Please file a bug against debootstrap.
At Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:31:26 +0200,
Emil Langrock wrote:
>
> On Sunday 26 June 2011 09:51:27 Emil Langrock wrote:
> > On Sunday 26 June 2011 11:06:05 you wrote:
> > > Does it still happen? It doesn't happen for me today.
> >
> > Yes, I still have that probl
build-essential.
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
>
> Indeed!
>
> > At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
> > Soeren Sonne
Hmm... similar bug, one year ago.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/254042
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
>
&
2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sounds like a bug for debootstrap, no?
>
> Indeed!
>
> > At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:15:53 +0100,
> > Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> > >
> > > Package: cowbuilder
> > > Version: 0.60
> > >
Hi,
At Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:58:35 -0300,
Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> Junichi Uekawa writes:
>
> > I: Unpacking zlib1g...
> > W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to
> > five times.
>
> It looks like your .deb is broke
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.12
Severity: normal
Today, debootstrap seems to die in second-stage with
W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up
to five times.
I do not seem to get any debugging message, so it's hard to understand what
might be wrong.
Hi,
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:19:51AM -0200, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> > Package: debootstrap
> >
> > The /etc/hosts file isn't copied to destination by debootstrap and the
> > pbuilder command needs this file to
> > work correctly. Without /etc/hosts the pbuilder create command shows
Hi,
> > >
> > > here's a full log of my macbook
> >
> > Does your macbook has the bootcamp upgraded firmware?
Note that macbooks are initially shipped with 'bootcamp upgraded
firmware' that supports BIOS emulation.
I think ELILO doesn't work with Debian kernel right now without the
patches, so
Hi,
> > $ chroot /target apt-get install refit
> > $ /target/sbin/gptsync /dev/sda
> > $ chroot /target
> > $ lilo /dev/sda3
> > (ignoring some warnings from lilo)
> > After this the installation continued fine, and I have no a running Debian
> > system.
>
> If we can identify a way to discover
Hi,
> After electing elilo (GRUB/LILO were presented as alternatives) installing
> elilo stalled at 50%. I had accepted to install into the only presented
> partition (/dev/sda1, about 200 MB FAT32 partition, partman reported 3.1 kB
> free memory before.). This first partition was created my t
Hi,
> >
> > # apt-get install refit (when it enters past the NEW queue)
> > # gptsync /dev/sda
> >
> > I've temporarily put refit packages on:
> > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/tmp/20060702/
>
> I chrooted into /target from the second console of d-i and
> copied the deb package I got from yo
Hi,
> > -- Forwarded Message --
> > ...
> > ...
> > Current work around is to reboot into rEFIt and run gptsync, and
> > then run d-i from CDROM, and then configure the bootloader.
> >
>
> could you please give more details about this?
# apt-get install refit (when it ente
Hi,
> > Some enterprise-level storage systems have disk-level duplication
> > system, as such, filesystem-label-based mount-point would not be the
> > end-all way of approaching the problem.
> Can you describe which designs require this? I have never heard of
> such a setup, and I have some doubts
Hi,
> > - Are there likely to be architecture specific issues with persistent
> > device naming?
> > - Or with filesystems other than ext2/ext3?
> Nothing I know about. "tree /dev/disk/" should give you some ideas.
> by-label links are user friendly, but may become ambiguous if users
> carelessl
>
> I am not sure, current whiptail looks completely broken, in UTF-8 mode
> as well as with non-UTF-8 locales. If the maintainer does not even
> manage to reply to my bug report, I guess we will have to go back and
> fork a working whiptail-utf8 again.
>
> Just my 0.02¤, still hadn't time to get
debian/changelog 2003-07-27 08:14:14.0 +0900
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+modconf (0.2.45) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix whiptail conflicts (closes: #191636)
+
+ -- Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 27 Jul 2003 08:14:01 +0900
+
modconf (0.2.44) unstable; urgency=low
* Eduard
> In trying to install my new copy of Woody ( which I received today) I
> repeatedly got the message debootstrap exited with an error (return value 1)
>
> I have tried installing on two machines, neither of very high quality, with
> the same result.
>
> I am not able to boot up the machine, so
> I plan to export over the boot-floppies/documentation and import it into
> the debian-installer/documentation tree, to start the
> user-documentation task.
> Any objections, or better ideas?
I'd like it so that boot-floppies/documentation is marked that
this documentation is deprecated.
It's
Mar 2003 13:21:50 -
Received: from unknown (HELO atoron.dancer.pr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1)
by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 31 Mar 2003 13:21:50 -
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 22:20:21 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Alas
> Since it's a generic rule that "*-bf" packages should not contain
> manpages, I'm of the opinion that a new rule should be added to
> lintian, rather than adding overrides to all *-bf packages.
>
> Further more, since I don't think the new debian-installer is using
> those *-bf packages, but use
> > But you are right, we should get 2.4 working instead of hacking devfs into
> > or out of d-i...
>
> Sure, but in the mean time we have to make sure there's an installer for
> m68k that actually works. Else we could just as well shut down all m68k
> buildd's, as it will not be worth it anymore.
> > > mklibs fails to find the PIC library for reduction since it's called
> > > libnewt-utf8_pic.a while mklibs expects it to simply be libnewt_pic.a
> > >
> > > We're using newt debian-installer so it'd be nice if this were fixed so
> > > we could save some bytes on the boot media. :-)
> >
> >
> mklibs fails to find the PIC library for reduction since it's called
> libnewt-utf8_pic.a while mklibs expects it to simply be libnewt_pic.a
>
> We're using newt debian-installer so it'd be nice if this were fixed so
> we could save some bytes on the boot media. :-)
I have a few questions:
I'
> > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf
> > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs
> > and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave
> > it to the package maintainers?
>
> I was kind of hoping that we would be
> I can do a big load at the boot of this mini-system, but
> due to technical constraints, i can't use a NFS exported partition (of a server) to
>realize it.
What kind of technical constraints is it that you can't use a NFS exported partition?
I usually find it convenient to use NFS-root.
regar
> > I think this bug should be dealt on boot-floppies side.
> > Shouldn't it ?
>
> HOW? It would be easy to add this to debootstrap's call, but if the
> packaging is missing in basedebs.tar, people installing from it would
> fail. So debootstrap would require an update, or at least a change in
>
> eject is missing from the woody basedebs. On powerpc, this makes changing
> the CDs extremely awkward (newbies rarely dare poke a paper clip into the
> CD tray). Installation from CD is impeded severely, hence the severity of
> critical.
I think this bug should be dealt on boot-floppies side.
> > I understand that. But just like we have a bunch of architectures, we
> > have a bunch of netboot options. You generally don't have a lot of
> > choices about what your hardware supports. Telling someone whose card
> > doesn't support pxe to use pxe because it's better is no more sensible
> > t
> We still need to have an eye on the space that is occupied on the
> ramdisk. The udebs do not contain any unneeded modules or
> documentation and in some cases they use other compile options then
> their deb counterparts.
They should not be "deb/udeb counterparts" that are
binary-incompatible.
> We still need to have an eye on the space that is occupied on the
> ramdisk. The udebs do not contain any unneeded modules or
> documentation and in some cases they use other compile options then
> their deb counterparts. A good example is directfb:
They should change their sonames,
at least th
> > We are probably not going to have a floppy image from them (which
> > will involve having PIC packages for each library package, which is
> > a big burden) and if we are not going to need to fit on a floppy,
> > what is the point of making a udeb for ?
>
> No, there is no way that they will fi
> I've finally managed to build, but not test, udebs for glib, pango,
> and gtk+-directfb.
I'm having doubts on whether we really need udebs for them.
I want some clarification on this point.
We are probably not going to have a floppy image from
them (which will involve having PIC packages for
> > reassign 171027 boot-floppies
> Does it means changing Subject: for boot floppies?
> Sorry, if not.
It is just a cosmetical/technical thing in the bug tracking system. Not related to the
subject.
> > At Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:58:34 +0100,
> > Ruzsinszky Attila wrote:
> > > architecture: sparc
> Let's first have a working installer on at least a few arches before
> walking down that road. However, it is a problem which I was notified
> of a few days ago: d-i relies heavily on devfs and, well, 2.4 doesn't
> work on m68k and it doesn't look like it will in the foreseeable
> future. So, h
> > You seem to have already solved the problem, but
> > "pbuilder" attempts at this problem and other things by
> > doing a two-phase install.
> >
> > debootstrap the base system,
> > then using APT to install the rest.
>
> A two-stage process does not help me. I am trying to build
> a small
At 14 Nov 2002 00:10:32 +0100,
Martin Sj�gren wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> tis 2002-11-05 klockan 03.18 skrev Junichi Uekawa:
> > > But surely "adding stuff to a data structure" is a backward-incompatible
> > > change?
> >
> > It depends on the way you
At Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:24:08 -0500,
Bao C. Ha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am playing with debootstrap to build a custom base system.
> I would like to include freeswan in the list of deb packages.
> Unfortunately, freeswan is in the non-US archive. I just
> wonder if there is an easy way to do
> > Please use strdup and friends, or asprintf, or other kind of
> > things that are less prone to break.
>
> Ok, I will use strdup. While we are on it, why are return values of
> allocation routines never checked?
You could add checks, or use/define xstrdup to give some
useful error message.
> > > Do you really think that there are no Japanese people outside of Japan?
> >
> > Then they should use ja_CA or whatever they want.
>
> No, this locale does not exist.
That doesn't really matter if it doesn't currently exist on
your system. You can always make one.
regards,
junich
>
> > Why does it have to be char something[] when
> > char * something will perfectly work ?
>
> I did not say it has to be a char[6], I do not care if someone wants to
> malloc it.
>
Please use strdup and friends, or asprintf, or other kind of
things that are less prone to break.
--
To U
> > They are in
> > language_country.codeset format.
> > ja_JP is Japan,
> > pt_BR is Brazil.
> >
> > What is the problem?
> [...]
>
> Do you really think that there are no Japanese people outside of Japan?
Then they should use
ja_CA or whatever they want.
regards,
junichi
--
To UNS
> >
> > I was thinking more of
> > if (locale == "C")
> > question user;
> > else
> > get country from locale.
>
> It doesn't work, you can't get country from locale, you must always ask
> user to tell where he lives.
Huh?
They are in
language_country.codeset
> Are you talking about language names? They are either ll or ll_LL.
> As everything will be UTF-8 encoded, there is no need to add encoding.
There is probably a need to add a UTF-8 encoding something,
but there probably isn't really a need.
Why does it have to be char something[] when
char * so
There are two points I am unconfortable with this patch:
Why not use locale information ? (it is needed for some frontend and
other things)
and why is the country information 6-chars long?
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
> > we don't need to bump soversion at all, unless we make
> > backward-incompatible changes. just bump minor (and don't change the
> > packaging name). Also, fix shlibs to depend on that version or
> > later.
>
> But surely "adding stuff to a data structure" is a backward-incompatible
> change
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 09:52:32 -0500
Scott Ehrlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am interested in trying to create and NFS-capable boot floppy.
> What steps are needed? Where do I start?
>
> I have set up many Linux boxes before and have mounted drives, compiled
> stuff (including new kernels)
k you need:
ssh
xbase-clients
and some playing with /etc/passwd.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSC
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
like it could be done.
Sounds like a pretty interesting/exciting idea,
although it is not currently implemented,
it should be doable.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF
installer can also run inside bogl.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
quired ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 20:16:58 +0200
Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Putting the driver on the floppy costs space, so two languages would
> have to go (they will be available when the CDROM is accessible), "ja" and
> "es". The language catalogs on the floppy image would be: en pt de fr.
On 20 Sep 2002 03:32:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Debian Boot CVS Master
>
> | add setlocale call to each main(), and switch slang to slang-utf8
>
> Have you tested that slang-utf8 works properly with cdebconf?
I've checked now, it seems to be working fine.
rega
On 20 Sep 2002 03:32:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Debian Boot CVS Master
>
> | add setlocale call to each main(), and switch slang to slang-utf8
>
> Have you tested that slang-utf8 works properly with cdebconf?
No. But enabling setlocale requires slang-utf8.
re
ebian/changelog16 Sep 2002 23:40:53 - 1.28
+++ debian/changelog19 Sep 2002 17:10:01 -
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
+cdebconf (0.24) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * NOT YET RELEASED
+ * Junichi Uekawa:
+- debconf, debconf-copydb, debconf-loadtemplate, dpkg-reconfigure: call setlocale
+-
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002 19:10:34 +0200
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moshe tells me that I need to commit my Catalan templates in UTF-8
No
The templates files should not be in UTF-8.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
--
To UNSUBSCR
On 13 Sep 2002 10:29:55 +0200
> > Could we move that out of Description-xx: lines to
> > generate some kind of po file?
>
> Believe me, nobody would be happier than me if we used po files instead
> ;)
>
> I was only working with it like this because this was the current
> concept of translatin
> sure, still valid UTF-8, but it's UTF-8 for what the UTF-8 is if
> interpreted according to Latin1. I thought dpkg didn't assume anything
> at all about the encoding in control files? That it expected us-ascii
> and damn everyone who didn't follow that. Can I fix this somehow, or are
> we doom
ext, and perhaps make a small version of gettext
> to include on boot floppies.
Are you mentioning "pointerize" ?
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libp
r debconf versions to crash)
We already have many templates files that are in the legacy encoding,
and it's not impossible to maintain a lang->charset mapping table.
There already is one in the BTS.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 09:45:54 -0600
Debian Boot CVS Master <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Repository: debian-installer/doc
> who:porridge
> time: Wed Sep 11 09:45:54 MDT 2002
> Log Message:
> Tidied up. Comments are very welcome.
>
>
> Files:
> changed:i18n.txt
> * cdebc
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 00:41:35 -0400
Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ja.po files are in EUC-JP.
> Well, they *can* be UTF-8.
They usually aren't.
> > Wouldn't just having "Description-ll_LL.ENCODING:" fields work fine ?
> > I've got a feeling that it's doable.
> >
> > I can think o
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 21:55:29 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My plan was to add support to debconf to use iconv to convert to
nl_langinfo(CODESET), from the template encoding (which is legacy
ISO-8859-whatever, or EUC-whatever).
That way, no transition (breakage) in terms of debconf t
ne
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:36:58 +0200
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> - for udebs, we:
>* make the templates.ll files in whatever encoding we like
>* recode (say using iconv) the templates.ll to UTF-8 when creating
> the "combined" templates file
>* simply copy the
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:36:58 +0200
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Am I right that cdebconf handles the templates in debian-installer?
>
> 2. Is this possible on all architectures? I mean: do all architectures
>use framebuffer?
>That also means that bterm will be "Essential
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:50:26 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> [...]
> > - for debs (base system), we:
> >* make the templates.ll files in whatever encoding
> >* either recode them or not when concatening
> [
> > ISO-8859-? for most european countries, EUC-JP in Japan,
> > and so on.
> >
> > Not what your environment variable holds.
>
> Hmm. I meant to ask whether "or am I cursed with Latin1 because I happen
> to live in western Europe?" (but I must've forgotten it somehow) which
> it seems I am. So
On 09 Sep 2002 09:07:47 +0200
>
> > > Also, a pretty standard policy when translating things is to try not to
> > > change the "meaning" of the text.
> >
> > Huh? I only want to change the default value, how does it have an impact
> > on the meaning of the text?
>
> Changing the default value
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:51:49 -0700
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > | For floppy installs, why not plan on having a floppy version available
> > | in each language rather than trying to do a multilingual floppy?
> >
> > Because we will then have a zillion different floppies to choos
all I suppose, but what else?)
El-torito bootable CD image ?
Are we still using 2.88MB image is used for booting from the CD-Rom?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.ne
ay be required.
Note that debian-installer goes very far back from boot-floppies in
respect to i18n.
boot-floppies worked around the size constraints by loading
locale information from file on CD-Rom, if it was available.
(xlp.tgz).
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi U
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&
Hi,
I don't know if it's really a feasible solution, or what people had in mind, but
I had a quick-hack into what might be "udebootstrap", IMO.
This application takes in a predetermined directory filled with udebs and debs,
and extract them using tar, ar, and zcat.
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~d
On Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:30:32 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
> But where must PO files go?
> There are at least 2 ways:
> * all messages in a central place (debian-installer/po/ or
> debian-installer/libdebian-installer/po/ so that PO catalogs may
> be shipped with libdebi
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:44:03 -0700
"Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was no response to this request on the debian-powerpc list, I
> guess it really belongs to debian-boot (cc'd).
>
> Since the consensus is that the current prep and chrp kernels which
> we supply as part of boot
On 02 Sep 2002 16:48:05 +0200
>
> I've added the build-dep, but I don't get a versioned binary depend.
>
> Hmm. Come to think of it, why doesn't libd-i have the SONAME in the
> package name?
Yes, this is a very badly packaged shared library.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 02 Sep 2002 09:56:11 +0200
> I'm getting ready to commit my changes that make anna and main-menu
> share Packages-file parsing code. They do so by a function in libd-i.
> This means that if you want to build anna or main-menu after I've
> committed, you first have to build and install the new
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 02:36:33 +1000
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's going to go on the rootfs? Presumably something like:
>
> libc6, busybox-udeb, ash-udeb
> udpkg, cdebconf, anna
> *-retriever and any dependencies they have
> /lib/modules//**
It could b
On 26 Aug 2002 00:39:06 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> It is difficult to reduce a library if you don't know what functions
> in it will be used. Since additional modules could be dropped onto
> install media at any time, it is very difficult to guarantee that a
>
On 19 Aug 2002 13:05:37 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > UTF-8.
> |
> | I think they need to be written in latin-1, and then converted to UTF-8
> | possibly in the build scripts.
>
> uhm, why?
Aren't there already packages which are producing debs and udebs at
the same ti
On 18 Aug 2002 16:51:42 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Come to think of it. Which character set should be used? I usually use
> | UTF-8 for everything these days, but I think that Swedish translations
> | of debconf templates have been in Latin1 before...
>
> UTF-8.
I thin
On 15 Aug 2002 15:34:30 +0200
Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | you need to coordinate with joey hess before you upload the new
> | cdebconf. we need debconf to move to the new debconf-api dependency
> | as well.
>
> uhm, can't just cdebconf provide it for now and debconf provide i
build-essential
list.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
t this.
udeb packaging policy;
like:
install shared library matching their soname....
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
seful.
Get back to hacking...
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
b-f only,
and there are a few people working on at least maintaining the
code.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dan
In Mon, 1 Jul 2002 15:24:19 +0200 (CEST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate
scripsit :
One line of advise:
Please use diff -u. It's much easier to read.
> With the attached patch below, I would have spent only 2 seconds.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp
vid or someone can look at this patch.
We already build depend on gawk.
I wonder what this guy is up to.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http:
I need
> to test it properly.
Whoops, I already uploaded one.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
gt; base-config from a local repository, so I need a fix for this.
What do you need to do ?
Wouldn't it be possible to just create your own
apt archive with only minimal packages to fool
debootstrap into thinking that it is the "real" archive?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Ue
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:56:38PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > I've pondered with the code a bit, and I think this is an overkill to
> > require aptitude in base.
>
> By having base-config Depend: on
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 13:20:33 +1000
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 04:02:11PM +0200, Ivo Timmermans wrote:
> > The new base-config package in sid depends on aptitude, so debootstrap
> > should download it.
>
> Bleh. Guys, please file the bug on debootstrap *b
reassign 149971 debootstrap
thanks
I think this is a bug in base-config or debootstrap.
Are we adding aptitude to base ?
> Today, trying to "pbuilder create --distribution sid", creation failed.
> The reported exit message is:
>
>W: Failure while configuring base packages. This will be at
Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit:
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 01:59, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> > For Japanese, we at least need some kind of debconf fix for
> > utf-8 character conversion support, or a working japanese character
> > te
at it) are:
support for utf-8 in debconf
possible slang-utf-8 for cdebconf ?
tweak slang/newt for languages support.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libp
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:37:24 -0400
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, this is just not going to happen for woody, r0 at least. I have
> never gotten a well-tested patch to base-config that is obviously
> correct. I did get a great deal of off-the-cuff, untested, large,
> nonobvious, pe
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.10-7.1
Tags: patch
Two things:
build against slang-utf8, and set UTF8.
diff -ru cdebconf-0.10-orig/debian/control cdebconf-0.10/debian/control
--- cdebconf-0.10-orig/debian/control Tue Jan 1 03:44:16 2002
+++ cdebconf-0.10/debian/controlWed May 29 15:57
late. Thoughts, joeyh?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &
1 - 100 of 269 matches
Mail list logo
