Bug#247997: marked as done (Sparc Ultra5 installation report)

Your message dated Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:42:14 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Sparc Ultra 5 works now has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibi

Bug#261463: Missing drivers on powerpc 2.6 businesscard install

Package: installation-reports powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The powerpc 2.6 kernel version of the d-i is missing drivers (modules or built-

Re: Application Confirmation ID: 09046

Hello My name is Aisha Baldwin and I am a   mo rtgage broker that was assigned to your case. I just review your application and glad to inform you that we can approve you. Please click on http://www.ngcorp.info/";>this link and enter some more info so I cancomplete your application. We should be

Debian Installer final string freeze status

Final status of Debian Installer translation at the end of the string freeze 33 complete languages zh_TW, zh_CN, uk, tr, sv, sk, ru, ro, pt_BR, pt, pl, nn, nl, lt, ko, ja, it, id, hu, hr, he, fr, fi, eu, es, el, de, da, cy, cs, ca, bg, ar 03 nearly complete sq (99.65%), nb (97.79%), bs (95.73%)

Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller

reassign 261320 makedev retitle 261320 please add dac960 to default device list for alpha thanks On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:43:06AM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote: > Debian-installer-version: > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/20040724/sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso > uname -

Processed: Re: Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 261320 makedev Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `makedev'. > retitle 261320 please add dac960 to default device list for alpha Bug#261320: Kernel installation fail

Bug#261460: Non-DHCP network config step of d-i is broken

Package: installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724] OldWorld PowerMac INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The manual (non-dhcp) configuration option of the "config network" step is broken. Here is a blow-b

aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: aboot-installer_0.0.13.dsc to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.13.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.13.tar.gz to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.13.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.udeb to pool/main/a/aboot-installer/aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.udeb Announc

Processing of aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.changes

aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: aboot-installer_0.0.13.dsc aboot-installer_0.0.13.tar.gz aboot-installer_0.0.13_alpha.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

partman-newworld_8_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman-newworld_8.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_8.dsc partman-newworld_8.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_8.tar.gz partman-newworld_8_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-newworld/partman-newworld_8_powerpc.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PRO

Bug#261450: MSDOS tools on the powerpc install CD?

reassign 261450 debian-cd thanks On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 10:56:16PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote: > Package: installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724] (Please don't put extra junk in the Package: line; just "installation-reports" is fine. The extra junk causes the bug to have to be recategorized manua

Processing of partman-newworld_8_powerpc.changes

partman-newworld_8_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-newworld_8.dsc partman-newworld_8.tar.gz partman-newworld_8_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Processed: Re: Bug#261450: MSDOS tools on the powerpc install CD?

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 261450 debian-cd Bug#261450: MSDOS tools on the powerpc install CD? Warning: Unknown package 'powerpc' Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724]' to `debian-cd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Processed: reassign 261448 to installation-reports

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 261448 installation-reports Bug#261448: Is it really necesary for the partitioner to check the swap space? Warning: Unknown package 'powerpc' Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724]' to `installation-reports'. >

Bug#261450: MSDOS tools on the powerpc install CD?

Package: installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724] OldWorld PowerMac INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: Is it really necessary for the powerpc businesscard CD (and I assume the netinst CD as well) to carr

Bug#261448: Is it really necesary for the partitioner to check the swap space?

Package: installation-reports:[powerpc][20040724] OldWorld PowerMac INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: What does the partitioner do in it's "check the swap space" phase? If it's just doing a media check

Bug#261451: S/390 Installation Report

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Built from svn 25 July 2004 1900:00 (or so) -0500 uname -a: Linux di 2.4.26-1-s390 #1 SMP Sun Apr 25 16:48:39 CEST 2004 s390 GNU/Linux Date: 25 July 2004 21:15 -0500 Method: IPL from virtual reader. Installed "unstable" from

Bug#261235: marked as done (discover1-data: fix Apple ohci1394 ids)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:17:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261235: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#259525: marked as done (use ati instead of readeon for XFree86)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:17:05 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259525: fixed in discover1-data 1.2004.07.25 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

discover1-data_1.2004.07.25_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.25_all.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.25_all.udeb discover1-data_1.2004.07.25.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.07.25.dsc discover1-data_1.2004.07.25.tar.gz to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1

Processing of discover1-data_1.2004.07.25_i386.changes

discover1-data_1.2004.07.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1-data_1.2004.07.25.dsc discover1-data_1.2004.07.25.tar.gz discover1-data_1.2004.07.25_all.deb discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.07.25_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon

(d)DT(p)-config?

I think it's very important now. (like choose-mirror) Can base-config or d-i get this crucial chooser(/configurator/module) ? THX, sas (from Hungary) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#257988: Install report: PowerMac G4 Cube

I also did this same install with the same hardware and a current (2000724) net-install iso image. Everything went smoothly except for two areas: 1) Just like your install, the auto net config did not work. I too made due with a manual static config. However, unlike you I was able to write a /etc/

Bug#259664: marked as done (tasksel: please add a --descr-task commandline option)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259664: fixed in tasksel 2.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#54233: marked as done (tasksel: tasksel doesnt show already installed taskpackages)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#54233: fixed in tasksel 2.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your r

Bug#260233: marked as done (tasksel: incorrect description of th japanese-desktop task)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260233: fixed in tasksel 2.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#259832: marked as done (Update for swedish-desktop)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 20:17:08 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#259832: fixed in tasksel 2.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

tasksel_2.07_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: tasksel_2.07.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.07.dsc tasksel_2.07.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.07.tar.gz tasksel_2.07_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.07_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 259664 259832 260233 54233 Thank you for your

Processing of tasksel_2.07_i386.changes

tasksel_2.07_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.07.dsc tasksel_2.07.tar.gz tasksel_2.07_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

ntoihng you cant do!

=_NextPart_000_%RND_NUM_j.7 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The b=E8st onl=ECne ph=E0rm=E3cy is just =F5ne cl=ECck away At Pharm=F5ze , we bring you the same dr=F9gs, the gen=E8ric version - the same qual=ECty, the same f=F5rmulae-at a very reasonabl

Bug#261430: installing report

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: beta4 uname -a: Linux Helmi 2.4.25-1-386 #2 Wed Apr 14 19:38:08 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 24.7.2004 Method: How did you install? I used net install (and aptitude). http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386

Bug#260093: debian-installer installation-report AlphaStation 500/333 - aboot partition problems

reassign 260093 aboot-installer severity 260093 important thanks On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 07:43:33AM +0200, Ferdinand O. Tempel wrote: > > This bug in the partitioner should be addressed as of the 20040720 daily > > (sid_d-i) CD images. If you can, I would appreciate it if you would > > re-test th

Processed: Re: Bug#260093: debian-installer installation-report AlphaStation 500/333 - aboot partition problems

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 260093 aboot-installer Bug#260093: debian-installer installation-report AlphaStation 500/333 Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `aboot-installer'. > severity 260093 important Bug#260093: debian-installer installation-report

Re: Installing Sarge on Alpha

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:57:46PM +0900, Horms wrote: > There is a new kernel-source-2.4.26 package, 2.4.26-4 > and a new kernel-image-2.4.26-i386 package, also 2.4.26-4. > There are no changes to the kernel-image package, > other than building it against the new kernel-source. > The change log

You'll need your tracking # Q6 566221

Hello, Did you recieve my email from last week? I'm happy to tell you that you are approved for a home loan with a 5.49% rate. Your tracking number is # D8 569 231 You must visit the link below in 24 hrs to confirm your details. http://loanslink.net/?partid=moffob Best Regards, Rex York Gener

Re: Root-on-raid install ?

On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 22:59, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > The debian installer, however, doesn't know how to install with root & > boot on anything but a 'plain' partition. There are several ways around > this (search the archives for a message from me describing how to > install to root-on-LV

Debian Installer string freeze status 07/25 21:30

Status as of 07/24 21:30UTC, 2:30 hours left 33 complete languages zh_TW, zh_CN, uk, tr, sv, sk, ru, ro, pt_BR, pt, pl, nn, nl, lt, ko, ja, it, id, hu, hr, he, fr, fi, eu, es, el, de, da, cy, cs, ca, bg, ar 03 nearly complete sq (99.65%), nb (97.79%), bs (95.73%) 03 partial sl (84.54%), gl (80

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 239795 -1 Bug#239795: [i386] [beta3] [netboot] failed base-install, other minor issues Bug 239795 cloned as bug 261415. > reassign -1 netcfg Bug#261415: [i386] [beta3] [netboot] failed base-install, other minor issues Bug reassigned from package

RE: my first impressions of your installer

> -Original Message- > From: Christian Perrier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 25 July 2004 22:31 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: my first impressions of your installer > > > Quoting peter green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > im in england i selected english > > the language selectio

Bug#261283: marked as done (install report)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:22:22 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Bug#261283: install report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Re: my first impressions of your installer

Quoting peter green ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > im in england i selected english > the language selection list makes no mention of American English or british > english it just says english But the second screen prompted you for a country unless you used an old version of the installer. If you choose

Bug#240372: marked as done ([sparc] [20040326] [businesscard] boot problem, then broken fstab)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 23:14:25 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Bug#240372: boot problem, then broken fstab has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:56:22PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > It seems to be happening an awful lot - I'd suggest including some kind > > of automated reinstall of all the packages in the testing of the > > installer (next time I do an install I'll probably give this a whirl).

Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cannot_install_any_debian_-_no_kernels_support_USB_net_cards??=

Joey Hess wrote: > Do usb nics really show up as pci devices? No. > We may just lack any way to detect them at all, short of hotplug > events. discover at least claims to support USB, and it contains an usb.lst. It doesn't look like hw-detect tells discover to enable it though. -- Pelle --

Processed: tags

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 260787 console-data Bug#260787: Please include Norwegian++ keymap for Sparc installs Bug reassigned from package `kbd-chooser' to `console-data'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trackin

RE: my first impressions of your installer

> > 5: there was no mention of secuirty updates (is this because > the secuirty > > updated for sarge aren't aranged yet?) > > This is also by design, and is because security updates are used by > default. well it didn't put any security updates line in my sources.list > > > 6: the timezone selec

Bug#240367: various problems

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would v

Re: my first impressions of your installer

Hi Peter, On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 04:49:14PM +0100, peter green wrote: > 2: there was no mention of contrib or non-free. This is by design. The sarge installer defaults to not including contrib or non-free in your sources, unless you run the installer at a higher verbosity. > 5: there was no me

Bug#239821: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [CD] (unspecified) problems during base-config)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:10:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Processed: Bug#239821: problems during base-config has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#239795: failed base-install, other minor issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems with the debian installer back in March, I would v

Re: FireWire module issues on powerpc, worked around

Colin Watson wrote: > > On i386, nic-modules does appear on images without of > > firewire-core-modules, and some of these are very tight on space (like > > the root floppy), but none of those really need firewire ethernet since > > it's only used with 2.6. > > I'd expect nic-extra-modules to be a

ddetect override disparity

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): hw-detect-full_0.110_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and t

ddetect_0.110_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: archdetect_0.110_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.110_i386.udeb ddetect_0.110.dsc to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.110.dsc ddetect_0.110.tar.gz to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.110.tar.gz ethdetect_0.110_all.udeb to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.110_all.udeb hw-det

Processing of ddetect_0.110_i386.changes

ddetect_0.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: ddetect_0.110.dsc ddetect_0.110.tar.gz hw-detect_0.110_all.udeb ethdetect_0.110_all.udeb hw-detect-full_0.110_all.udeb archdetect_0.110_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UN

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.62_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb cdrom-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb ext3-modules-2.6.

Re: FireWire module issues on powerpc, worked around

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 01:57:57PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Colin Watson wrote: > > To cope with this, I've moved eth1394 from firewire-core-modules to > > nic-modules in linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6, so that it isn't available > > until ethdetect runs. This is fairly simple for powerpc 2.6, as it

Processing of linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.62_i386.changes

linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.62_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.62.dsc linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_0.62.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb nic-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_0.62_i386.udeb nic-extra-modules-2.6.7-1-386-di_

arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: arcboot-installer_0.011.dsc to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.011.dsc arcboot-installer_0.011.tar.gz to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.011.tar.gz arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.udeb to pool/main/a/arcboot-installer/arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.ud

partman_46_multi.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: partman_46.dsc to pool/main/p/partman/partman_46.dsc partman_46.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman/partman_46.tar.gz partman_46_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_46_i386.udeb partman_46_mips.udeb to pool/main/p/partman/partman_46_mips.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Than

Bug#260658: marked as done (Installation report (amd64))

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:32:02 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260658: fixed in ddetect 0.110 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processing of arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.changes

arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: arcboot-installer_0.011.dsc arcboot-installer_0.011.tar.gz arcboot-installer_0.011_mips.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Processing of partman_46_multi.changes

partman_46_multi.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman_46_mips.udeb partman_46.tar.gz partman_46_i386.udeb partman_46.dsc Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl

Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cannot_install_any_debian_-_no_kernels_support_USB_net_cards??=

Colin Watson wrote: > Strange; nic-usb-modules in the new debian-installer has pegasus.o, and > it's priority standard so it really should be pulled in by the "Load > installer components from CD" step. I've checked, and that package is on > our current CD images. > > Can I just check that one of

Bug#260600: marked as done (i386 Installation: network config problem)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:02:03 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#260600: fixed in linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6 0.62 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Re: FireWire module issues on powerpc, worked around

Colin Watson wrote: > I've been trying to get the list of network interfaces before and after > the first reboot in sync on my PowerBook, so that I stop having to hack > /etc/network/interfaces around while base-config is running to cope with > the fact that discover detects eth1394 after the reboo

Re: discover2: new bus "sata"?

Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, Wouldn't it be reasonable to introduce a new bus 'sata' to discover? IMO no. What should it be good for? I don't know of any device hanging on an SATA bus needing some special kernel module. Kernel modu

Bug#261073: on serial console installs, file descriptor error

* Recai Oktas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-24 06:01]: > Attached is my proposal. It also includes the proper handling of > unicode mode. This works, at least for me. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?

Re: New d-i devcamp?

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 07:15:37PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > Last years d-i devcamp was a great success. The co-location with the > "non-intel linux gathering" in Oldenburg proved to move the d-i > porting a long step forward, and the grouping of d-i people managed to > improve d-i a

hard

xcjmlcpqgrukumvinhbcghvkwwsaratogaekdjfhbwptersthttovvudjlanheuser Need a little spice in your life? having problems with your male parts? Wana go for days? Keep the wife at home happy. Be happy. I keep it hard here http://icy-pr.info/sv/index.php?pid=eph8916 grisfxzhvwhtjdcymaoaltyufdbbwdl

Re: discover2: new bus "sata"?

On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 04:08:01PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > Wouldn't it be reasonable to introduce a new bus 'sata' > to discover? IMO no. What should it be good for? I don't know of any device hanging on an SATA bus needing some special kernel module. Kernel modules are needed

Re: Processed: cloning 260658, retitle -1 to pci ids for sata_sil, reassign -1 to discover1-data

Harald Dunkel wrote: I would suggest this patch: --- hw-detect~ 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100 +++ hw-detect 2004-07-23 20:46:40.657067301 +0200 @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ sparc/*) sbus=",sbus" ;; esac discover --format="%m:%V %M\n" --disable-all \

RE: RE: Cannot install any debian - no kernels support USB net cards?

1. the module wasn't compiled into the default installed kernel 2. when I tried to add it - either as module or compiled in - the option was simply absent from the kernel config. what kernel source were you buiding from? i suggest you use the 2.4.26 source direct from kernel.org to build yoursel

Bug#261374: discover1: [INTL:eu] Basque program translation update

tags 261374 pending thanks Quoting Piarres Beobide Egaña ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Package: discover1 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: l10n, d-i, patch > > > > Hello > > > Here atached the program absque translation update. Commixted..:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a su

Bug#261371: install report: amd64 works ok

clone 261371 -1 -2 reassign -1 os-prober retitle -1 os-prober: add amd64 tests (reuse i386's?) reassign -2 base-installer retitle -2 base-installer: add kernel guesswork for amd64 thanks On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 06:04:45PM +0200, Thomas J. Zeeman wrote: > First, the windows partition wasn't detecte

Processed: Re: Bug#261374: discover1: [INTL:eu] Basque program translation update

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 261374 pending Bug#261374: discover1: [INTL:eu] Basque program translation update Tags were: d-i l10n patch Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Processed: Re: Bug#261371: install report: amd64 works ok

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > clone 261371 -1 -2 Bug#261371: install report: amd64 works ok Bug 261371 cloned as bugs 261378-261379. > reassign -1 os-prober Bug#261378: install report: amd64 works ok Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `os-prober'. > retitle -1 o

Bug#261376: hppa testing (sarge) very slow installer

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-25 i get the boot.img from http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/ uname -a: Date: 2004-07-25 Method: i boot from lan with the bootpd running on another local machine directly connected Machine: HP 9000 Model 712/60 Proces

Bug#261374: discover1: [INTL:eu] Basque program translation update

Package: discover1 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n, d-i, patch Hello Here atached the program absque translation update. Please commit when you can thx -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Ker

Bug#261371: install report: amd64 works ok

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20040724 daily build from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images uname -a: Linux carrington 2.6.7-5-amd64-xeon #1 SMP Thu Jul 15 00:27:37 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux Date: 20040725 Method: A netboot install from

Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 07:00:20AM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote: > Thus spake Horms: > > I believe that the problem lies in grub's detection of devices. > > I am working on a patch to make this work correctly on cciss > > (which appears to be completely unsported at the moment). > > > > If I send y

Debian Installer string freeze status 07/25 15:00

Status as of 07/24 15:00UTC, 9 hours left 29 complete languages zh_CN, uk, tr, sk, ru, ro, pt_BR, pt, pl, nn, nl, lt, ko, ja, id hu, hr, he, fr, fi, eu, es, el, da, cy, cs, ca, bg, ar 06 nearly complete zh_TW, sq, de, it, nb, bs 03 partial sv, sl, sv 01 very partial fa it should be 100% at n

hey how are you diong

ErX Elíxír is 5 times more potent than V,í.a,g.r,a! íncreased s.e.m.e.n and s.p.e.r.m production up to 600%! íncreased circulation and E.N,L.A,R.G,E your girth and size up to 3 inches or MORE! íncreased testosterone levels! Obtain GIANT rock-solid more powerful e,r.e,c.t,í.o,n.s

Bug#234804: marked as done ([i386] [20040103] [CD] generally success)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 16:31:32 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#234804: generally success has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#243193: installation report for G5

--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 11, 2004 at 10:47:41AM -0700, Brian wrote: > > The machine booted from CD and i saw the Yaboot prompt. I > > tried install-power4 and the kernel began to initialize. > It > > got through about 30 linux until this message: > > Serial driver

testing hppa installation failed

Hello, I try to install the testing release on a HP 9000 model 712/60. The installer was much slower than the one from woody. Then as i let the installer partition my hard disk it did not create a PALO bootable partition. Is it an error or could it works without such a partition ? Then it hang dur

Bug#256547: lowmem and swap/fdisk (20 MB system)

Hi, just my thoughts (I am trying to install to 486/DX2 50 MHz with 20 MB of memory and PCMCIA ISA NIC without CD-ROM.) Summary: With minor change and text based prompting, d-i memory requirement can be lowered to 8-16 MB instead of current 32 MB. Details: Currently, 32 MB or so of RAM is needed

Re: Re: Request Confirmation ID: 44825

Re: L o an   A p proval   Notification and Conditions Sun, 25 Jul 2004 08:54:57 -0500 Dear Applicant: My name is Claude and I am a   mo r tgage   b roker that was assigned to your case. I just review your application and glad to inform you that we can approve you. Please click on this link and en

Bug#257693: marked as done (netcfg: fails when multiple interfaces available and DEBCONF_PRIORITY=critical)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:45:07 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line netcfg: fails when multiple interfaces available and DEBCONF_PRIORITY=critical has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#239752: debian-installer: small typo in Norwegian translation

On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 06:23:36AM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Severity: minor > > I think the translation for "downloading components" early in > the install said "laster ned kompenter" or something like that. > I can't claim to be sure to know the nynorsk spelling, but

Processed: seems like more a kernel bug than a bug in the split-up udebs

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 259913 kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64 Bug#259913: sr_mod does not work with Ultra60 cdrom Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64-di' to `kernel-image-2.4.26-sparc64'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller

Thus spake Horms: > I believe that the problem lies in grub's detection of devices. > I am working on a patch to make this work correctly on cciss > (which appears to be completely unsported at the moment). > > If I send you a patch for grub / new grub package for woody, > will you be able to test

Bug#261347: makedev - only builds devices for one partition per dasd

Package: makedev Version: 2.3.1-70 Severity: important makedev only builds devices for one partition per dasd instead of the three available. This breaks installations which wants to use more than one partition. line 1422 | # Not yet implemented. (Feb. 8, 2001) | # for part in 1 2 3 | for part i

Bug#250789: Please fix this bug!

Recai Oktas написав: > * Denis Barbier [2004-07-24 22:51:00+0200] > [...] > >>If termwrap is needed outside of d-i, I suggest to have a minimal >>termwrap-di to deal with Asian locales, and nothing more. > > > Eugeniy has once said that only those languages without a declared > debian-installer

zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: zipl-installer_0.0.3.dsc to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.3.dsc zipl-installer_0.0.3.tar.gz to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.3.tar.gz zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.udeb to pool/main/z/zipl-installer/zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PRO

Processing of zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.changes

zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: zipl-installer_0.0.3.dsc zipl-installer_0.0.3.tar.gz zipl-installer_0.0.3_s390.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsu

Bug#261340: Installation Report

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040723 Date: 25/07/2004 11AM Method: netinst cd Machine: Sony Vaio PCG-K215B Processor: Intel Celeron 2.80 GHz Memory: 512 MB (256 MB x 2) DDR SDRAM (PC2100 - DDR266) Root Device: IDE Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:

Bug#261320: Kernel installation fails on DAC960 controller

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:43:06AM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote: > > Package: installation-reports > > Debian-installer-version: > http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/alpha/20040724/sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso > uname -a: Linux buddha 2.4.26-1-generic #2 Sat May 1 16:31:16 EST 20

Processed: 261279+pending

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 261279 + pending Bug#261279: discover1: [INTL:pt_BR] Please apply attached patch to update Brazilian Portuguese translation Tags were: l10n patch sid Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance

Bug#261306: Partitioning problem on alpha

On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:25:40AM -0500, Nathan Poznick wrote: > Thus spake Steve Langasek: > > Is there any chance you could get me the start and end sectors for the > > aboot partition, using fdisk? > Sure, here's what I have (after re-doing the last 3 partitions due to > the issue mentioned be

Bug#261325: marked as done (network-console-config: Calling base-config-network-console doesn't display the network config dialog)

Your message dated Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:06:09 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#261325: network-console-config: Calling base-config-network-console doesn't display the network config dialog has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you cl

  1   2   >