On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:45:21PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> (comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] more generally all @euro > variants of locales) > > So there's no difference in the actual charset that each is pointed to, > > the only difference is in a comment about the charset? > Yes, as far as I understand. [EMAIL PROTECTED] only uses > copy "fr_FR" > everywhere.... > While fr_FR LC_MONETARY section refers to the Euro currency....which > is logical in 2004..:-) > same for nl_NL and all [EMAIL PROTECTED] locales > I guess @euro variants were basically transition variants. They are > now useless.....except that many users still continue to use them > pointlessly. > This is my understanding of all these things, of course. Well, the ISO-8859-15 charset contains a codepoint for the euro symbol, and the ISO-8859-1 charset does not, so as long as fr_FR maps to ISO-8859-1, it cannot support the euro; and changing it to point to ISO-8859-15 is probably something that needs to be discussed. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
