Bug#1106506: unblock: apt/3.0.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:apt User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package apt [ Reason ] Downgrade the modernize-sources notice to an audit

Bug#1032131: deb822-style sources.list

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 01:09:21AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Julian Andres Klode (2025-01-21): > > Roland Clobus schrieb am Di., 21. Jan. 2025, 23:11: > > > The new version of apt (2.9.24) will now cause a FTBFS for the daily > > > d-i. This has been noticed al

Bug#1032131: deb822-style sources.list

Sorry for the phone reply but Roland Clobus schrieb am Di., 21. Jan. 2025, 23:11: > Hello Julian, > > On 21/01/2025 15:43, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > >> This has been sitting for almost 2 years again; the style of sources > >> apt-setup generate now triggers

Bug#1032131: deb822-style sources.list

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:50:36PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:43:22PM +0100, David Prévot wrote: > > Source: apt-setup > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for m

Bug#1032131: deb822-style sources.list

Control: severity -1 important On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:43:22PM +0100, David Prévot wrote: > Source: apt-setup > Severity: wishlist > > Hi, > > Thank you for maintaining d-i! > > I may be late to the bookworm party but… It would be nice if d-i could > provide deb822-style sources.list (by def

Bug#1091200: override: gpgv:utils/optional

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: gnu...@packages.debian.org, debian-boot@lists.debian.org, juli...@ubuntu.com Control: affects -1 + src:gnupg2 User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: override The gpgv tool is no longer used by apt as of the 2.9.19 upload. It is th

Bug#1087524: cdebconf: Move to /usr/lib/apt/apt-extracttemplates

Source: cdebconf Version: 0.272 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org APT 2.9.11 moves the apt-extracttemplates program from /usr/bin to /usr/lib/apt (apt's libexec directory) as part of moving it to the main `apt` package, where it can now be utilized by every installation without need

Bug#1032131: deb822-style sources.list

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 07:00:57PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > David Prévot (2023-02-28): > > I may be late to the bookworm party but… It would be nice if d-i could > > provide deb822-style sources.list (by default) for newly installed > > machines. > > This seems late indeed. Hiya,

Re: Bug#1054644: xfsprogs-udeb: causes D-I to fail, reporting errors about missing partition devices

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 04:33:36PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Julian Andres Klode (2023-12-25): > > The final grub 2.12 that includes the fix should hit unstable in the > > middle of January. As you might be aware many are busy with family > > stuff and holiday c

Re: Bug#1054644: xfsprogs-udeb: causes D-I to fail, reporting errors about missing partition devices

Control: tag 1059424 patch (switching to the cloned xfsprogs bug) On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 09:15:59AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Control: clone -1 -2 > Control: reassign -2 xfsprogs > > On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: Bug#1054644: xfsprogs-udeb: causes D-I to fail, reporting errors about missing partition devices

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 xfsprogs On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:11:53PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi, > > Anthony Iliopoulos (2023-10-30): > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 04:19:32PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > > > Anthony Iliopoulos writes: > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 a

Re: Bug#1040901: Upcoming changes to Debian Linux kernel packages

OK, it seems my original email got lost somewhere in tech hickups, it's possible the kernel crashed before sending the email, AMD just crashes once or twice a day. So I'm writing this email a bit in a hurry, so it's not quite as thought out as the last one weeks ago, but yesterday's email was pre

Bug#1033686: installation-reports: non-bootable install due to no UEFI entries

g x86 machines. On Thu, Mar 30 2023 at 03:40:00 AM -04:00:00, Andres Salomon wrote: Oh duh, the nvram is on the board itself, not on the disk drive. Okay, that makes more sense. The machine itself came with windows, and then I had a different drive in it with Debian on it. Originally lega

Re: Bug#1033686: installation-reports: non-bootable install due to no UEFI entries

[I'm manually sending the bug report since it never made it to the list due to attachment size. See the BTS to view attachments: https://bugs.debian.org/1033686 ] Package: installation-reports Boot method: usb stick Image version: March 26 2023 image (https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-

Bug#1033688: installation-reports: full-disk encryption partitioning takes way too long

This didn't make it to the list due to attachment size. For attachments, see https://bugs.debian.org/1033688 On Thu, Mar 30 2023 at 02:36:48 AM -04:00:00, Andres Salomon wrote: Package: installation-reports Boot method: usb stick Image version: March 26 2023 image (

Bug#1033686: installation-reports: non-bootable install due to no UEFI entries

Oh duh, the nvram is on the board itself, not on the disk drive. Okay, that makes more sense. The machine itself came with windows, and then I had a different drive in it with Debian on it. Originally legacy mode, at some point I switched to EFI and used both shimx64.efi and grubx64.efi at alte

Bug#1033686: installation-reports: non-bootable install due to no UEFI entries

I was asked in #debian-boot for the output of efibootmgr -v: BootCurrent: 0007 Timeout: 0 seconds BootOrder: 0001,0002,0003,0004,0005,0007 Boot* ubuntu HD(1,GPT,54fdc960-7b34-4ff5-a95f-83dd7a4d6ab3,0x800,0x10)/File(\EFI\ubuntu\shimx64.efi) Boot0001* Diskette DriveBBS(Floppy,Dis

Re: Firmware GR result - what happens next?

On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 12:26:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:53:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > >What's the plan for upgraded systems with an existing > > >/etc/apt/sources.list. > > >Will the new n-f-f section added on upgrades automatically(if non-free was >

Bug#981643: debootstrap: variant=buildd: Drop apt.conf.d snippet to set APT::Get::Always-Include-Phased-Updates to true

Control: user de...@lists.debian.org Control: usertag -1 phased-updates Control: clone -1 -2 -3 Control: reassign -1 sbuild Control: reassign -2 pbuilder Control: reassign -3 autopkgtest On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:09:35PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Severity:

Bug#981643: debootstrap: variant=buildd: Drop apt.conf.d snippet to set APT::Get::Always-Include-Phased-Updates to true

Package: debootstrap Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@debian.org Control: affects -1 sbuild Control: affects -1 ubuntu-dev-tools APT recently introduced support for phased updates, and added some hacks to disable them in chroots to avoid breaking builders. As this is somewhat strange to behave

Bug#930428: debootstrap should ensure matching _apt uid

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:47:08PM +0200, Michael Schaller wrote: > Looks like there is no reply from the Apt maintainers. Should I open a > bug against apt? The _apt user is used in stable, and various Ubuntu LTS, and so far, nobody cared about us creating it dynamically. So this is not a matter

Re: APT Date verification

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Hey guys, > > APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release > file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implications > for installing on devices with an inaccurate clock, as t

Re: APT Date verification

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 09:05:50PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Hey guys, > > > > APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release > > file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implica

Re: APT Date verification

On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:25:16PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 03:07:54PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > It's a bit unclear if this only affects validation of the Date field, > > or also turns off Validation of the Valid-Until field (as a gener

APT Date verification

Hey guys, APT will shortly start validating that the Date field in a release file is not (too far) in the future. This might have implications for installing on devices with an inaccurate clock, as they might now fail. There are two primary workarounds: * Set Acquire::Check-Date to false * Set c

Bug#879755: debootstrap fails with current sid without apt-transport-https and https URLs

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:24:51PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > The other half of the point is that sid is symlinked to various suites, > so when we fix debootstrap we'd have a script divergence for the coming > release. It would make most sense to just download the rest of the packages first and

Bug#879755: debootstrap fails with current sid without apt-transport-https and https URLs

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 09:40:00PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > [ +jak +deity ] > > On 2017-10-25 12:38, Petr Cech wrote: > > apt 1.6~alpha removed binary package apt-transport-https and therefor > > debootstrap with a https URL fails with dependency error: > > > > I: Checking component main on h

Re: Bug#879662: apt: debian-installer FTBFS: E: Method copy has died unexpectedly!

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 07:48:52AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Package: apt > Version: 1.4.8 I assume you mean 1.6~alpha1? Because that's what the error seems to indicate. > Severity: serious > Tags: d-i > Justification: FTBFS > > [ Please keep both debian-boot@ and me in copy. ] > > It see

Re: Bug#873465: apt: wrongly reports failure on 'update' on mips64el, triggers d-i FTBFS

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 07:50:34AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Control: tag -1 patch > > Cyril Brulebois (2017-08-28): > > Given apt 1.5~beta2 was uploaded on the evening of the 17th, it probably > > reached the archive on the 18th, and was first used in the build chroot > > for the 0030Z bui

Bug#851774: Stop using apt-key add to add keys in generators/60local

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 03:57:19PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote: > [Adding deity@l.d.o into the loop] > > On 18.01.2017 17:43, Marga Manterola wrote: > > For a long time it's been possible to preseed a local repository that > > has it's own keyring. However, with the latest changes related to gpg > >

Re: Should apt-transport-https be Priority: Important ? (Asking to APT maintainers)

On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:27:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Dear APT maintainers, > > while discussing the package contents of Debian cloud instances, the question > arose if it would make sense to install apt-https-transport on most Debian > systems, by setting its priority to "Important".

Re: Cloud images with backports APT-enabled.

all any package from backports at all (/me looks at gnome-software). So I'm not sure I want a technical solution. (1) breaks stuff and use cases and (2) gives us some assurance, but only for APT and not for dumb frontends. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http:

Re: Bug#765458: apt: broken cdrom support, breaking installation from weekly ISO images

drom code is when installing, and then never again. It's a sad state to be in. It would be a good idea to improve the testing of optical media, but I'm not really sure if that's possible. Possibly with virtual machines? -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See

Bug#763695: console-setup is slowest part of boot, not fast as setupcon manpage tells us

7: 8x16 debian-installer/console-setup-udeb/title: * keyboard-configuration/store_defaults_in_debconf_db: true * keyboard-configuration/layout: * keyboard-configuration/modelcode: pc105 * keyboard-configuration/xkb-keymap: de -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http

Bug#733049: debian-installer does NOT add bootable flag in guided partitioning mode

> Isn't this flag supposed to be more or less decorative these days? > > (IOW: what's your particular setup, why does it need this flag?) I'm always working with old computers. They don't have a separate EFI partition (most of them can't handle it anyways) and usually I choose to install GRUB in t

Bug#733049: debian-installer does NOT add bootable flag in guided partitioning mode

Package: debian-installer Version: 20130613+deb7u1+b1 Severity: normal Tags: d-i Since version 7.0 of wheezy, the debian installer has had this problem. The debian installer in guided partitioning mode does NOT automatically add the bootable flag to the appropriate partition. This can result in

Re: flash-kernel: Recent Android commits (by lool) break things

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 03:03:03PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Hi, > > The following commits have been made in the flash-kernel repository > (a) 8436937e3c7470cfac1c4a44c8c4c796c10712fe Don't scan for Android boot; add > to machine-db > (b) c5e08d6036237e306

flash-kernel: Recent Android commits (by lool) break things

s, a comment split in two lines and other lines getting longer than the whole comment on one line), but those are only stylistic changes, and do not break actively used functionality, and can be discussed later. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.

Bug#629695: debian-installer: testing snapshot 6/6/11 fails to install

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Andres Cimmarusti wrote: >> We need the installation logs. You'll find them in /var/log/syslog >> while installing, or in /var/log/installer on the installed system. > > I used a live cd to boot up my laptop (after an aborted failed > inst

Bug#631396: [PATCH] flash-kernel: Add support for Toshiba AC100

d. Signed-off-by: Julian Andres Klode --- flash-kernel | 36 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/flash-kernel b/flash-kernel index bf5168e..f37961f 100755 --- a/flash-kernel +++ b/flash-kernel @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ # Copyright (C) 2006

Bug#634168: installation-guide: D.3: console-setup instead of console-data

ale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. pgpvrkrzHGuzK.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#634167: installation-guide: Use C.UTF-8 locale in place of C

3.0.0-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. pgpKxXm20vKjV.pgp Description: PGP signature

Bug#634054: tasksel-data: Task kazakh-desktop misses Test-lang, always installed

27;), (250, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-rc6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/J

Bug#631396: flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100

On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:44 +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:01:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > Package: flash-kernel > > Severity: wishlist > > Updated version after some IRC comments, for review: > > > From 09e8

Bug#631396: flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100

rm -rf $TMPIMAGE error "Can not flash to $AC_IMG" fi rm -rf $TMPIMAGE ;; -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (950, 'unstable'), (250, '

Bug#629695: debian-installer: testing snapshot 6/6/11 fails to install

s under /var/log/ ... there was a faillog and lastlog but both were empty.. Andres -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=6PBOcUzR9QGZB3c6-XXr=mkg...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#609213: keyboard-configuration: non-interactive installation broken

at 13:50:21 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > Package: keyboard-configuration > > Version: 1.65 > > Severity: critical > > > > Trying to build a package in a clear chroot failed today, > > because the configuration of keyboard-configuration wants

Bug#561298: debootstrap: download_main fails to iterate through components

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.20 Tags: patch There's a bug in the following code in download_main. I've left comments in the code below describing it: # Let's assume $p contains 'coreutils' for this explanation.. # $COMPONENTS contains at least 2 entries (ie, "foo bar") for c in

Bug#561283: debootstrap: honor --components when using mirror_style 'main'

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.20 Tags: patch I have a mirror that requires mirror_style 'main' (because the top-level Release file lacks an md5sum list for Packages). However, when using a mirror_style of 'main', the COMPONENTS list is hardcoded to 'main'. This is fine if we're not specifying

Re: Selection of kernel for Lenny (was: 2.6.25-2 testing sync)

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:14 +0200 maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:09:43PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: [...] > > > > I'm having serious trouble parsing what you're trying to say here. > > Could you rephrase? > > you never checked the rh kernel. they do a *lot

debian-installer Parameters

Hello! Please, where I can find all the parameters used by the debian-installer, not the related to the hardware or kernel. In the page 8 of the bootstrap only one is shown "debian-installer/probe/usb=false" I guest there should be a lot more. Where can I find them all? Thanks.

Bug#435701: tasksel: Please add gnome-app-install to the gnome-desktop task

Package: tasksel Version: 2.68 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I would like to see gnome-app-install included in the gnome-desktop task. gnome-app-install allows automatic installation of missing codecs in gstreamer applications (starting with next upload of gst-p

Bug#383710: busybox: missing versioned build-dep on dpkg-dev

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.1.3-2 Severity: serious Attempting to build busybox on sarge yields the following during build: make[1]: Leaving directory `/busybox-1.1.3/debian/build/build-udeb' cp debian/build/build-udeb/docs/BusyBox.1 debian/build/build-udeb/docs/busybox.1 touch debian/stamps/b

Re: removal of svenl from the project

The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well. For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process: http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt This is a lot from two weeks ago,

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed > > from the project. The process is outlined here: > > <

Re: removal of svenl from the project

On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > Sven has always been a nuisance to deal w/, but up until now I have not > considered this action. In the past two weeks, the following comments > made by him have changed my mind: > > 2006-03-07: > jonas: i h

removal of svenl from the project

Hi, I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed from the project. The process is outlined here: , and I have already completed step 1. Step #2 requires the support of some 15 developers. I am attemptin

Re: Re: Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:47:01 -0500, Joey Hess wrote: [...] > > It's been no secret that the 2.4 kernel was not in good shape and hppa > folk were happier with 2.6. But this idea of just dropping 2.4 > altogether was a suprise to me. > > (FWIW, I'm also concerned that the kernel team (except for j

Re: Bug#275006: Bug still present in linux26 netinst 20041118 RC2

On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:06:39 +0900, Horms wrote: > reassign 275006 debian-installer > thanks > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 02:15:31PM +0200, Tapio Lehtonen wrote: >> Same as before, linux26 does not find the SCSI disk, aic7xxx is loaded. >> >> Installation logs in http://people.debian.org/~tale/pe

Re: creating kernel udebs from kernel-source

Hi Fabio, Thanks for feeding changes back to d-k. No one else in Ubuntu has bothered to do that thus far... On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 08:35:03 +0100, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi everybody, > ~right last week i have been asked to merge th

Re: Dropping 386 support

On Sat, 2004-10-23 at 18:35 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 11:34:50AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: [...] > > If someone from the kernel or glibc team had access to a real 386, we > > might be able to make (userspace) support work. Would it be possible to

Re: Dropping 386 support

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 00:31 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 06:01:31PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > The kernel team is considering dropping 386 support (the 80386 > > processor, not the i386 arch) from Debian. Currently, in order to > > support

Dropping 386 support

of memory, I don't consider debian 3.1 to be a viable candidate for installing onto a 386. Also, note that if we do drop 386 support, I will rename kernel-image-2.6.8-386 to kernel-image-2.6.8-486, and update optimizations accordingly. Comments? Thoughts? -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: usb memory stick booting w/ grub

On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 14:41 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Andres Salomon wrote: > > Syslinux does not work for me (as well as a few other people), for > > memory stick booting (see #273453 for more details). > > Unfortunatly, booting grub from a USB device has always failed for

usb memory stick booting w/ grub

Hi, Syslinux does not work for me (as well as a few other people), for memory stick booting (see #273453 for more details). Instead, I ended up using grub to boot from my memory stick. Since people may be interested in bypassing the syslinux/mbr dance, and/or may be more comfortable w/ grub, her

2.6 kernel removals

27;ll file bugs. Hopefully someone's working on 2.6.7 for alpha, so we can get rid of all traces of 2.6.[1-6] from sid.. -- Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#235108: SV: Bug#235108: Acknowledgement (installation-reports)

> Great. Can you try new images from > http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/ and report if there > are any regressions or new problem? I don't see any floppy images there. I did try to install using the sarge-i386-netinst.iso file from today, and it worked very well. Very cool! :) C

Bug#248787: installation-reports

On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 23:07, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 11:26:16AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 11:16, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > > * Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 11:11]: > > > > Yes, it works

Bug#248787: installation-reports

On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 11:04, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-13 10:57]: > > This is definitely not available in 2.6. The way I've historically > > checked for the existence of lvm driver support in 2.6 has been with: > >

Bug#248787: installation-reports

ed "LVM modal is not loaded". I > > looked in the /lib/modules and didn't see it in there. I'm guessing that > > Strange, this should definitely work. Okay, I see what might possibly > be wrong. Let me CC the LVM maintainer Andres Salomon. Andres, > lvmc

Bug#235108: SV: Bug#235108: Acknowledgement (installation-reports)

I tried again, this time using the CD image, and eveything worked like a charm. Just to let you know. Cheers, Andrés -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235108: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-02-27 http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Didn't get that far Date: 2004-02-27 Method: Booted of floppyimages. Got the packets from ftp.fi.debian.org. Not proxied. Machine: VMWare 4.0 running on a Dell Latitude C640.

Bug#68348: (no subject)

Package: boot-floppies Version: slink architecture i386 model ICL E4/50d memory 64M scsi Adaptec AHA1740 Tape streamer Wangtek 5525ES Hard disk Fujitsu M1606SAU cd-rom No network card ICL EtherTeam16i I suppose