Using the bios bootmenu (F9) the default option is "OS Boot Manager"
that boots windows.
But "debian"
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 04:05:15PM -0500, Jean Privat wrote:
>Hi,
Hi Jean,
>I just received a new laptop so naturally I installed Debian on it.
*grin* Of course!
>My steps:
>
>* on the elitebook, update the bios firmware trough the bios setup
>* on an other computer, dd the image from
>http://c
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 19:57 +, digital fredy wrote:
> 4 put rescue mode for recover the system
I would like to see a small DFS (Debian From Scratch) Live-CD on the
same disc as d-i, so that it can be dual-booted to either the installer
or a rescue CD. Or, perhaps the rescue system could have
> Well, here are some more settings--perhaps they may help you track down
> the problem:
After running exactly this setup in VmWare, I finally ended with
"date" showing a time in EDT timezone.
and /etc/localtime was properly linked to /usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada/Eastern
So, I'm afraid investiga
Christian,
I'm not sure what to say to the fact that you can't reproduce it.
Well, here are some more settings--perhaps they may help you track down
the problem:
Base System Install
-
language setting:
- en (other countries) english
Country:
- Canada
Kernel:
Quoting Michael Bonert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Debian-installer-version:
>
> 22 June 2004
>
> $ md5sum sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> 5db3c8d500380d664c748356910a6d2e sarge-i386-netinst.iso
For the record, this is 20040622 sid_d-i
> There appears to be some pro
ST)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:44:21 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FWD: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol=&q
On 27.V.2004 at 13:55 (+0200) Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> Then partition objects in memory should probably be initialized as
> having no fs on them, instead of looking up the disk.
This is exactly what the newer versions of partman do.
> Or, maybe better, they could be initialized from disk only if
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 02:17:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03
> > snapshot)...
>
> This is very old now can you please try a new image from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that
> works b
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: INSTALL REPORT
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 20:56:10 +0200
To: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_REA
> As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03
> snapshot)...
This is very old now can you please try a new image from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and see if that
works better?
> - I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 231003 + help
Bug#231003: Should include IPv6 support from the beginning
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > After reboot (to second-stage), I don't see (czech) accented
> > characters, but some other symbols (like percent, box, average mark,
> > ...) instead of š,č,ř... Some texts a
Eric Bus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
| I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
| LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
| give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
| kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686' (or change 686 to another arch if
Eric Bus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
| I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
| LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
| give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
| kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686' (or change 686 to another arch if
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:03:31PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > After reboot (to second-stage), I don't see (czech) accented
> > characters, but some other symbols (like percent, box, average mark,
> > ...) instead of š,č,ř... Some texts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At 9 Feb 04 11:03:31 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > After reboot (to second-stage), I don't see (czech) accented
> > characters, but some other symbols (like percent, box, average mark,
> > ...) instead of ~,~,~... Some texts are not localize
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Dear list.
>
> I am trying new Debian installer (sid_d-i sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> from 5.2.2004). I choose installation in czech, everything goes ok,
> but labels in cfdisk are showing only to the first accented character
> and then disappear.
Ye
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:51:09 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:49AM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
>> saying: "modprobe -k ini9100u" . /lib/modules of the initrd
>> does not contain any file with this name, but there is initio.o,
>> and also all other moules loaded in 'loa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
| Everyone is running into this missing kernel thing. Can someone get a
| debug trace of base-installer/apt-install and find out why it's
| failing to install the kernel?
The machine I used to test the floppy installer will be re-insta
Everyone is running into this missing kernel thing. Can someone get a
debug trace of base-installer/apt-install and find out why it's failing
to install the kernel?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Eric Bus wrote:
> I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
> LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
> give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
> kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686' (or change 686 to another arch if you'r
Well - I trried that as well but I'm not clever enough to do it without
dpkg-.
I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686' (
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Eric Bus wrote:
> I have the same problem with d-i images from 20040131 and up. But I can
> install the kernel from tty2. I have no idea why it skips it during
> base-system-installation.
Well - I trried that as well but I'm not clever enough to do it without
dpkg-. I tried t
I tried d-i image from today (6.2.2004) and noticed that grub and lilo
installation failed. The reason is that there was no kernel on the
/target at all. When I looked at the apt cache there was no kernel-image*
package avialable.
I have the same problem with d-i images from 20040131 and up. But
Here is what's going on. cdrom-detect fails to configure as it cannot
find the drive. The user selects anna from the main menu. Anna depends
on retriever, a virtual package provided by floppy-retriever, and
cdrom-retriever. main-menu needs to configure at least one of these to
continue, and it choo
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:49AM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Booting Knoppix and having a look at the hard disk does not reveal
> anything suspicious (to me), maybe with one exception:
> when I mount the /boot/initrd.img-xxx from the hard disk, it
> contains a file 'loadmodules' with, amon
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 11:34:21PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Funny, I'd run into this same problem 94 days ago, and I filed a bug
> then, but forgot about it. This is bug #218774 (main-menu).
>
> I'm tempted to "fix" this bug by putting load-cdrom and load-floppy[1] on
> the CDROM, dropping load-i
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:51:08 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> >> Sorry, there is no little menu after hardware detection. I immediately
> >> get the screen titled "[!!] Detecting hardware and loading kernel modules"
> >> that says "Your installation CD-ROM couldn't be mounted.
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:51:08 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Sorry, there is no little menu after hardware detection. I immediately
>> get the screen titled "[!!] Detecting hardware and loading kernel modules"
>> that says "Your installation CD-ROM couldn't be mounted.This probably...
>> ...Try again t
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Well, not only the docs, the floppy images I downloaded from links on
> the D-I homepage two days ago contain modules for version 2.4.22,
> whereas 2.4.24 is needed.
The prominant links on the d-i home page are prominantly marked as being
for for beta2 of the debian ins
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:11:39 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>Herbert Kaminski wrote:
>> trying to install sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
>> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/i386/20040131/
>> on a pure SCSI drives me crazy :-]
>
>What scsi controller please? d-i's CD knows about sever
Erik Dykema wrote:
> OK, I think i get it, thanks! I was attempting to install the
> 'testing' distribution, that must be why it didn't work.
> So the 'fix' for this is to get the 2.4.24 kernel into testing.
> OR, to build a 'testing' version of d-i.
Yes, I may see about gettin
Hi-
OK, I think i get it, thanks! I was attempting to install the
'testing' distribution, that must be why it didn't work.
So the 'fix' for this is to get the 2.4.24 kernel into testing.
OR, to build a 'testing' version of d-i.
As a side note, I have a question regarding why the netboot imag
Erik Dykema wrote:
> Everything seems to boot up fine, but the kernel fails to detect the
> adaptec scsi controller, so the installer gets to the 'Partition Hard
> Drives' part without any warning and then won't go any further. There
> is no error message suggesting that hard drives were not de
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> trying to install sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/i386/20040131/
> on a pure SCSI drives me crazy :-]
What scsi controller please? d-i's CD knows about several common
controllers, but the less common ones do still re
Matt Kraai wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> Thanks for testing Debian-Installer.
>
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:23:06PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote:
> > The base system would not install. It says it could not download
> > the package "libgcrypt7." I tried both normal and expert installs, I
> > also tried
Herbert Kaminski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> trying to install sarge-i386-netinst.iso from
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/i386/20040131/
> on a pure SCSI drives me crazy :-]
>
> First, the CD does not boot with standard settings, where KNOPPIX
> boots easily.
What is the error
Howdy,
Thanks for testing Debian-Installer.
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 05:23:06PM -0600, Nicholas Williams wrote:
> The base system would not install. It says it could not download
> the package "libgcrypt7." I tried both normal and expert installs, I
> also tried configuring the network settings
> "Erik" == Erik Dykema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Erik> INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Feb 3nd Daily,
Erik> from: http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
Erik> Comments: I am booting with vmlinuz / netboot-initrd.gz from
Erik> ~sjogren:
Erik> http:/
Erik Dykema wrote:
> Everything worked great, with one exception:
> I setup APT with an http source from my local mirror. Afterwards, it
> went back to the apt setup screen and didn't say 'You've setup one
> apt-source, want to setup another?' or anything like that, I had to hit
> cancel to kic
Hi-
I was / am using the daily builds here:
http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/images/daily/
I just download the kernel and initrd as I am using pxelinux to boot
everything off the network. Are these images no longer maintained / fixed?
Erik
Joey Hess wrote:
Erik Dykema wrote:
I
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:09:33AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
> However in the past few days the installer has failed to detect the
> scsi card in my machine, which seems to be a big step backwards.
> It's a Dell PowerApp Web 100 1U server. The installer stops on the
> 'Partition Hard
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:41:51 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: INSTALL REPORT with 2004-01-09 netinst, failed
As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03
snapshot)...
- I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a
previou
Erik Dykema wrote:
> I have been testing the daily builds almost every weekday since at
> least december, so far progress has continued to the point where i can
> get almost all the way through the installer :)
> However in the past few days the installer has failed to detect the
> s
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> severity 226742 grave
Thanks for adjusting this and sharing my opinion.
BTW, I had the same observation that in the first install process
the keyboard was adjusted fine and after the reboot changing the
keymap failed.
Kind regards
Andreas
severity 226742 grave
thanks
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:31:53PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 Christian Perrier wrote:
> > This is a known console-data bug...not BTS available to me currently
> > but it is easy to find.
> Yes, I found it immediately after my posting to this li
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Well, we have a tool for translators for checking unstranslated stuff,
> but there are some cases where, even if the string is translated, the
> translations is not shown by debconf. So, this is why you may be asked
> about what you found.
I hereby p
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
> > > screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
> >
> > Which one?
> Damn - I forgot it because I've thought there would be a tool
> which shows untranslated stu
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 Christian Perrier wrote:
> This is a known console-data bug...not BTS available to me currently
> but it is easy to find.
Yes, I found it immediately after my posting to this list: #226742.
The problem is that I think it should be of RC priority if we would
not like to leave a
> > I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
> > screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
>
> Which one?
Damn - I forgot it because I've thought there would be a tool
which shows untranslated stuff, but it's no problem I'll do
a further install in th
Quoth Thorsten Sauter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Michael Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-14 19:30]:
>| Booting from image didn't work, like all other images I tried before.
>
> why not? It's working fine for me.
I just checked an image yesterday and it boots. The image I tested
before, built on 09.
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Joey Hess wrote:
> Please file a bug report on console-data.
I checked this immediately after sending my first mail and found
#226742. I added my observation and the opinion that Severity
"normal" is to low in this case. I'm not an installer expert but
from a installer point
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I would prefer to always offer security.d.o (and default to yes)
> regardless of what distro is being installed. For one thing, users may
> install from the beta while sarge==testing, and want to use security
> updates afterwards once it becomes stable
* Michael Rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-14 19:30]:
| Booting from image didn't work, like all other images I tried before.
why not? It's working fine for me.
| Is http://people.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/netinst/powerpc/daily/
| the right place to get official daily builds? If so I'll
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 12:01:50PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> at first thanks for all your fine work at d-i. I never installed a Debian
> box so easy and so fast as with
>
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/daily/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
> (downloaded today size = 3
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I tried the German installation and I think I found only one not yet translated
> screen - so thanks to all the translators as well.
Which one?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Quoting Andreas Tille ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> 2. A more serious problem is that the keymap was not set correctly.
> I verified this by
> dpkg-reconfigure console-data
> (selected: qwertz / German / Standard / latin1 - no dead keys)
> and got the following stderr output:
Andreas Tille wrote:
> 1. I selected "testing" as distribution. In this case it makes no sense
> to include security.debian.org into source.list. I would include a
> check here whether the distribution is stable and if not security
> should be left out here.
The installer does ma
> 2. A more serious problem is that the keymap was not set correctly.
> I verified this by
> dpkg-reconfigure console-data
> (selected: qwertz / German / Standard / latin1 - no dead keys)
> and got the following stderr output:
>
> Looking for keymap to install:
>
Yann Dirson wrote:
> I could find nothing obviously alarming on this subject in syslog,
> although there are many "broken dependency" reported all around. I
> saved the syslog through nc (hopefully installed by a previous run on
> the target HD, kudos to you for having put it here ;)
nc is not in
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:40:07PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
> > - in the list of country to select mirrors from (and possibly other
> > lists), when using french as a language, the coutries are not sorted
> > according to their translation, but appear to be sorted by their
> > english
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I won't anwser to all of these. Only those I have a kind of answer or
something to add.
> BTW, is it wise at all to use devfs, which is tagged as OBSOLETE in 2.6 !?
I have the same objection. This breaks out from woody AND from next
release.
The argumen
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> - in the step where one assigns fstype/mountpoints to partitions, when
> one selects a swap partition, and just validates current choice for
> fstype, the swap partiton is assigned a mountpoint matching the last
> mountpoint assigned (eg. "/", which then
As I attempt to do more not-so-uncommon things (with the 2004-01-03
snapshot)...
- I initially have a HD with a single ext3 partition + swap (from a
previous RH install). If I repartition by deleting the ext3 and
repartitionning that space in 2, on the partition setup screen I
notice the 1st part
Quoting Yann Dirson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> - the items in the initial language menu all start with "choose this"
> or a translation of it, which makes it impossible to quickly jump to a
> particular language with one keystroke, as was possible in old
> installer
I've proposed a new prospective la
Ah, I forgot to fill some boxes
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote:
> Memory: 192MB
> Root Size/partition table: single ~9GB root, 512M swap
And to mention yet other problems:
- the items in the initial language menu all start with "choose this"
or a translation of it, which
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:46:01PM +0100, ydirson wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
>
> Partition hard drives:
>
> if I just follow the steps lineraly, no problem. At first, I had hit
> cancel at some point before (have to check and reproduce), and the HD
> selection menu was incomplete (did not menti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fredag 9. januar 2004, 17:35, skrev Erik Dykema:
> Comments/Problems:
> 1. Everything seems to install fine excepting the kernel. The red
> screen comes up and says that the kernel failed. I hit alt-f3 to see
> what happened, and find the following:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:14:34PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
> >> Things that seem curious:
> >> Why is mkinitd caring about my hardware devices, doesn't it just
> >>need to see the files in /target?
> >mkinitrd needs to build an initrd that will be able to find the real
> >root device after
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:35:23AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
> This is my third install report, apoligies for errors, welcome
> correction. It is similar but more complete (due to the busybox bug
> being fixed) than yesterday's with the same kernel install problem.
> Is there an outs
Things that seem curious:
Why is mkinitd caring about my hardware devices, doesn't it just
need to see the files in /target?
mkinitrd needs to build an initrd that will be able to find the real
root device after booting. If /target/dev/cciss doesn't exist, mkinitrd
has nothing to work fro
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:06:59PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
> 2. On attempting to install the base system, it says that it is
> retrieving package files, then finding package sizes, then retrieving
> packages, validating, extracting packages. Then the screen goes blue
> for a bit with no menu
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:45:02PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So, I figured I'd give this image another go after pulling the SCSI
> controller out of the machine. The SCSI card happens to be an
> integrated SCSI/ethernet device, so there was definitely no network
> configuration happening on
I know why it worked 10 days ago when I installed. I was following someone
else's install instructions at:
http://www.pcc-services.com/debian_install.html
Thanks Sebastien and Steve for the help and fix.
- Daniel
Sebastien Bacher wrote:
The problem is than tasksel install gnome-core (the meta
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ah, I hadn't thought of that. I'm not sure how this is handled for
> other non-default filesystem types. I'll take a look at getting
> xfsprogs installed by default in such a case.
The reiserfs thing is really a hack, it's better if the mkfs.* programs
in the udebs be mod
Hi Erich,
On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 07:24:59PM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
> I have successfully installed a xfs based system. Details see
> below. I was very pleased with the installer image! Thanks!
Glad to hear it!
> Initial boot worked:[O]
> Configure network HW: [O]
> Config network:
Christian Perrier wrote:
> The screen is occasionnaly not cleaned up before the main menu pops up
> again : for instance, when running prebaseconfig, getting an error
> because of network problems while trying to fetch the Release
> file.the "Retrieving" window remained behind the main menu whe
Daniel Cardenas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to vorlon on irc, the install code contains no Gnome code,
> so this is an upstream problem.
> Tried "apt-get install gnome-session", after apt-get different errors
> were received. Seems like very little of the gnome system was
> installed.
On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Daniel Cardenas wrote:
> According to vorlon on irc, the install code contains no Gnome code, so
> this is an upstream problem.
I didn't mean to suggest that this was an upstream problem, only that it
wasn't an installer problem. This may well be a bug i
According to vorlon on irc, the install code contains no Gnome code, so this is
an upstream problem.
Tried "apt-get install gnome-session", after apt-get different errors were
received. Seems like very little of the gnome system was installed.
Daniel Cardenas wrote:
I have the same or similar i
I have the same or similar issue with the Jan 2nd build. KDE seems to work fine.
Gnome error:
could not find /usr/bin/gnome-session
If I try to run failsafe gnome, I get an error that says the Gnome installation
could not be found.
I used ReiserFS.
I'm some what new to Linux this so pardon the la
Joey Hess wrote:
> base-config priority is still screwed up (foiled again!).
Which is just weird. I did 2 installs to my test laptop, one of the same
netinst, one of the jan 2 businesscard, and both got the base-config
priority right. In vmware, it was medium, and that was a non-default
value in q
Hi Joey,
thanks for your "cannot reproduce".
It seems that powering off my test box makes a difference.
I also suspect that my CD-RW is no good any more and chose to use a new
one. With that most of the problems mentioned before (below) vanish.
And since there is a new image, I'll send in a se
Erich Waelde wrote:
> Debian-installer-version:
> 30-Dec-2003 11:11h netinst.iso 2nd build from
> http://people.debian.org/~manty/testing/netinst/i386/daily/
>
> just to be sure:
> md5sum sarge-i386-netinst-20031230.2.iso
> 8d88a368fc2225144b8592d75684 sarg
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> gives me acces to the repository (I am zinoviev AT debian org) I will be
> able to add partman to the official repository.
I've added you, it might take up to an hour for the change to take
effect and you'll need to request a "missing password" on alioth if you
have not alr
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> What's the status of partman? Is that available for testing already?
The packages can be used and finally there is support for i18n. I am
going to have better connection to Internet on 6 Jan 2004. On this date
I will put the packages on http://lm
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-28 00:40]:
> cfdisk can not handle partition tables where the order of the logical
[...]
What's the status of partman? Is that available for testing already?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Manually HDD partitioning didn't work. cfdisk quit's with an
> error. Used automatic partitioning.
cfdisk can not handle partition tables where the order of the logical
partitions in the disk does not follow their numbers. For example when
/dev/hda6 is phisi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 224996 Cannot install initrd-tools, UHCI problems
Bug#224996: INSTALL REPORT
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Joey Hess wrote:
Robert wrote:
Manually HDD partitioning didn't work. cfdisk quit's with an error. Used
automatic partitioning.
Any chance you can tell us what the error wis?
Hmmm... I'am sorry but I can't remember the error message exactly. I
know - not a very useful answer... As fa
Robert wrote:
> Manually HDD partitioning didn't work. cfdisk quit's with an error. Used
> automatic partitioning.
Any chance you can tell us what the error wis?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jukka Neppius wrote:
> > 1. No documents! The page
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ has a promising link to
> > "The Debian-Installer's INSTALLATION HOWTO". Unfortunately it does
> > not give anything.
>
> I think you'll find that link is
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jukka Neppius wrote:
> > 1. No documents! The page
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ has a promising link to
> > "The Debian-Installer's INSTALLATION HOWTO". Unfortunately it does
> > not give anything.
>
> I think you'll find that link is
Jukka Neppius wrote:
> 1. No documents! The page
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ has a promising link to
> "The Debian-Installer's INSTALLATION HOWTO". Unfortunately it does
> not give anything.
I think you'll find that link is working now. We're still in the process
of restoring
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
