out that it was almost
immeasurably fast on a tmpfs. =)
While it's generally true that it's important not to optimise without
test data to measure against, many of the things that I expected to take
alot of time just don't because everything is already in memory.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
oth the beta4 branch and the trunk. I use
anonymous to connect. How do I get its permissions fixed?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
What do they mean when they say "pirate"? They're saying that helping
your neighbor is the moral equivalent of attacking a ship.
- Richard M. Stallman
signatur
esult in that anyway.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-03-22 at 04:44, Safir Secerovic Linux Zagor wrote:
> I believe this is not a bug, this occured at my sun ultra1 also, but it
> is due to a CD-ROM drive on your ultra not READING A REWRITABLE CD
> PROPERLY, TRY BURNING YOUR ISO IMAGE ON A PLAIN CD-R disc.
That's an interesting theory
i sets up for serial-only
machines. I doubt this is sparc-specific, though. I'll probably hit
this one when I start porting to Arm next week.
Thank-you so much!
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ing those.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joey,
Can you please update the sparc section of:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ports-status
To reflect that netboot is different for sparc32 and sparc64? All the
CDs are unified, however.
I don't remember hearing a success report for sparc32.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Igno
at it's uncontested that discover is
the best choice for 2.4, and that we're only talking about 2.6 kernels?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ested because if we need hotplug anyway for pc-card stuff and
possibly for correct udev support, it might make sense to not bother
with discover2 at all, and just use discover1 for 2.4, and hotplug for
2.6.
(I don't know what the 2.2 folks need)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 03:37:50PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jeff Bailey]
> > I'm curious, though. The new hotplug seems to have the goal of
> > replacing discover. It may make sense to use that instead of
> > discover2 on 2.6 based systems (since it&#
an find my latest packages on
> http://pkg-discover.alioth.debian.org/. They are even apt-getable :-)
> Also Jeff Bailey once said in private mail, that he will probably work on
> discover and check if all patches are merged. He is working on 2.6 supp
I'm just finishing a trial run, but it looks like ia64 nightlies will be
generated again starting tonight.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of all that
for me, so I was able to ignore it.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Ignorance was bliss.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
achine that generates the nightly snapshots needs to be reinstalled,
and I'm getting hit on this bug myself. =)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 08:03, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> Ok, I found why. In initrd, /dev is not populated, and so there is no
> /dev/console when initrd is mounted. I don't know why, maybe it's
> related to devfs.
>
> Anyone has a idea ?
>
> PS : i did a mknod console c 5 1 in the initrd image
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:37:27AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > partconf no longer offers ext2 as a choice, so this bug is resolved.
>
> Yoiks, what about people who want ext2?
Erm. Yeah. Please keep. hurd-i386 only has ext2 and ufs as reasonable
choices right now.
--
Don't worry. You're ju
s should be in the category "things anyone who cares about
Sparc" can do, as opposed to the "benc and davem are the only ones with
a clue how to fix this" category... =) Your call, though.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
i
27;t we just use parted for now, until a better solution
comes around? It's in the archive, and AFAICT supports Sparc. (ia64
uses it right now, too)
> we also need a silo-installer
Right. Any takers? =)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e partman thing will make this silently go away before we get there.
Other TODOs:
- Once we have CD Booting working, start producing snapshots for Manty
to builds CDs from.
- Switch from piggyback to tilo. tilo currently doesn't like our
kernels, though. (This isn't necessary, just a nice
supported, or did they fit somehow boot off of those other images?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ppen first or around the same time.
(Not critical, though, since discover1 generally works for most 2.6
cases)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ate
> to mess with separate package lists.)
Let's work together on this - I've been thinking about it alot, and
haven't come up with a solution that meets all the needs. =(
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nts about it, I'll probably apply my
config. I don't have the skills to fix tilo, and we can always switch
to it later.
> Once these bugs are resolved, and fdisk-udeb, new kbd-chooser and
> partionner are added to the archive, we will have a good d-i for sparc !
Have you tested wi
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 02:33, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> This patch would introduce /usr/bin/tr in discover-modprobe .
> Is that a problem?
This might cause a problem on systems that have /usr on a separate
filesystem.
Can you use "sed -e 's/-/_/g'" ? It's in /bin
Tks
nt to play along, my nightly snapshot for Sparc will
include this patch.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:01:15PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
> Hi,
>
> about the problem with the "bus error", I think it's coming from the
> file unifont.bgf
> it'
modules
anyway?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
7;s about
> the line in config/i386/cdrom.cfg :
> EXTRALIBS = /lib/libnss_dns* /lib/libresolv*
I've been meaning to take a look at that, since libc-udeb should have
those files in it anyway.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
body applied the two last patchs ?
One of them was already done. Please don't keep overloading a single
bug with multiple patches. Some of them are likely to get lost.
I think I've got all of them in CVS now.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
wait to see what BenC's comments on this are. I'm cc:'ing
#231484, where I filed a tentative patch to tilo.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e be reasonably combined. Having separate
directories, plus ranges within them. It would mean that we could keep
decent historical information (like debian-cd still has potato and other
things) without having to worry about cruft building up in the current
sandbox.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNS
issue.
I just had to poke around and insmod all the right pieces in the right
order and it went. Consider using 'modprobe' instead, which often takes
care of that for you.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are mer
ughts?
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
at the
autobuilder sits in/
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
I never know what to expect when you respond to my postings. No insult
intended, you are merely a surprise :)
- Carlos O'Donnell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 18:13, Blars Blarson wrote:
> The first six bugs in the list below are the ones I am talking about.
> All have patches in the BTS and have been sitting unfixed for a couple
> of weeks. Unless someone convinces me otherwise, I'll upgrade them to
> grave in two days.
This doe
rouble figuring out exactly how to get them to
> boot...
Luvly! The linux-kernel-di stuff is almost done - I have to test thm's
build patch to get the kernels named right. I've updated the image
directories this afternoon for the new udebs.
Hopefully there'll be Sparc images
who dual boot between the two.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.
I haven't attempted to install them (I'm not well setup for netboot
here), so I can't say whether they should be "Building" or "Working"
(anyone have a sec to try it?)
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:23, David Nusinow wrote:
> And for discover1, there is a patch that apparently works to allow
> discover1 to work with 2.6.
I've been using the "modprobe -n" solution proposed in #223682 for a
couple weeks now and it's been working well.
Tks
parc is multiarch. I'm working with BenC to get the
Sparc kernels done such that they include the System.map for us. Then
we need to point depmod to the right System.map for each architecture.
(Recall that sun4u needs 64 bit kernels and sun4m cannot have them).
See bug 227644 - I'm hoping t
er building d-i I got a cdrom-image.img and a cdrom-initrd.gz
You shouldn't need to do this - Sparc is generally expected to be in 32
bit mode when you're compiling. Other packages in Debian don't do
anything to check for this.
I generally do a "sparc32 /bin/bash" do ma
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 01:38:26PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Discussing with Jeff Bailey on IRC today indicates that a solution is
> forthcoming on this bug: he estimates that in a week, there will be new
> glibc packages in the archive that don't depend on the upstream kernel
or bug against.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
Are you going to stay vegeterian?
Are you going to start eating human flesh?
(from http://www.moshez.org/vegeterian.html)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 175353 mklibs,libstc++5-pic
thanks
This bug does not apply to libc6 - our _pic.map files are
arch-dependant.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:33:20AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 175353 mkli
43 matches
Mail list logo
