On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:46:25PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > (I announced a CC and forgot to really do it) > > ----- Forwarded message from Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- > > Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:45:21 +0200 > From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: @euro support with new languagechooser (was: dropping tc1) > > Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > (comparing fr_FR and [EMAIL PROTECTED] more generally all @euro > variants of locales) > > > So there's no difference in the actual charset that each is pointed to, > > the only difference is in a comment about the charset? > > Yes, as far as I understand. [EMAIL PROTECTED] only uses > > copy "fr_FR" > > everywhere....
But generated locales differ because different encodings are passed to localedef: $ LANG=fr_FR locale charmap ISO-8859-1 $ [EMAIL PROTECTED] locale charmap ISO-8859-15 Steve mentions in another message that switching fr_FR encoding to ISO-8859-15 cannot be done without discussion, but glibc upstream has a definitive position: encodings are never changed, period. (It recently surfaces again about et_EE) So this discussion is over before it begins ;) Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
