Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Even though there are different locale variants available for historical
> reasons, I think there is no reason we need to support more than one
> variant for each locale in new installs. So a simple mapping list in
> countrychooser should be sufficien
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 07:12:27AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > But generated locales differ because different encodings are passed to
> > localedef:
> > $ LANG=fr_FR locale charmap
> > ISO-8859-1
> > $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale charmap
> >
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> But generated locales differ because different encodings are passed to
> localedef:
> $ LANG=fr_FR locale charmap
> ISO-8859-1
> $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale charmap
> ISO-8859-15
>
> Steve mentions in another message that switching fr_FR encodin
IL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: @euro support with new languagechooser (was: dropping tc1)
>
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> (comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] more generally all @euro
> variants of locales)
>
> > So there&#
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] more generally all @euro
> variants of locales)
> > So there's no difference in the actual charset that each is pointed to,
> > the only differ
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
(comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] more generally all @euro
variants of locales)
> So there's no difference in the actual charset that each is pointed to,
> the only difference is in a comment about the charset?
Yes, as far as I understand. [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 June 2004 17:20, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So there's no difference in the actual charset that each is pointed to,
> the only difference is in a comment about the charset?
Well, the line definitely is a comment. I don't see a reference to a
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:40:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 21 June 2004 16:06, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] basically is a copy of fr_FR:-)
> Hmm yes, I see what you mean.
> The same goes for nl_NL and nl_BE (and for de_LU and es_ES which I checked at
> random).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 21 June 2004 16:06, Christian Perrier wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] basically is a copy of fr_FR:-)
Hmm yes, I see what you mean.
The same goes for nl_NL and nl_BE (and for de_LU and es_ES which I checked at
random). There's really only th
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there some table available that lists primary currency for a country?
Not afaik
Funnily, I indeed begin to wonder whether we still need these "@euro"
variants.
When comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] I only see the comment about
Charset to be d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 06:46, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Maybe one issue: I now get LANG=nl_NL in /etc/environment; I think this
> > used to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]; was that changed ??
>
> The way the locale is
11 matches
Mail list logo
