Quoting myself:
> Some work remains to be done:
> - make the statistics framework functional
> (http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/l10n-stats)
Done.
> - make the translators notification system functional
To be done.
> - document changes
To be done.
> - debug everything that's been broken
Noth
A build of the Debian Installer Manual was triggered by an update to SVN.
There were no errors during the build process.
The new version of the manual has been uploaded successfully.
A log of the build is available at:
- http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/logs/en.log
===
It is possible to use R
reassign 464023 installation-reports
thanks
> Symptom
> I insert Debian(Lenny) CD 1 in CD-ROM Power on
> ... Installing the base system
> Set up users and passwords
> Configure the package managerScan another CD or DVD?
> No <-- this
> Use a network mirror
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 464023 installation-reports
Bug#464023: Debian(Lenny) installer stuck.
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports,apt-setup' to
`installation-reports'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> The stuff i'd like to upload consists in the web frontend itself, which
> i plan to add to cdebconf/src/modules/frontends/web, and some cgi files
> which could be added for now to cdebconf/test/web and later moved to a
> dedicate udeb.
> Can i
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Grant Grundler wrote:
> > Grant, do you happen to know a similar trick to detect 64-bit support
> > even when the installer is running with a 32-bit kernel?
>
> Hrm...yes. I explain the "trick" and also some caveats on why I would
> rather leave this user selectable.
OK
Hi,
I've put an armel/versatile netboot build at:
http://people.debian.org/~rmh/d-i/versatile/netboot/
Just in case someone finds it useful.
Notes:
- Linux modules won't load, but all the stuff needed for a basic (ext3)
install on qemu is built-in.
- Installing unstable works; ins
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
>
> So for the time being, its looks far better to put the work into
> something that provides users with a superior user experience; for
> instance, superior by choice (like what the plugin finder improvement
> would do); grow the us
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does not
> > support booting from LVM.
>
> It does, starting with GRUB 2. I need to test this setup with D-I, when
> I get a minute..
I'm aware of that, but that's not really relev
> --- packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (revision 51583)
> +++ packages/rootskel/debian/changelog (working copy)
[...]
> + [ Joey Hess ]
> + * Modify init to support userdevfs again.
Care to elaborate on this and explain why this is needed?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
Mirroring lenny right now so I don't have to modify the mirror
configs. I'll see how that goes.
After an install I have to apt-get update before packages are
authenticated. Tar file in the following paste is before the apt-get
update, 'ls -l' is after. notice that the Release.gpg moves from
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:47:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> > > Comments/Problems:
> > > Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> > > Why not grub?
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> I've attached an updated patch. Thanks for the comments.
Thanks for the update, but I'm afraid I have one more.
Please define variables used inside functions with 'local', especially when
defining variables with common names like "type".
Partm
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 06:18:26PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> > Comments/Problems:
> > Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> > Why not grub?
>
> Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does
On Friday 22 February 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Apt-setup can install a key for a localn mirror using "d-i
> apt-setup/localn/key" but only downloads the key and installs it with
> apt-key in /target. On first boot of the machines, this mirror is
> still considered unauthenticated as apt wan
On Friday 22 February 2008, Igor Morgado wrote:
> Comments/Problems:
> Lilo failed to install (reported that) but it was sucessufuly installed.
> Why not grub?
Because you did not create a separate /boot partition and grub does not
support booting from LVM.
> There is nothing in /var/log/debian
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:11:51PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> I saw that Otavio committed the multipath udeb. The indentation in various
> scripts is a complete mess.
The indentation used spaces instead of tabs in several spaces, I cleaned
that up.
> Also, it looks like the finish-install script s
Hi Frans
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:53:52PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> > attached is an updated patch against current partman-base. I attach an
> > updated version for review since it contains a template which might be
> > interesting for translato
Hi Tiago,
On Saturday 23 February 2008, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> I guess it might be something wrong with the creation of dm device. Here
> is the syslog lines which shows when the problem starts:
I have tried to reproduce the failure, but cannot. I have only tried LVM on
RAID0 though and i
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:17:42PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> > On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
> > > total have enough market pow
Op 26-02-2008 om 17:48 schreef Eddy Petri??or:
> On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
> > total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
> > difference yet. We are getting closer to that
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > >
> > > The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
> > > users won't rea
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
> > total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
> > difference yet. We are gettin
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> attached is an updated patch for multipath detection in hw-detect. The
> patch hasn't changed it's just rediffed against current SVN.
This line is way to cryptic to my taste:
[ -n "$(/sbin/multipath -l)" && $? ] && return 0 || return 1
C
This patch enables armel/versatile in the build dir.
Note that bumping KERNELVERSION is also required to make it work (which I
didn't include in my patch to avoid being disruptive).
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> attached is an updated patch against current partman-base. I attach an
> updated version for review since it contains a template which might be
> interesting for translators
There are two (minor) issues in:
+ if [ "$type" != multipath ] -a
I saw that Otavio committed the multipath udeb. The indentation in various
scripts is a complete mess.
Also, it looks like the finish-install script should be a base-installer
script (and should include what's in the finish.d script) as that would
remove the need to run update-initramfs again.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> >
> > The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
> > users won't really notice what they are running and might perceive
> > debian in general
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Guido Günther wrote:
> Template: disk-detect/multipath/enable
> Type: boolean
> Default: false
> Description: for internal use; can be preseeded
> Check for the presence of multipathed devices?
There is really no need to review templates that are only used internally
On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
> total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
> difference yet. We are getting closer to that point, but that doesn't
> mean that its wise to start
Hi,
Otavio asked me to put this template snippet out for review. It's been
added to svn recently when we added multipath support to disk-detect:
Template: disk-detect/multipath/enable
Type: boolean
Default: false
Description: for internal use; can be preseeded
Check for the presence of multipathe
Hi,
attached is an updated patch against current partman-base. I attach an
updated version for review since it contains a template which might be
interesting for translators
Template: partman/text/multipath
Type: text
_Description: Multipath %s (WWID %s)
Template: partman/text/multipath_partition
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
>
> The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
> users won't really notice what they are running and might perceive
> debian in general as "being-broken" if they visit a site that has
> not-support flash conte
On Tuesday 26 February 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any comments on this one? If nobody objects, I'd like to check it in.
> But I want to be careful not to disrupt the release process for beta1 ...
Please wait until at least either Martin or Joey comment. They are the most
active "porters" for
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:13PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >
> > > Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
> > > good
> > > state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by tha
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:00:33PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> For the moment I'd prefer to keep it for some time in testing and see how it
> works for everyone before adding it to the desktop task, even though it works
> quite well now for me and for other people I've asked to try it, it needs
--- Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >
> > > Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in
> a
> > > good
> > > state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
> > > tim
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> package archdetect disk-detect ethdetect hw-detect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hw-detect archdetect ethdetect disk-detect
> tags 440439 + pending
Bug#440439: add multipath suppor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> package archdetect disk-detect ethdetect hw-detect
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: hw-detect archdetect ethdetect disk-detect
> tags 440439 + pending
Bug#440439: add multipath suppor
Any comments on this one? If nobody objects, I'd like to check it in. But
I want to be careful not to disrupt the release process for beta1 ...
This change implies that linux-kernel-di-armel-2.6 will only be buildable on
sid untill 2.6.24 migrates; I assume that's not a problem?
On Mon, Feb 2
Hi,
attached is an updated patch for multipath detection in hw-detect. The
patch hasn't changed it's just rediffed against current SVN.
Cheers,
-- Guido
>From 96b6e14bf63d4df4ec62d8838ecbdbf2c30a17ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:23:38
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.8
Severity: minor
I think this package is missing a Recommends on gpgv (and possibly
others; debian-archive-keyring?).
Or at least a Suggests. But I'd suggest to recommend (instead of recommending
to suggest, heh).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/s
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:06:34PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> >This is no excuse for not contemplating stability, but in my experience
> >with
> >first-time users, they get the worst impression from youtube not working
> >(and
> >the response from the browser being utterly confusing) than with
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:29:26AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
>
> Note that usually people think of gnash in terms of the „flash plugin
> for firefox”, and since the gnash package doesn't actually offer that
> functionality, in tasksel we should talk about "mozilla-plugin-gnash" or
> "konquero
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> > Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
> > good
> > state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
> > time?
>
> I think it is stable enough to be included in Lenny, but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 467324 -1
Bug#467324: include gnash in desktop?
Bug 467324 cloned as bug 467564.
> reassign -1 gnash
Bug#467564: include gnash in desktop?
Bug reassigned from package `tasksel' to `gnash'.
> retitile -1 gnash: debris from older versions make cur
clone 467324 -1
reassign -1 gnash
retitile -1 gnash: debris from older versions make current ones break
# don't know if this should be serious, but since gnash was never part
# of a release, I guess important is ok
severity -1 important
thanks
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:40:0
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
I have removed everything under ~/.local/share/gnash, and now I started
looking for anything containing 'gnash' in .
The ARM images failed to build because the Netwinder image is too
large (by around 200 bytes!). While investigating what to do about
this, I noticed that the 2.6.24 kernel is about 80 KB larger than
2.6.22. So even if we fix this now for beta1, it will probably break
again for beta2. Therefore w
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:40:07AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
> >
> >Please can you be more specific?
> >
> > - versions you have tried
>
> All official versions (there has been a regression at some point, but
> unfortunately I can't say when it happened).
>
> I have tried the version from uns
50 matches
Mail list logo
