On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> > Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
> > good
> > state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
> > time?
>
> I think it is stable enough to be included in Lenny, but it is not perfect
> yet, as you might imagine :)
So do you think the stabilization process for lenny will efficiently hammer
out any outstanding regressions [1] ? Also, do you think the increased
visibility / exposition that my proposed change implies would help [2] on this?
(and if so, is this an appropiate time, or is it too early?).
[1] regressions relative to the flash-less setup we had in etch; i.e. browser
crashes/hangs or so. "foo.com not working" is not one of those IMO
[2] Can't speak for others, but I at least would love to see this happen, and
would gladly help by using Gnash on my daily browser usage, in order to
at least submit useful debug information if a bug is found.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
