> We still need to have an eye on the space that is occupied on the > ramdisk. The udebs do not contain any unneeded modules or > documentation and in some cases they use other compile options then > their deb counterparts. A good example is directfb:
They should change their sonames, at least this looks very problematic, and will result in relocation errors in some cases. > > Library from .deb: > > coyote:~# ldd /usr/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.15 > libSDL-1.2.so.0 => /usr/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 (0x4004f000) > libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x400ba000) > libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400db000) > libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x40195000) > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x401a2000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x401a5000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x401f4000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) > > Library from .udeb > > coyote:~# ldd /home/sl/debian-installer/usr/lib/libdirectfb-0.9.so.15.0.0 > libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x4004b000) > libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4004f000) > libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4009e000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) > > If we used the .deb we needed to pull in sdl and xlibs as well, what > is certainly not what we want. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
