Bug#776218: installation-reports: Reportbug needs python-vte, which is not installed in the default installation

2015-01-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > (major) The missing packages should be installed from the beginning. These are > python-vte and python-gtkspell (which reportbug also wants). Might be a good idea for some gnome packages to pull those packages? I’m not sure it’s the

Bug#765839: Accepted tasksel 3.29 (source all) into unstable

2014-10-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
check before? > Specific information about eg, powerpc hardware that can and cannot > support it would be useful. Have the porters been put in the loop? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
rld computers. Thanks for making the point that with llvmpipe, GNOME is perfectly usable on a machine without 3D. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Re: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Reverting to GNOME for jessie's default desktop

2014-08-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
ing GNOME 3). It turns out that with a recent adapter, 3D applications are running a small bit faster under GNOME, and that’s probably because it saves your graphics card the pain to switch from 2D to 3D contexts. -- .''`.Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSU

Bug#739011: debian-installer: broken monospace font in g-i

2014-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
vail to the udeb. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1392549387.4489.10.ca...@kagura.malsain.org

Bug#691334: task-gnome-desktop: Recommends obsolete system-config-printer

2012-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
s). Certainly, but at the very least the notification area thingy (s-c-p-applet) should be disabled with NotShowIn=GNOME then. There should not be 2 applets running for the same functionality. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSU

Bug#691334: task-gnome-desktop: Recommends obsolete system-config-printer

2012-10-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: task-gnome-desktop Version: 3.13 Severity: important The system-config-printer package is still installed by default. The GNOME control center now includes a configuration tool for cups, and the settings daemon replaces the features of s-c-p-applet. Therefore the functionality is dupli

Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment

2012-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
op spreading FUD. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1347376072.25952.337.camel@pi0307572

Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment

2012-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 11 septembre 2012 à 10:34 -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit : > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 03:23:09PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > You can’t be serious. Xfce is way more different from GNOME 2 than GNOME > > 3 classic is. > > Well if gnome 3 classic was the def

Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment

2012-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
h was useless and buggy anyway). Unless you talk about gnome-shell which is an entirely different piece of software. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment

2012-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
wever, it still lacks a number of features and for many use cases, you need pieces of GNOME with it. > Please do not accuse fellow contributors of bad faith. I would not qualify most of the whiners as “fellow contributors”. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `'

Re: CD1 without a network mirror isn't sufficient to install a full desktop environment

2012-09-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
d Ubuntu too IIRC) makes “GNOME classic” available right from the login manager, with the default installation. Not considering gnome-panel 3.x a continuation of the existing environment is purely bad faith. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Debian Installation Alpha 1 AMD64 netinst ISO installation report

2012-05-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
e sound issues. A wild guess: when installing gstreamer0.10-pulseaudio some other backends were removed, and no dependency remained on alsa-base. Since alsa-base is essential to having working sound, I’d suggest moving it to priority important, and/or adding a dependency somewhere in the stack (pul

Bug#667703: Please remove synaptic entirely from task-desktop

2012-04-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
It should be the role of metapackages to handle which packages are installed onto which desktop environment. The gnome metapackage already pulls synaptic. If we decide one day to replace it, it shouldn’t need two changes, one in gnome and one in tasksel. Cheers, -- .''`. Jossel

Bug#652275: Guided partitioning should not offer separate /usr, /var, and /tmp partitions; leave that to manual partitioning

2011-12-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
l greatly increase with the number of filesystems to check. If no files were modified in /usr, they won’t be mentioned in the journal, and that’s all. But having one journal to parse for all the system is definitely a measurable improvement. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :'

Re: Bug#513964: base-passwd: please add netdev and powerdev groups to group.master (was: Bug#513964: gnome-power-manager: suspend fails with no errors visually or to stderr)

2011-02-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
as surprised this has not been fixed yet. > > First, user-setup should always add the first user to netdev and > powerdev, as Josselin already pointed out: This bug dates from 2006. These groups are obsolete now, these authorizations rely on consolekit instead. -- .''`.

Re: RFC: bringing back task packages

2011-02-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 17 février 2011 à 19:20 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > ### gnome > > Would the gnome team want to maintain a task-gnome? > Much of tasksel's gnome task is already taken from the gnome-core > and gnome metapackages, with a few more things added. Yes, they fit globally the same purpose. Th

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 09:58 +0100, Philip Hands a écrit : > > For PolicyKit, I can now simply ship a file, say > > /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/51-debian-sudo.conf which contains: > > > > [Configuration] > > AdminIdentities=unix-group:sudo > > I would object to 'sudo' being a group of

Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for users with administrative privileges

2010-10-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
[1]? This would be an even worse disaster than “admin”, for similar reasons. Users of the “wheel” group were not supposed to get root privileges with their own password. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed

Bug#579155: tasksel: installs *two* entire office suites

2010-09-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 27 septembre 2010 à 11:25 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > Am 27.09.2010 09:04, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > > I’ve seen that (with both abiword and gnumeric), and I’ve seen the > > opposite too: documents that display fine in OOo but have everything > >

Bug#579155: tasksel: installs *two* entire office suites

2010-09-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
; > > > > Am Montag, den 26.04.2010, 11:02 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > > > That’s not a good solution either, since there are lots of features OOo > > > has that abiword/gnumeric don’t. > > > > I'd say that people who know they will use the advanced

Bug#597239: user-setup: Should add user to sudo group instead of modifying sudoers

2010-09-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
such users to benefit from PolicyKit exceptions in a similar way to sudo , so this is an important change to get in squeeze. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see wh

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
er, copy your data there using one of the numerous solutions in Debian, and get done with it. Or just state that you can’t backup modern Linux servers with it, and let them struggle with Windows servers if they really decide to use this instead. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouett

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
alternative to grub2 in the installer? -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: lilo removal in squeeze (or, "please test grub2")

2010-05-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
sitory for orphaned packages. We are supposed to keep them in shape for the lifetime of the release. > The Lord bless you, William. May His noodly appendage touch you. Ramen, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmail

Bug#579155: tasksel: installs *two* entire office suites

2010-04-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 26 avril 2010 à 10:50 +0200, Fabian Greffrath a écrit : > Am 26.04.2010 09:33, schrieb Josselin Mouette: > > I agree it is a problem, but there is no perfect solution. > >* The OOo integration with GNOME is a joke. > >* Gnumeric and Abiword both have

Bug#579155: tasksel: installs *two* entire office suites

2010-04-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
As for planner, I’m not sure either. Maybe it’s not suitable for the default installation. In all cases, dropping gnome-office altogether is not the way to go, since currently it’s the dependency that brings inkscape (which beats OOo draw by knock-out), gimp and xsane. Cheers, -- .'&#

Re: Sudo mode and policykit

2010-03-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 26 mars 2010 à 15:15 -0300, Margarita Manterola a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:42 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > In squeeze, with consolekit installed, a lot of groups are made > > obsolete: audio, netdev, powerdev, plugdev, video (modulo a number of

Re: Sudo mode and policykit

2010-03-26 Thread Josselin Mouette
this direction. Maybe we can also jump on the occasion to remove them from user-setup at this time. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “A handshake with whitnesses is the same `- as a signed contact.” -- Jörg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d

Sudo mode and policykit

2010-03-25 Thread Josselin Mouette
-i should be very straightforward, but I think this needs to be done for squeeze for the sake of consistency. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `-[…] I will see what I can do for you.

Re: Towards X11-based d-i: Gone through NEW

2010-03-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
here’s no harm in doing so, but be warned that we intend to upload these 2.30 packages to unstable very soon. Apart from some shlibs bumps, they are not part of any planned transition for 2.30, so this shouldn’t cause any trouble. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `&#x

Please unblock gtk2-engines

2009-08-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, gtk2-engines 1:2.18.2-1 has been ready to migrate for quite a while, so could you please unblock it? Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling signa

Bug#532515: on making decisions vs letting things happen

2009-07-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
are ready. Anyway fitting all of this on the first CD is out of question. The primary package still being gnome-desktop-environment, I guess we should focus the size efforts on this one and ensure it can still fit on one CD. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “

Bug#532515: Please discuss the contents of the installation with the GNOME team, as usual

2009-07-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
hasn’t expressed any will to involve in GNOME maintenance. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de m

Please unblock glib2.0 and atk1.0

2009-05-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, glib2.0 and atk1.0 have been ready to migrate to testing for a while. The former has a RC bug fixed and the other which is Is it possible to unblock them? Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `-

Please unblock gtk+2.0

2009-04-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, please let gtk+ 2.16 go into testing. It is blocking, among other things, the gnome-desktop transition. Thanks, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schil

Please unblock atk1.0

2009-04-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, atk1.0 (which has an udeb) is blocked and cannot enter testing at the moment. Would it be possible to unblock it? BTW, I don’t know whether this is possible, but it would be nice if the rules for udeb migration could be relaxed for a while, given the expected amount of updates. Thanks, --

Bug#523487: closed by Anton Zinoviev (Bug#523487: fixed in console-setup 1.31)

2009-04-12 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 12 avril 2009 à 15:39 +, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : > >* Recognize 'Option "XkbLayout" "layout(variant)" in xorg.conf. Thanks > > to Josselin Mouette, closes: #523487. Thanks for the quick fix. -- .'&#x

Bug#523487: Acknowledgement (Asks for keyboard origin upon installation (debconf abuse?))

2009-04-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
I should add that after selecting the origin of the keyboard (whatever “origin” means), the generated configuration was wrong: fr with latin9 variant. I had to re-run dpkg-reconfigure console-setup and *reboot* to get a correct keyboard mapping. -- .''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenny" has been released

Bug#523487: Asks for keyboard origin upon installation (debconf abuse?)

2009-04-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: console-setup Version: 1.30 Severity: important When I upgraded X today, it installed console-setup, and although my debconf priority is set to high, I was asked the "keyboard origin" question, without even a satisfying default selected. I can reproduce that by installing console-setup o

Re: upcoming point releases

2009-03-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 20:26 +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : > Please have a look at the respective websites [0] [1] [2] for a more or > less up-to-date status of the preparations. The installer team requested that gtk+ 2.12.12 made it soon enough for the d-i update, but I see it is still pending.

Re: Bug#520642: gtk2-engines-udeb: depends on non-udeb packages on hppa, among other things

2009-03-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 21 mars 2009 à 15:34 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit : > gtk2-engines-udeb exhibits two problems on hppa, though the second of > them may be applicable to other arches as well. > > In the first place, gtk2-engines-udeb 2.14.3-2 and 2.16.1-2 depend on > libdirectfb-1.0-0-udeb, but only on hp

Re: handling group membership in and outside d-i

2009-03-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 04 mars 2009 à 17:55 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > Personally, I believe adding users to these groups at install time is > the wrong approach, and believe the only scalable way to handle this > is with policykit like features. Then the group membership is handled > dynamically

Please unblock glib2.0 and gtk+2.0

2009-02-27 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, glib2.0 and gtk+2.0 should be ready to migrate to squeeze today. Since they contain udebs, they need manual handling. Could you please unblock them? After that, the road is open for GTK+ 2.14 in unstable and GTK+ 2.12.12 in lenny, as discussed before. Cheers, -- .''`. Debian 5.0 "Lenn

Re: Bug#513964: gnome-power-manager: suspend fails with no errors visually or to stderr

2009-02-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 14:57 +, Colin Watson a écrit : > group.master is a hard thing to change our mind about later, and frankly > I have never had the impression that these hardware access groups are > terribly stable. Why can't we just have user-setup create the groups > dynamically ('ad

Bug#513964: gnome-power-manager: suspend fails with no errors visually or to stderr

2009-02-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
reassign 513964 base-passwd retitle 513964 please add netdev and powerdev groups to group.master thanks Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 15:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > My user (again 'jon') is not in powerdev or netdev but is > > in plugdev. I did not have networking

Re: Bug#513964: gnome-power-manager: suspend fails with no errors visually or to stderr

2009-02-24 Thread Josselin Mouette
reassign 513964 user-setup thanks Le mardi 24 février 2009 à 14:14 +, Jon Dowland a écrit : > I've just performed a basic Debian lenny installation using > the official netinst > > 0dcc554ddcbfbfb43eb2afd8ae7090b8 debian-500-i386-netinst.iso > > My user (again 'jon') is not in powerdev or n

Re: GTK+ 2.14 and directFB

2009-02-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 21 février 2009 à 18:45 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > Hi, > > On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 16:26 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > I’ve just uploaded 2.14.7-3 to experimental. Comments welcome. > > >From looking at the changelog it appears that you did no

Re: GTK+ 2.14 and directFB

2009-02-21 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 21 février 2009 à 12:54 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > I am somewhat surprised that there is still no GTK+ 2.14 package that > has the DirectFB fixes applied, not even in experimental. I spent the > last two evenings to fix all problems you pointed out. If there are > still issues with t

GTK+ 2.14 and directFB

2009-02-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi again, thanks to Sven Neumann who jumped in very quickly to resolve this issue, we now have a set of GTK+ 2.14 packages that are supposed to have a working DirectFB backend. I have just uploaded this version (2.14.7-2) to experimental. The packages should install fine on unstable, so there is

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 20:49 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > Please note that I can only commit changes to trunk (and then merge them > to the gtk-2-14 branch). There's no point in applying changes to the > gtk-2-12 branch as that branch is obsolete. The patches I pointed to you apply to the 2

Re: [directfb-dev] Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 17:54 +0100, Sven Neumann a écrit : > I can get your patches into gtk+ SVN if you do the patch review. Just > point me to bug reports at bugzilla.gnome.org that have patches for > GTK-DirectFB attached that you want to see committed and I will take > care of committing th

Re: GTK+ update proposal for stable

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 12:48 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > > If SRM do not object I think it would be nice to have them there ASAP so > > we can start testing them. > > Unfortunately a new GTK

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 17:26 +0100, Davide Viti a écrit : > So I see the issue, I also see patches floating around (such as > mentioned by Colin Watson e.g.) and I'm also willing to but effort in > this to get it working again. > > Thing is, with the submitted patch, I do not see someone at GT

Re: GTK+ update proposal for stable

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:07 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > Josselin Mouette writes: > > I don’t have anything right now that I’d like to put in these packages, > > so the thing they need the most is testing. I can upload them to s-p-u > > as soon as you want. >

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 22:14 +0100, Bastian Blank a écrit : > Can you do a size estimate for this? It would need in addition > - the X server, > - evdev input module and > - a framebuffer video module. > > Anything else? XKB data, a number of libraries, a "fixed" font, I guess. Currently

Re: Uploading GNOME 2.24 to sid

2009-02-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 17:05 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > Your comment fears me even more since it does look that we can end up > without directfb support for long time... I think you agree with me that > Graphical Installer can't be droped from Debian without a lot of people > being u

Re: GTK+ update proposal for stable

2009-02-15 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 15 février 2009 à 15:36 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > Philipp Kern writes: > > Ok, please go ahead. Thanks for contacting us that early so that it > > spends "plenty" of time in proposed-updates. We will see what d-i > > testing with the new binaries will bring us. > > In this

Bug#504659: tasksel: Gnome pushes File and DNS server and language tasks off CD1

2008-11-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 06 novembre 2008 à 00:01 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > It looks like the main reason for this is the recent changes in the > gnome-desktop task, which changed its "key" package to 'gnome' from > 'gnome-desktop-environment'. You’re raising quite a while after we discussed it. I wonder why

Re: Another round of GNOME unblock requests

2008-11-06 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 31 octobre 2008 à 11:12 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : > > vte (1:0.16.14-4) unstable; urgency=low > > Looks fine, need d-i RM ACK. Please, debian-boot? This is a very important fix for anjuta. BTW, it needs a give-back on hppa now that pango1.0 and gtk+2.0 have been rebuilt

Bug#502526: tasksel: please install rarian-compat in the gnome-desktop task

2008-10-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: tasksel Version: 2.75 Hi, currently the gnome-core package depends on rarian-compat | scrollkeeper; however, because of the other dependencies, the default lenny installation selects scrollkeeper by default. As scrollkeeper is deprecated in favor of rarian-compat by upstream, causes per

Re: Bug#499662: Proposed changes for #499662

2008-10-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 02 octobre 2008 à 20:52 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > Dave Beckett wrote: > > The patch looks OK although I cannot test any directfb stuff, or do > > any cairo work today. > > > > One reason the directfb was NOT enabled in the main cairo package > > by me is that it is unsupported upstream

Re: Please unblock pango1.0/1.20.5-2

2008-09-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 30 août 2008 à 19:25 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Hi, > > > > please consider pango1.0/1.20.5-2 for lenny. There is only one > > significant change, which was requested by Malayalam speakers: > > > >* 20_indic_r

Re: Please unblock gtk+2.0

2008-08-08 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 29 juillet 2008 à 14:50 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : > Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to see gtk+2.0 2.12.11-3 allowed in lenny. It was uploaded > > before the freeze but needs manual unblocking because of the ude

Please unblock gtk+2.0

2008-07-29 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, I’d like to see gtk+2.0 2.12.11-3 allowed in lenny. It was uploaded before the freeze but needs manual unblocking because of the udeb. Upstream changes are mostly translations and fixes for several crashers. We also fix #471073 and similar issues affecting nautilus, rhythmbox and the filechoo

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 23 juin 2008 à 11:50 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > If you use gnome, it will always be pulled by epiphany-extensions > > anyway. > > It seemed to me that epiphany-extensions depends on epiphany-gecko, but > that epiphany-browser was not pulled in by that. The epiphany-browser package on

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 22 juin 2008 à 22:54 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > I checked every package in tasksel's current gnome task to ensure it > was still being pulled in using the new meta-gnome2 and the new task... > # several packages recommend this, make sure it's available in case > # things that depend

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 22:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > The current version can be found there: > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gnome/desktop/unstable/meta-gnome2/debian/control.in?op=file&rev=0&sc=0 I have just uploaded meta-gnome2 2.22.2~2 to NEW (because of

Re: Considerations for lilo removal

2008-06-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 18 juin 2008 à 09:52 +0300, Eric Pozharski a écrit : > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > OTOH, aren't most of these choosing lilo over grub only doing so by > > habit ? > > OTOH, aren't most of theses choosing emacs over vim only doing so by > habit? The

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 18:59 +0200, Per Olofsson a écrit : > Eric Dorland wrote: > > As to whether to include Iceweasel over epiphany (or whatever) in the > > gnome task, that's probably the gnome team's call. However, Iceweasel > > is clearly the more popular one and 3.0 does have better integrat

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 13:27 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > It does not prevent us from shipping a better integrated word processor, > > while setting OOo as the default handler for .doc files (currently it is > > not, but I can easily change that). > > I prefer not to have multiple choices of pr

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:04 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > > Cool, are you finally willing to drop iceweasel from the gnome-desktop > > task then? > > I'd say to drop epiphany. Iceweasel/Firefox are the expected ones. Firefox is ages behind Epiphany when it comes to desktop integration. Jus

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 10:24 -0300, Otavio Salvador a écrit : > > It does not prevent us from shipping a better integrated word processor, > > while setting OOo as the default handler for .doc files (currently it is > > not, but I can easily change that). > > I think providing multiple alternativ

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 juin 2008 à 12:05 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit : > Here's some data about the desktop task (installed size using network > mirror): > Sarge: 1392 MB (included GNOME _and_ KDE) > Etch: 1360 MB (GNOME only) > Lenny: 1857 MB (GNOME only) As a side note, it would be interesting to know how m

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 02 juin 2008 à 14:10 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > There's a fundamental difference between the gnome package and the > gnome-desktop task. The former is the complere gnome desktop environment > with all extras, as shipped by gnome, while the latter attempts to be > the best gnome-based des

Bug#484121: tasksel: let's sync on the GNOME task

2008-06-02 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: tasksel Version: 2.74.2 Severity: wishlist Hi, I think it is time to wonder what should go in the default GNOME installation for the lenny release. Currently, the "gnome-desktop" task consists of the "gnome-desktop-environment" metapackage (official GNOME release) plus a number of extra

Re: Bug#481689: should default to gksudo if root doesn't have a password

2008-05-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 17 mai 2008 à 20:40 -0400, Avery Fay a écrit : > I didn't install the desktop task during the initial installation, so I > don't think it can be solved in the installer. (I did install it after > initial installation) It could be solved if the alternative belonged in another package (l

Re: Bug#481689: should default to gksudo if root doesn't have a password

2008-05-17 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 17 mai 2008 à 18:26 -0400, Avery Fay a écrit : > Package: gksu > Version: 2.0.0-5 > Severity: important > > The latest snapshots of the debian installer allow root to have no > password (pure sudo system). Since gksu seems to default to su behavior > instead of sudo behavior, this brea

Bug#460228: tasksel: please remove hplip from the desktop task

2008-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
On ven, 2008-01-11 at 11:59 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > Er, hplip is *primarily* useful on desktops. The printers that benefit most > from this daemon are the multifunction ones; wandering between your print > server and your desktop to scan documents doesn't sound like a very good > workflow t

Bug#460228: tasksel: please remove hplip from the desktop task

2008-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 11 janvier 2008 à 15:13 +0100, Per Olofsson a écrit : > Is this something that has changed recently? I have used hplip on my desktop > in > the past, and it has included I/O daemons and a toolbox program which has made > it possible to turn on the printer automatically, check ink level

Bug#460228: tasksel: please remove hplip from the desktop task

2008-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: tasksel Version: 2.70 Severity: wishlist The hplip package, while being very useful in some situations, and especially on a print server, doesn’t have its place on a desktop machine. The driver part (hpijs) is useful for the desktop, but hpijs is about administrating a remote printer, so

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2008-01-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
So, what is the current situation of this bug? Are you willing me to improve the patch? If so, in what ways should it be improved? Cheers, -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `-

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2007-11-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 15:58 +0100, Miro Dietiker a écrit : > I followed this discussion and finally thought about what are we using > tmpfiles for... > I see some typical applications where huge tmp comes into place: > Say i'm processing huge amount of data (but i'm not using a > d

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2007-11-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 14:44 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > D-I does allow setting up a system without swap and I have seen installation > reports where users actually did that. There's nothing we can do against users shooting themselves in the foot. > Of course, in most cases that will >

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2007-11-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 12:52 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > I wonder whether this shouldn't include a check for minimal available RAM > size. > > Is tmpfs still a good idea for systems with little RAM? > I'm thinking NSLU, m68k, older 486/Pentiums, etc. I think so. The reason is that on such

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2007-11-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, Le samedi 10 novembre 2007 à 06:13 +, Christian Perrier a écrit : > So, actually, I don't think there would be any strong opposition of > the remaining D-I team members for such change...as long as someone > takes the task of working on it (without breaking D-I, you would have > guessed).

Bug#245465: tmpfs for /tmp

2007-11-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, do you intend to change this for lenny? The change is absolutely trivial, and has very positive side effects, like the guarantee of a usable system even if all filesystems are full. Given the current memory requirements of debian-installer, I don't think there is a target system for which it

Bug#421323: Where to assign bugs for incorrect GNOME menu entries ?

2007-05-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 14:34 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > You don't have to modify menu entries; gksu can be made to behave like > > gksudo by setting the /apps/gksu/sudo-modo GConf key. > > We're also supposed to be able to do it

Bug#421323: Where to assign bugs for incorrect GNOME menu entries ?

2007-05-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 14:30 +0200, Christian Perrier a écrit : > Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tuesday 01 May 2007 08:56, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Hmmm, I fail to understand why this bug is reassigned to user-setup. > > > > IIRC this issue has been reported before and we've

Re: Bug#419595: libpango1.0-udeb: undesirable new dependencies

2007-04-20 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 20 avril 2007 à 12:40 +0700, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan a écrit : > > If it is necessary to have it, we can split the thai module in a > > separate udeb to avoid the dependency inflation. Otherwise, we can > > simply remove it from the udeb. > > IMO, this issue is not so critical, as lo

Re: Bug#419595: libpango1.0-udeb: undesirable new dependencies

2007-04-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 16 avril 2007 à 21:31 +0200, Frans Pop a écrit : > Package: libpango1.0-udeb > Version: 1.16.2-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: d-i > > I just noticed that the libpango udeb has gotten two new dependencies on > libraries so far not used in the installer: libdatrie0 and libthai0. > > Is the

Re: D-I RC2 - Revisited

2007-02-23 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 23 février 2007 à 00:42 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > It also means that this is the last chance to make any (important) changes > before RC2. If there is anyting that still needs to be done before RC2 > (either general or architecture specific), please met me know by replying > to th

Bug#410782: tasksel: grdesktop is deprecated, please use tsclient instead

2007-02-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
e and maintained by the GNOME team. Please include tsclient instead in the default installation. Cheers, -- Josselin Mouette -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#370098: tasksel: Desktop Environment installs both firefox and galeon

2007-01-28 Thread Josselin Mouette
retitle 370098 epiphany isn't installed by the default installation severity 370098 important thanks Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 23:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le dimanche 04 juin 2006 à 16:01 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > No. Both epi

Bug#407138: autodetection leads to vesa used instead of nv

2007-01-19 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 18 janvier 2007 à 22:40 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > [Josselin Mouette] > > lspci -n output: > > > > 00:07.0 0604: 8086:25e7 (rev 12) > > This is the wrong device. It is a bridge. Please send info on PCI > device 07:00.0. I suspect it is PCI

Bug#370098: tasksel: Desktop Environment installs both firefox and galeon

2007-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 10:16 -0500, Joey Hess a écrit : > Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Apparently, the situation has gotten worse: with the latest daily build > > (which, I have to say, kicks ass for all other things that matter - full > > install in 12 minutes), only fire

Bug#407138: autodetection leads to vesa used instead of nv

2007-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Package: discover1-data Version: 2.2006.12.28 I've just installed etch on a brand new Xeon system with a nVidia Quadro FX 3500 graphics card, and the X server configured itself to use the "vesa" driver, while this card is perfectly supported by the "nv" driver. Here is the lspci output for this d

Re: Bugs in default GNOME etch?

2007-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 11:22 +0200, Eddy Petrișor a écrit : > > Epiphany is not installed by default? If this is the case, I consider it > > a very important bug in debian-installer. > > Hmm, AFAIR, it wasn't two weeks ago, and I thought *this* was intentional and > was happy about it. On ou

Re: Bugs in default GNOME etch?

2007-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 02:46 +0100, Luca Capello a écrit : >Is there a practical reason for requesting xpm icons? No need to >explain if an answer already exists, but I cannot find it. This is because some menu systems don't understand other formats. > 4) evince doesn't appear by def

Re: Bug#403639: Fix committed in svn repo

2007-01-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le jeudi 11 janvier 2007 à 18:30 +0100, Frans Pop a écrit : > On Thursday 11 January 2007 18:21, Loïc Minier wrote: > > I've uploaded these debs to unstable. > > OK, thanks. That means that we can get some more testing in before > requesting migration. > > Let's hope that with Lenny we can swit

  1   2   >