--- Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >
> > > Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in
> a
> > > good
> > > state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
> > > time?
> >
> > I think it is stable enough to be included in Lenny, but it is not perfect
> > yet, as you might imagine :)
>
> So do you think the stabilization process for lenny will efficiently hammer
> out any outstanding regressions [1] ? Also, do you think the increased
> visibility / exposition that my proposed change implies would help [2] on
> this?
For the moment I'd prefer to keep it for some time in testing and see how it
works for everyone before adding it to the desktop task, even though it works
quite well now for me and for other people I've asked to try it, it needs more
beta-testing before adding it as default for desktop. Another point of concern
is that it is not really a lightweight plugin (not that the proprietary plugin
is either, anyway).
Miry
______________________________________________
¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas
http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
